Mamaila vs Mamaila and Others (41975/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1040 (21 November 2022)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2022 >> [2022] ZAGPJHC 1040 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Mamaila vs Mamaila and Others (41975/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1040 (21 November 2022) Mamaila vs Mamaila and Others (41975/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1040 (21 November 2022) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_1040.html sino date 21 November 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG) Case No: 41975/2020 REPORTABLE: NO. OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO. REVISED. In the matter between: PATRICIA MALULEKE MAMAILA                                  Applicant and MAKOMA MARTHA MAMAILA                                      First Respondent ESTATE LATE MOHALE ENOS                                     Second Respondent MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG                                                          Third Respondent JUDGMENT Todd AJ 1. This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment that I handed down on 13 September 2022.  The application was brought three or four days outside the prescribed period, and the Applicant has applied for condonation of the late filing of the application.  I am satisfied that condonation should be granted. 2. The Applicant seeks leave to appeal on the ground that an appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success as contemplated in section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act.  In assessing prospects of success I follow the approach described in Ramakatsa and others v African National Congress and Another [2021] ZA SCA 31 at para 10. 3. Mr Maleka, who appeared for the Applicant, raised a range of grounds on which he submitted there were reasonable prospects of another court deciding the matter in favour of the Applicant.  These were set out at length in the application for leave to appeal and were elaborated upon by Mr Maleka in oral submissions. 4. I have considered all of these grounds.  On an overall conspectus of the matter, I am not satisfied that an appeal would have reasonable prospects of success in the sense contemplated in section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Courts Act. 5. The application for condonation is granted.  The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.  There is no order as to costs. C Todd Acting Judge of the High Court of South Africa. REFERENCES For the Applicant:                                              Adv. K J Maleka Instructed by:                                                    Leshilo Inc. Attorneys For the First and Second Respondents:           Adv. L Mbhalati Instructed by:                                                    Motanya Madiba Attorneys Hearing date:                                                    17 November 2022 Judgment delivered:                                         21 November 2022 sino noindex make_database footer start