Biccard N.O and Others v Ndwandwe and Others (2023-033422) [2024] ZAGPPHC 973 (30 September 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 973 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Biccard N.O and Others v Ndwandwe and Others (2023-033422) [2024] ZAGPPHC 973 (30 September 2024) Biccard N.O and Others v Ndwandwe and Others (2023-033422) [2024] ZAGPPHC 973 (30 September 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_973.html sino date 30 September 2024 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO.: 2023-033422 (1)    REPORTABLE: NO (2)    OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)    REVISED: NO Date:30 September 2024 E van der Schyff In the matter between: BIANCA TIANA BICCARD N.O.                                                     FIRST APPLICANT ATHOLL DAVID VICTOR LIEBMAN N.O. SECOND APPLICANT JAQUELINE JUNE LIEBMAN GENTILE N.O. THIRD APPLICANT and JOHANNES OUPA NDWANDWE                                            FIRST RESPONDENT THEMBA HENDRY MKHBELA                                           SECOND RESPONDENT BRADLEY BRETT LIEBMAN N.O.                                          THIRD RESPONDENT ANDREA LIEBMAN N.O.                                                     FOURTH RESPONDENT JONATHAN HUGH STEPHENS                                               FIFTH RESPONDENT ANGELENE POOLE N.O.                                                        SIXTH RESPONDENT JANETTA EVELYN CARR N.O.                                         SEVENTH RESPONDENT PUMEZO DAVID N.O.                                                           EIGHTH RESPONDENT MURRAY JAMES BARNETSON N.O.                                     NINTH RESPONDENT KANABO GUGULETHU SKHOSANA N.O.                           TENTH RESPONDENT THE MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA                                                                     ELEVENTH RESPONDENT THE COMPANIES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMISSION                                             TWELFTH RESPONDENT CHRISTIANA BICCARD                                            THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J [1] I handed down a written judgment in this matter on 19 August 2024. The applicants filed an application for leave to appeal, which was heard on 16 September 2024. [2] The applicants raised numerous grounds of appeal. They supplemented their grounds by filing a notice expressing that I was biased against them. [3] After considering the papers filed in the application, the judgment, and the grounds of appeal, I am of the opinion that the appeal does not have a reasonable prospect of success. The written judgment contains the reasons for the order handed down on 19 August 2024, and I need not elaborate on this. [4] The application for leave to appeal stands to be dismissed. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, costs of counsel on scale B. E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered:  This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. As a courtesy gesture, it will be emailed to the parties/their legal representatives. For the applicants: J.L. Kaplan With: E. Dreyer Instructed by: Aaron Stanger & Associates For the first and second respondents: E.R. Venter Instructed by: JHS Attorneys Date of the hearing: 16 September 2024 Date of judgment: 30 September 2024 sino noindex make_database footer start