Registrar of Animal Improvement v Chianian Cattle Breeders' Society of South Africa (60618/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 276 (19 March 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 276 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Registrar of Animal Improvement v Chianian Cattle Breeders' Society of South Africa (60618/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 276 (19 March 2024) Registrar of Animal Improvement v Chianian Cattle Breeders' Society of South Africa (60618/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 276 (19 March 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_276.html sino date 19 March 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case No:  60618/2022 (1)          REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2)          OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO (3)          REVISED. DATE: 19 March 2024 SIGNATURE In the matter between: THE REGISTRAR OF ANIMAL IMPROVEMENT Applicant and THE CHIANINA CATTLE BREEDERS’ SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA Respondent JUDGMENT HF JACOBS, AJ: [1] The first respondent in the main application (the Registrar) applies for leave to appeal against the judgment of 16 February 2024.  The principles applicable to applications for leave to appeal are set out in Hunter [1] . [2] The grounds for appeal listed in the applicants “Notice of Appeal” dated 1 March 2024 and the written submissions contained in its heads of argument amplified by the oral submissions made in support of the application for leave to appealgffr revisit those points dealt with in the main judgment and I do not intend dealing with each point again in this application. [3] In my opinion the proposed appeal has no prospect of success and there exists no compelling reason why leave to appeal should be granted. [4] The application for leave to appeal is refused with costs. H F JACOBS ACTING Judge of the High Court GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Delivered: This judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ legal representatives by e-mail.  The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 14h00 on the 19 th of March 2024. APPERANCES Applicant’s counsel: Adv SL Shangisa SC Adv L Rakgwale Applicant’s attorneys: State Attorney Respondent’s counsel: Adv H De Wet SC Respondent’s attorneys: Van Heerden’s Incorporated [1] Hunter v Financial Services Board 2017 JBR 0941 (GP); Caratco (Pty) Ltd v Independent Advisory (Pty) Ltd 2020 (5) SA 35 (SCA); Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Southern Africa Litigation Centre and Others 2016 (3) SA 317 (SCA); sino noindex make_database footer start