Case Law[2023] ZAWCHC 153South Africa
Kujawa N.O obo M.N v Road Accident Fund (18198/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 153 (19 June 2023)
Headnotes
as follows:
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAWCHC 153
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Kujawa N.O obo M.N v Road Accident Fund (18198/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 153 (19 June 2023)
Kujawa N.O obo M.N v Road Accident Fund (18198/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 153 (19 June 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAWCHC/Data/2023_153.html
sino date 19 June 2023
####
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
####
####
#### IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
#### (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION,
CAPE TOWN)
(WESTERN CAPE DIVISION,
CAPE TOWN)
Case
Number: 18189/2018
In
the matter between:
Ralph
Kujawa N.O. obo M[…] N[…]
Plaintiff
And
Road
Accident Fund
Defendant
JUDGMENT
ELECTRONICALLY DELIVERED
19
JUNE 2023
Baartman,
J
[1]
On 26 September 2018, the
plaintiff instituted action proceedings claiming damages on behalf of
a minor who had sustained injuries
in an accident. I presided over
the pretrial
[1]
proceedings in
which the parties
disclosed
that
they
had
reached
settlement
[2]
in
respect
of
all
the heads of damages except the date from which interest should run.
Despite a further opportunity to resolve the outstanding
issue,
agreement was not reached; they therefore agreed to argue that issue
before me.
[2]
The Road Accident Fund
(the RAF)
presented the offer without making provision
for interest. The plaintiff was satisfied with the offer and on 2
March 2022 submitted
to the RAF a draft order in which it provided
for interest to accrue on the capital from 14 days of the court order
to date of
payment. In addition, the draft order provided for
interest on the claimant's costs from 14 days of the agreement or
taxation to
date of payment. The plaintiff submitted the draft order
instead of signing the written Offer and Acceptance of Offer from the
RAF. On 6 March 2023, the RAF accepted the draft order but proposed
that interest run from 180 days instead of 14 days.
[3]
The parties requested a ruling on the following issue:
'what was the appropriate date from which interest on the capital and
costs
should run'. Section 17(3)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56
of 1996
(the Act)
provides
as follows:
'17(3)(a) No.
interest calculated on the amount of any compensation
which a court awards to any third party by virtue of the provisions
of subsection
(1) shall be payable unless 14 days
elapsed from the date of the court's relevant order.'
[4]
The plaintiff submitted that as the defendant's
'discharge did not stipulate that interest would run from 180
days,...the default
position as stipulated in terms of [the Act]
remains applicable.' On the contrary, the
defendant
submitted
that
the
'lis
between
the
parties
has
been
extinguished by agreement and section 17(3)(a) the Act does not
apply.'
[5]
The 180-day deferment was
introduced,
Legal
Practice Council
[3]
,
as a
temporary measure suspending writs of attachment for 180 days from
date of the court order.
The
court held as follows:
'[35] I am of the view
that exceptional circumstances exist, taking into account the
interest of justice, for the exercise of this
court's inherent common
law and constitutional power to order a temporary suspension for a
limited period of 180 days as from the
day when argument before this
court was concluded on 16 March 2021, of all writs of execution and
attachments against the RAF based
on court orders already granted or
settlements already reached in terms of the RAF Act, which are not
older than 180 days as from
the date of the court order or date of
the settlement reached.'
[6]
Importantly, the court
was not dealing with an application for the stay of payments or the
payment of interest. The RAF only sought
a stay of attachments to
enable it to make payments. It is clear from
Dunn
[4]
that agreement in respect
of the capital did not necessarily result in agreement in respect of
interest. The court held as follows:
'[18] The applicant
accepted a late payment, without raising the issue that it was
entitled to interest from the date of judgment.
It is surprising that
the applicant did not raise the issue of interest as the
circumstances of payment were different in that
payment of the
capital amount was deferred to a later date, unlike in other RAF
court orders, where
mora
interest runs from fourteen (14) days
after the date of judgment.'
[7]
In
Dunn,
the
court held that it was not apparent from the agreement that the
parties had intended that interest should run from 14 days after
judgment. In those circumstances, the court ruled that it would run
only from the date when the RAF failed to make payment
in
terms
of the order. As indicated above, the
plaintiff raised the issue of interest from the outset; the parties
were unable to settle and
so
approached
the court for a ruling. The legal
position is that section 17(3)(a) of the Act regulates the issue in
the absence of agreement to
the contrary. The defendant submitted
that this court has a wide discretion in circumstances where 'the
lis'
between the
parties has been settled. The payment of interest is part of that
'lis'
but has not been
settled. The parties have not agreed on the date from which interest
should run and the court cannot make an agreement
for them. In the
absence of a substantive application, this court lacks jurisdiction
to entertain the request to alter the legislative
regime applicable
and does not have the wide discretion the RAF contends for.
Conclusion
[8]
It follows that the legal position as per the Act must
be applied and that interest should run from 14 days after the date
of this
order in respect of the capital and 14 days from date they
reach agreement in respect of costs or taxation.
[9]
I, therefore, grant the order per Annexure A hereto.
Baartman,
J
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(WESTERN
CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
#### CASE NO. 18189/2018
CASE NO. 18189/2018
DATE:19/6/2023
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE JUDGE BAARTMAN
In
the matter between:
#### RALPH
KUJAWA (N.O) obo M[…] N[…]
RALPH
KUJAWA (N.O) obo M[…] N[…]
#### Plaintiff
Plaintiff
And
THE
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
Defendant
DRAFT
ORDER
IN
FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S DELICTUAL CLAIMS HEREIN
AND ARISING OUT OF THE COLLISION ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2015 ("THE
COLLISION"), IT IS ORDERED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT
THE DEFENDANT SHALL:
THE
CAPITAL
1.1
Pay
to the Plaintiff the
sum
of R1 576 786.65
(one
million
five hundred
and seventy six
thousand seven hundred and eighty six rand and sixty five cents)
("the capital"), to be paid within 180
(one hundred and
eighty)
calendar days of this order.
1.2
It
is
recorded
that
the
Plaintiff
will
not
issue
a
Writ
of
Execution
in
respect
of
the capital amount prior to the
expiry of the 180 days.
1.3
Defendant
shall
be
liable
for
interest
on
the
capital
at
the
prescribed
rate
of interest from fourteen court
days of this order to date of payment.
THE
UNDERTAKING
2.
Provide an undertaking in terms of Section 17(4)(a) of
the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
(“the
undertaking"),
to compensate the
Plaintiff for 100% (one hundred per centum) of the costs relating to
the future accommodation of M[…] N[…]
in a hospital or
nursing home or treatment of or rendering of a service or supplying
of goods to M[…] N[…] after
the said costs have been
incurred and on proof thereof and arising from the collision which
occurred on 1 September 2015.
COSTS
3.
Pay the Plaintiffs taxed or agreed costs on the High
Court Scale, as between
party and party to date
hereof, including for the sake of clarity, but not limited to, the
costs as set out hereunder.
GENERAL
COSTS
4.
Any costs
attendant
upon
the obtaining
of payment
of
the amount
referred to
in
paragraph 1.1.
5.1
Pay the taxed or agreed fees, of the expert witnesses
listed herein below ("the experts"), as well as any agreed
or taxed
costs attached to the procurement of medico-legal/expert
reports listed hereinafter, including the taxed or agreed costs of
Plaintiff
attending all his medico-legal examinations:
5.2
The experts are
5.2.1
Dr. PA Olivier;
5.2.2
Keith Cronwright.
5.2.3
Marion Fourie;
5.2.4
Dawie Malherbe;
5.2.5
ARCH Actuarial consulting.
COSTS
OF CURATOR AD LITEM
6.1
Defendant shall pay the costs of the application
to appoint a Curator Ad Litem on the High Court scale, as between
party and party,
as taxed or agreed, plus VAT, including the
qualifying expenses of any expert witnesses used in such application
(the amount of
such qualifying expenses to be assessed by the Taxing
Master).
6.2
Defendant shall pay the costs of the Curator Ad
Litem on the High Court scale, as between party and party, as taxed
or agreed, plus
VAT.
COSTS
OF CURATOR BONIS
7.
In the event of the High Court appointing a Curator
Bonis to M[...] N[...], the Defendant shall pay the costs of an
application
to appoint a Curator Banis on the High Court scale, as
between party and party, as taxed or agreed, plus VAT, including the
qualifying
expenses of any expert witnesses used in such application
(the amount of such qualifying expenses to be assessed by the Taxing
Master).
8.
In
the event of the High Court appointing
a Curator
Banis to the M[...] N[...], the Defendant shall pay the costs of the
Curator Bonis, as taxed or agreed, which shall form
part of the
undertaking to be furnished by the Defendant, such costs including,
for the sake of clarity, but not limited to:
8.1
the remuneration of such Curator Bonis (after proof that
such curator has been appointed has been furnished to the Defendant)
in
administering the estate of the M[...] N[...], according to the
prescribed tariff, as approved by the Master of the High Court.
8.2
the costs incurred in administering the undertaking, as
and when these costs arise and subject to the approval by the Master.
8.3
the costs, if any, incurred by the Curator Bonis in
furnishing security to the Master.
PAYMENT
PROVISIONS
9.
The payment provisions in respect of the aforegoing are
agreed as follows:
9.1
Payment
of the amount reflected in paragraph 1 above shall be effected direct
to Plaintiff's attorneys·of record by means
of an electronic
transfer.
9.2
Payment
of the taxed or agreed costs reflected in paragraph 3 above shall be
effected within 180 (one hundred and eighty) calendar
days of
agreement or taxation ("due date") and shall likewise be
effected by electronic transfer into the Plaintiff's
attorneys trust
banking account.
9.3
In
the event that the costs are not agreed, Plaintiff shall serve a
Notice of Intention to tax bill of costs on the Defendant.
9.4
Defendant
shall be liable for interest on amount referred to in paragraph 9.2
at the prescribed rate of interest from fourteen court
days of
agreement or taxation.
ACCOUNT
DETAILS
10.
The Plaintiff's attorneys' trust banking account details
are as follows:
Bank:
FIRST
NATIONAL BANK
Account
Name:
LESTER
& ASSOCIATES
Account
Type:
TRUST
ACCOUNT
Branch
Name:
PLUMSTEAD
Branch
Code:
201109
### Account
number:
Account
number:
### 501[…]
501[…]
By
Order of the Court
####
OFFER
&
ACCEPTANCE OF
SETTLEMENT
"Without
Prejudice"
LESTER
&
ASSOCIATES
Date: 2023/02/23
Docex:
Per Telefax: 0217974912
Dear
Sir/Madam
The
RAF hereby offers, without prejudice or admission of liability, in
full and final settlement of your claim, the amount as
set
out
hereunder:
CLAIMANT
:
KUJAWA,RWM
YOUR
REF :
MNOMDOE
OUR
REF:
503/12393281/10/0
Link
No:3887919
Version
No:2
SECTION
A:
CAPITAL
PAYMENT
DETAILS
AND
BREADOWN
PAST
FUTURE
TOTAL
HOSPITAL/MEDICAL EXPENSES
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
LOSS OF SUPPORT
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
LOSS OF EARNINGS
R 0.00
R 976 786.65
R976 786.65
FUNERAL COSTS
R 0.00
GENERAL DAMAGES (Pain &
Suffering, Permanent disability, etc.)
R600 000.00
SUB-TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
Minus : Apportionment
Percentage: 0%
R 0.00
SUB-TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
Minus : Risks
Percentage: 0%
R 0.00
SUB-TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
Minus : Interim Payment(s)
R 0.00
SUB-TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
Minus : WCC Award (Workmans
Comoensation)
R 0.00
SUB-TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
GRAND TOTAL
R 1 576 786.65
An
undertaking
in
terms
of
Section
17
(4)(a)
Note
that the above offer is conditional until the RAF receives
confirmation of a the existence of a contingency agreement.
SECTION
B:
CAPITAL
Payment
for the capital sum of
R 1
576
786.65
will take
place 180 days from the receipt of this form signed by the
Claimant/Representative. RAF captures all settled claims in
30 days
and payment thereof is effected in 180 days from date of settlement
or court order.
SECTION
C: COSTS
Payment of the Claimant's taxed or
agreed party and party costs, on the appropriate scale, will be paid
on the 180th day of the
month following the settlement of the costs.
SECTION
D: ACCOUNT DETAILS NOMINATED FOR PURPOSES OF
RECEIVING
PAYMENT
Name
of
Account:
LESTER&
ASSOCIATES
Holder
Branch:
250655 FIRST
NATIONAL CUSTOMER COMPUTER SERVlCES
Type
of Account :
CQ
CHEQUE ACCOUNT
Account
Number:
501[…]
I
warrant that the nominated account details are true
and correct, I
further agree to indemnify
the RAF against any demands, claims or
actions
that may arise due to the RAF making payment
into
the nominated account
.
I
warrant that I have fully disclosed to the RAF all costs due to any
supplier.
I
further warrant that where I am entitled to payment under the
Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act., ex contractu/lege payments
by my employer, pension/provident fund payments, insurance payments,
medical aid/insurance payments, any benefit from the state/social
services or any other collateral or accelerated benefit, I have fully
info1med the RAF of all payments received and to be received.
I
understand the meaning and extent of this Offer and Acceptance Notice
and confirm that it records the full and final agreement
between the
RAF and me. the RAF is discharged from all liability pertaining to
the loss suffered in the above mentioned accident.
This
offer can only be accepted by full completion and on receipt of the
signed original document. Any amendment to this form will
not
constitute settlement of this claim unless such amendment is
expressly agreed on by the Fund.
This
offer is only valid for a period of 30 days from date of offer, or
until the date preceding the date of prescription of the
claim,
whichever date occurs first.
If
this offer was made after prescription of the claim, it will be
deemed to be a bona fide error and acceptance thereof will
not
be enforceable.
The
RAF further reserves its right to withdraw this offer at its own
discretion at any time before acceptance.
Payments
will
only be
made
in
dedicated Trust
Accounts
and not
a
transmission
bank
account.
Proof
of banking
details may
be
required.
The
offer
is
subject to
confirmation
regarding
the
Contingency
Fee
Agreement concluded with
the claimant
and
proof
of
compliance
with
section
4
of
the
Contingency Fee
Act;
(Proof
should
be
either
two
2
affidavits,
i.e. the
affidavit by
the
attorney
and the
affidavit
by the
claimant (not 1 affidavit but both affidavits) alternatively proof of
submission of the 2 affidavits to the Legal Practice
Council or proof
that both affidavits were filed with the court and /or where there is
no contingency fee agreement in place, it
must be recorded as such in
the court order.
Alternatively, the attorney must
submit an affidavit to confirm that there is no contingency fee
agreement.
Acceptance
of
this
offer
will
only
be
deemed
valid
acceptance
if
it
is
accepted
in
its
totality.
An
acceptance
on
one
or more aspects of the offer
(such as merits or quantum only or only selected heads of quantum)
will be regarded as a counter offer
by the claimant, and will not be
deemed to constitute a valid agreement, unless the Road Accident Fund
expressly accepts the counter
offer.
SIGNED
AT
ON THIS
DAY OF
CLAIMANT/REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE
*PRACTICE NUMBER
•
Supply
if
signed
by
Legal
Representative
on
behalf
of
Claimant
AS
WITNESSES: 1.
2.
Prepared
By:
NOKWANDA MASINGA
e-mail:
NOKWANDAM@RAF.CO.ZA
2023/02/23
SIGNATURE
OF THE PREPARER
DATE PREPARED
Cape
Town: 1 Thibault Square 7
th
Floor Long Street Cape Town
8001 PO Box 2443 Cape Town 0000
T
+27
21 408 3300
www.raf.co.za
Board
Members
:
D
r
Peter
Mathebula
(Chairperson),
Ms
Koko Mashigo—Mokgalong
(Vice-Chairperson),
Dr
Fanie
Bale,
Ms
Dineo
Molefe,
Dr Nomonde MabUya-Moloele, Mr
Khotso Mothoti,
Mr
Moses
Nyama,
Dr
Maria Peenze, Dr
Mohamed Fazel Randera, Mr Thulani Tshabalala, Ms Constance Maleho
(Director General's Representative)
[1]
Uniform
Rules of Court,
rule
37.
[2]
On 23 February 2023, the defendant offered in full and final
settlement of the plaintiff's claim; (a) Payment of R1 576 786.65
in
respect of the plaintiff's heads of damages;
(b)
Payment of the capital sum to be effected 180 days from date of
settlement or court order;
Payment
of the claimant's taxed or agreed party and party costs, on the
appropriate scale, on the 180th day of the month following
the
settlement of the costs.
[3]
Road
Accident Fund v Legal Practice Council and Others
2021
(6) SA 230 (GP).
[4]
Dunn v
Road Accident Fund
2019
(1) SA 237
(KZD).
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Kama v Minister of Police (13384/17) [2023] ZAWCHC 180 (20 January 2023)
[2023] ZAWCHC 180High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)99% similar
Mokweni and Others v Plaatjies and Others - Appeal (A178/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 266 (26 October 2023)
[2023] ZAWCHC 266High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)99% similar
W.M.R v A.L.R and Others (12205/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 107 (13 April 2023)
[2023] ZAWCHC 107High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)98% similar
N-A.K v T.P.K and Others (2503/2020) [2024] ZAWCHC 297 (25 September 2024)
[2024] ZAWCHC 297High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)98% similar
Nkosi and Another v S (A260/2021) [2022] ZAWCHC 50 (19 April 2022)
[2022] ZAWCHC 50High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)98% similar