Joffe and Others v Farley NO and Others (Erratum) (083964/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1065 (23 October 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 1065 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Joffe and Others v Farley NO and Others (Erratum) (083964/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1065 (23 October 2024) Joffe and Others v Farley NO and Others (Erratum) (083964/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1065 (23 October 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_1065.html sino date 23 October 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case no: 083964/2023 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED: YES DATE: 23 October 2024 SIGNATURE: In the matter between: ANNAMARIE JOFFE ������������������������������������������������������������������� ��� First Applicant JACQULINE BARCLAY ����������������������������������������������������� ��������� Second Applicant JASON MICHAEL JOFFE ������������������������������������������������������������ �� Third Applicant and ROBERTO CAROLO FARLEY NO ������������������������������������� ��������� First Respondent TSHENOLO FARLEY NO �������������������������������������������������� ���� Second Respondent ROBERTO CAROLO FARLEY �������������������������������� ��������������������Third Respondent TSHENOLO FARLEY ��������������������������������������������� ��������� �������Fourth Respondent ANOINETTE FRANCES FARLEY ��������������������������������������� ��������� Fifth Respondent JOHANNES JACOBUS ROSSOUW NO ����������������������������� �������� Sixth Respondent MASTER OF THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT ����������������������������������������������� ��� ������������������������� ����Seventh Respondent ERRATUM JUDGMENT NEUKIRCHER J : In the judgment and order handed down on 21 October 2024 paragraph 5 and 6 of the order states: �5.������� The first and second respondents are removed as trustees of the Trust and the fourth respondent is ordered to cancel the letters of authority dated 20 October 2014 authorising the first and second respondents to act. 6. The fourth respondent is directed to provide the applicants and the proposed independent trustee with letters of authority authorising them to act as trustees of the Trust.� The reference to the fourth respondent is a patent error as it is only the Master of the High Court that can perform these functions. I hereby correct this in terms of the provisions of Rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court. Order: Paragraph 5 and 6 of the order of the judgment handed down on 21 October 2024 is amended to read as follows: �5.������� The first and second respondents are removed as trustees of the Trust and the seventh respondent is ordered to cancel the letters of authority dated 20 October 2014 authorising the first and second respondents to act. 6. The seventh respondent is directed to provide the applicants and the proposed independent trustee with letters of authority authorising them to act as trustees of the Trust.� NEUKIRCHER J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA sino noindex make_database footer start