Motseo and Another v Monama N.O and Others (Leave to Appeal) (38707/2020) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1124 (8 November 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 1124 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Motseo and Another v Monama N.O and Others (Leave to Appeal) (38707/2020) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1124 (8 November 2024) Motseo and Another v Monama N.O and Others (Leave to Appeal) (38707/2020) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1124 (8 November 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_1124.html sino date 8 November 2024 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE Number: 38707/2020 (1)      REPORTABLE: YES /NO (2)      OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES /NO (3)      REVISED: YES /NO 2024 In the matters between: - AB STEPHEN PHETEDI MOTSEO                                                       FIRST APPLICANT ROSSIE THLAISHEGO MOTSEO                                                    SECOND APPLICANT and LUCY MAKHADA MONAMA N.O. FIRST RESPONDENT LUCY MAKHADA MONAMA SECOND RESPONDENT NEDBANK LTD                                                                                 THIRD RESPONDENT REGISTRAR OF DEEDS                                                              FOURTH RESPONDENT CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY                                                                                 FIFTH RESPONDENT JUDGMENT (APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) BAQWA, J Introduction [1] The applicants seek leave to appeal against the judgment of this court handed down on 27 May 2024. [2] The grounds for leave to appeal have been fully ventilated in both parties heads of argument. [3] Section 17 (1) of The Superior Courts Act (“the Act”) provides that leave to appeal may only be granted where the judge or judges concerned are of the opinion that; “ (a) …………………. (i) The appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success; or (ii) These is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard, including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration.” [4] After considering all the submissions, I am satisfied that the applicants have satisfied the requirements of section 17 (1) (a) of the Act regarding the prospects of success on appeal. [5] Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is granted to the full court of appeal of the Gauteng Division. Costs are costs in the appeal. SELBY BAQWA JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Date of hearing:  08 November 2024 Date of judgment: 08 November 2024 Appearance On behalf of the Applicants Adv J Delport delport@clubadvocates.co.za On behalf of the Respondents Adv RS Mafuyeka sipho@mafuyeka.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start