Fisher and Others v Ramatibela and Others (2024-089598) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1087 (26 September 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 1087 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Fisher and Others v Ramatibela and Others (2024-089598) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1087 (26 September 2025) Fisher and Others v Ramatibela and Others (2024-089598) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1087 (26 September 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_1087.html sino date 26 September 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO.: 2024-089598 (1)      REPORTABLE: NO (2)      OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)      REVISED: NO Date: 26 September 2025 E van der Schyff In the matter between PUSO FISHER                                                          FIRST APPLICANT REBECCA MATHE                                                    SECOND APPLICANT MARY FISHER                                                          THIRD APPLICANT and MOSES RAMATIBELA                                              FIRST RESPONDENT MICHAEL MOTHIBE                                                 SECOND RESPONDENT ROBBY SIKWANE                                                    THIRD RESPONDENT STANLEY BODIBE                                                    FOURTH RESPONDENT MOGODOPI MOREMI                                               FIFTH RESPONDENT MARIA RAKITLA                                                       SIXTH RESPONDENT PIET RAKITLA                                                          SEVENTH RESEPONDENT JOEL SINDANE                                                        EIGHTH RESPONDENT ELLEN MAKUBETSI MORIFI                                     NINTH RESPONDENT ELIZABETH SKOSANA                                             TENTH RESPONDENT THABISO MATOME                                                  ELEVENTH RESPONDENT BOITUMELO MOHOLOENG MATHULOE                  TWELFTH RESPONDENT KATLEGO MOGAPI                                                 THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT MARTHA MOKOENA                                                FOURTEENTH RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J [1] The applicants appeared in person, with the first applicant the spokesperson. The applicants informed the court that they want to intervene in a rescission application brought under the same case number that is enrolled for hearing on the unopposed motion roll on 29 September 2025. [2] The application was opposed by the first, second, third and fifth respondents. The eleventh and thirteenth respondents appeared in person. They informed the court that they were not served timeously with the application. [3] The joinder application is intrinsically linked to the rescission application. Due to the limited time frames within which the joinder application was brought and the fact that the rescission application is enrolled for 29 September 2025, I am of the view that both applications must be heard simultaneously. I am not inclined to make a final order and the application is to be referred to be heard in the unopposed motion court on 29 September 2025. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The joinder application by the intervening parties is referred to be heard on the unopposed motion roll of 29 September 2025. The parties must appear before Van der Westhuizen J for directions. 2. Costs reserved. E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered: This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. In the event that there is a discrepancy between the date the judgment is signed and the date it is uploaded to CaseLines, the date the judgment is uploaded to CaseLines is deemed to be the date that the judgment is handed down. The applicants: In person For the 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd and 5th respondents: Adv. C. Smit Instructed by: Serfontein, Viljoen & Swart The 11 th and 14 th respondents: In person Date of the hearing: 26 September 2025 Date of judgment: 26 September 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start