Case Law[2025] ZAGPPHC 1247South Africa
Pertronella v Nedbank Ltd (46179/2014) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1247 (12 November 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
12 November 2025
Headnotes
28-10-2025 NUMBER OF pages : 3 TRANSCRIBER:
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPPHC 1247
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Pertronella v Nedbank Ltd (46179/2014) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1247 (12 November 2025)
Pertronella v Nedbank Ltd (46179/2014) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1247 (12 November 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_1247.html
sino date 12 November 2025
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
# GAUTENG DIVISION,
PRETORIA
GAUTENG DIVISION,
PRETORIA
CASE
NO
: 46179/2014
DATE
:
28-10-2025
(1) REPORTABLE:
YES
/ NO
(2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES
:
YES
/ NO
(3) REVISED
12/11/2025
In the matter between
ZIMEMA NELISIWE PERTRONELLA
and
NEDBANK LTD
JUDGMENT
VAN
DER WESTHUIZEN AJ
: In matter
46179/2014 the matter between Zimema NP versus Nedbank LTD, there is,
an application, now belatedly sought to
obtain leave to appeal
against a written judgment. In an application for recission of
judgment. My Judgment was delivered
during October 2023, refusing the
application for recission. What transpired was that, once the
respondent obtained a judgment
against the present applicant in
respect of a foreclosure, the respondent, abandoned that portion of
the judgment and matters were
then to have proceeded on an opposed
application for foreclosure. As already recorded, that judgment
that I delivered on
or about 23 October 2023, has effectively become
moot. Matters have proceeded and in view thereof that the
judgment in respect
of the initial foreclosure application was
abandoned by the respondent, there was no reason why this application
for leave to appeal
should proceed. This matter was before me
in the beginning of this year wherein the applicant sought leave to
belatedly continue
with the application for leave to appeal.
Certain terms were set that had to be met. The order also
included time periods
in respect of which the parties, and particular
the applicant, were to file the necessary affidavits in the
foreclosure application,
which is presently pending. For all
intents and purposes, there is no merit in the present application
for leave to appeal.
The applicant still has the opportunity to
oppose the 'new' foreclosure application, but it would be a futile
exercise to grant
any leave to appeal the refusal of the recission
application now. The application for leave to appeal was
originally set
down to be heard during the course of last week, but
at a late stage the applicant sought that the matter rather be heard
on another
date. The date that was set was today. The
applicant acknowledged that the matter was set down for 09:00 this
morning,
yet there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant.
It follows that there could be no prospects of success in respect of
any possible appeal against the judgment of October 2023 and it will
have no effect, accordingly the application for leave to appeal
is
dismissed with cost.
…………………………
..
VAN DER WESTHUIZEN AJ
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
DATE
:
…………………
TRANSCRIBER’S CERTIFICATE
ZIMEMA NEKISIWE
PERTRONELLA//NEDBANK LTD
I,
the undersigned, hereby certify that
so far as it is audible to
me
, the aforegoing is a true and correct transcript of the
proceedings recorded by means of a digital recorder in the matter
between
the parties stated above:
CASE
NUMBER
: 46179/2014
RECORDED
AT
: PRETORIA
DATE
HELD
: 28-10-2025
NUMBER
OF pages
:
3
TRANSCRIBER:
Liesel Halse
DATE
COMPLETED:
29-10-2025
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Passano v Erasmus (A163/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 249 (12 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 249High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
South African Professional Firearms Trainers Council NPC v Quality Council for Trades and Occupations and Others (097482/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1388 (2 October 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1388High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar
Pieterse and Others v Organic Synthesis (Pty) Ltd and Another (61861/2017) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1195 (14 November 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1195High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar
Perumal v Janse Van Rensburg N.O and Others (081849/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 145 (18 February 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 145High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar
S.T v N.P.S and Another (068777/25) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1076 (25 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 1076High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar