Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others (071891/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 369 (25 April 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 369 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others (071891/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 369 (25 April 2025) Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others (071891/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 369 (25 April 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_369.html sino date 25 April 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case Number: 071891/2023 (1)      REPORTABLE: NO (2)      OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)      REVISED: YES DATE 25 April 2025 SIGNATURE In the matter between: INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE First Applicant #PAYTHEGRANTS Second Applicant and MINISTER OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT First Respondent SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY Second Respondent MINISTER OF FINANCE Third Respondent JUDGMENT TWALA, J [1]      This is a variation order envisaged in terms of Rule 42(1) (b) of the Uniform Rules of Court relating to the judgment I handed down electronically, by circulation to the parties' legal representatives on 18 March 2025. [2]      The Rule provides that the court may, in addition to any other powers it may have, mero motu rescind or vary an order in which there is an ambiguity, or a patent error or omission, but only to the extent of such ambiguity, error or omission. [1] [3]      On 11 April 2025, the respondents brought to my attention that they have served their Notice of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal. However, the Registrar required that the order I previously issued be amended or clarified to facilitate proper processing of the appeal. [4]      In correcting the order of the 18 March 2025 in terms of Rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court, I amend the order to read as follows: 3.1.   The respondents are granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal. 3.2. Costs to be costs in appeal. TWALA M L Judge of the High Court of South Africa Gauteng Division, Pretoria For the Applicants: Advocate J. Brickhill Advocate MBE Mbikiwa Advocate M Kritzinger Instructed by: SERI Law Clinic Tel: 011 356 5860 nkosinathi@seri-sa.org For the First and Second Respondents: Advocate T Ntoane Instructed by: State Attorney – Pretoria Tel: 012 309 1575 Tletageng@justice.gov.za For the Third Respondent: Advocate G Marcus SC Advocate A Friedman Instructed by: State Attorney – Pretoria Tel: 012 309 1575 pheMokoena@justice.gov.za Date of Hearing: DECIDED ON THE PAPERS Date of Judgment: 18 March 2025 Date of amendment: 25 April 2025 Delivered: This judgment and order was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the Parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on Case Lines. The date of the order is deemed to be the 25 April 2025. [1] Rule 42(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules of Court. sino noindex make_database footer start