Pillay and Another v Muthray and Associates Incorporated and Others (Leave to Appeal) (081393/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1249 (5 December 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 1249 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Pillay and Another v Muthray and Associates Incorporated and Others (Leave to Appeal) (081393/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1249 (5 December 2024) Pillay and Another v Muthray and Associates Incorporated and Others (Leave to Appeal) (081393/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1249 (5 December 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_1249.html sino date 5 December 2024 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO.:081393/2024 (1)    REPORTABLE: NO (2)    OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)    REVISED: NO Date: 5 December 2024 E van der Schyff In the application for leave to appeal between: Vigneshvarie Pillay                                                                                          First Applicant Thomson Wilks Incorporated                                                                      Second Applicant and Muthray and Associates Incorporated                                                         First Respondent Kineil Muthray                                                                                        Second Respondent ABSA BANK Ltd                                                                                        Third Respondent Keshan Pillay                                                                                           Fourth Respondent JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J [1] The applicants in this application for leave to appeal were the second and third respondents in the main application. The parties are referred to as cited in this application for leave to appeal. The applicants seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order delivered on 17 September 2024. [2] I have considered the grounds for appeal noted in the application for leave to appeal. I handed down a written judgment in the matter concerned that set out the reasons for my decision. After having reflected on the papers filed of record, the judgment and order handed down, and the grounds for appeal, I am not of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success if leave is granted. There is no other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The application for leave to appeal by the first and second applicants (the second and third respondents in the main application) is dismissed with costs on scale A. E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered:  This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. For the first and second applicants: Adv. C. Woodrow Instructed by: Thomson Wilk Incorporated For the first and second respondents: Adv. E. de Lange Instructed by: Muthray and Associates Date of the hearing: 20 November 2024 Date of judgment: 5 December 2024 sino noindex make_database footer start