Kajulo Mkveila vs Republic (HC Criminal Appeal No. 50 of 1977) [1978] TZHC 279 (19 April 1978)

'y•: 'TOiJe O2 TI._ Lip:ll:1L.E J[j::rESDIC IO HIC 0OU.1 9iUTITLI PP5LL 110. 50 3 1977 :0 .121 05i 1976 of the D.ri:. ; Ukovic Di .i:i.ci T,t L.abino Boiorc J. 1 7 " TTT C , T .i.s.atuu.uLp •e•• • . ........ SJ.LLJ.4JJ..U..IJ.11 (Original Tho Lisod) ye r3us TJflI REPUBLIC . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SPOITDETTT (Origin1 roeccutor) CH1.JtGL: Corrupt tranc otin c/s 3 (1) of the Pevntion of Corruption !ct To.l9 of 1971. j 1 D CT 1.1 E T 2 _4 J . The appellant iT.i c',:.lvictod of the o±±.::nce o±' Corrupt ransacion with an agee:.: ontrr o ec:on 3 (1) o the Prevention o± rupti':.o..... 1971. FI. eee: sentenc;.d to the niauin torn of, 3 yearo i.prioonaent. 1Th appoalcd against this c onvic -bior. The presoce.tion cae Sii.lilC and Lhtforv?ard and the oute one do pedod iho Oh . r the cc urt ; 1i tho evidence of the Consa1j1e P.2. . (ri (P.2) vv. 7 io ;.e. o:cered the said br3.bc. P.C. •ri i;rial court eeau on 22/12 1 /76 tlao appo11a.it was .rc:G the Police teOion in cornection ith a etolon rain co -:. T.er....queet±ond hie, The apc11ant said he had bought ii fro.. . one hoF;c no he had forgotten. Thereupon he allowd j; eppolJ_e.nt to go bring this ixrson uid ha h' sic 3 do fo1loi he p?an went but cU.cI .:.c S appear aeOiJ 25/12/i9 :...en ho arrived viith Sias .20/=. ic.ne of::er ... ;o P.C. agri. reie asJ.:od hie. c ccusc ..ii .Cr 0.) t 'fThir. ori t'Dk .noney end call:.d in hi: :,;11naci3.e P.C. c3ai6i Tho itnceeod the £.OflCy. rftL roe11 , charged. In his done . the aop::llanO 3iLap1f d. ... ..i.d giving any .o.oney to P.C. .gori as chai'gr1. Th't like - tj 1 'ag:Lstrato I Cannol; ccc hov; P.0 . ri. C ould have eeaaL1: :etured thie aJ.logati on sgainst thin oorjJ1an. n 3ie cjrev 'e uE1.c , P '3C L1 c1 ed that the ai ellant d i d indeed offer S11 s.20/= P.C. Tngori so that the latter could drop charges agai.n:.t therefore did so corruptly to an - :eit in r:.lation Th the affairn of his principal. The convictions in thc.ee circune'tancoc were proper. The eentcnco - :Lch was iaposod ie the ainiew. under the Ia:. Thccrdingly teLo appeal is diseieced. Delivered in Court a:; 1e.nZa thi.s 19th day of Lpril 1978. UiTZ/ L. I9hpri1173 JUDGE