africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2025] ZAKZDHC 58South Africa

Workforce Staffing (Pty) Ltd v RK Structures CC and Another (Leave to Appeal) (D981/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 58 (11 September 2025)

High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)
6 March 2025
RYAN J, MOODLEY AJ, Parktown J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban South Africa: Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAKZDHC 58 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Workforce Staffing (Pty) Ltd v RK Structures CC and Another (Leave to Appeal) (D981/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 58 (11 September 2025) Workforce Staffing (Pty) Ltd v RK Structures CC and Another (Leave to Appeal) (D981/2023) [2025] ZAKZDHC 58 (11 September 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAKZDHC/Data/2025_58.html sino date 11 September 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN CASE NO.: 0981/2023 In the matter between: WORKFORCE STAFFING (PTY) LTD                         APPLICANT and RK STRUCTURES CC                                                 FIRST RESPONDENT RYAN JOHN KLOPPER                                               SECOND RESPONDENT ORDER The following order shall issue: (1)       The Second Respondent is granted leave to appeal to the Full Court of the KwaZulu­ Natal Provisional Division. (2)       The cost of the application for leave to appeal shall be costs in the appeal, save that should the Second Respondent not proceed with the appeal, the Second Respondent is to pay these costs. JUDGMENT MOODLEY AJ [1]        This is an application for leave to appeal brought by the Second Respondent in the judgment I handed down on 06 March 2025 (hereinafter referred to as "the Judgment") wherein judgment was granted against the Second Respondent. The effect of the Judgment was that the Second Respondent was found to be jointly and severally liable to the Applicant for a debt incurred by the First Respondent. [2]        The Second Respondent contends that I erred in finding that the written statement/s made on behalf of both the First and Second Respondents in the written heads of argument prepared by counsel who had previously acted on the behalf of the Second Respondent as being binding admissions of fact binding the Second Respondent. I shall not repeat the grounds of appeal herein. [3]        The Applicant opposes the application for leave to appeal on the basis that it submits that the Second Respondent does not meet the statutory test that it is compelled to, that being" the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success ", and that the Judgment is indeed correct. [4]        Both parties produced heads of argument in the matter and aired their contentions at the hearing of the matter as to how the statement/s on the relevant heads of argument should have been categorised, and the weight that ought to have been attached to such. They further addressed me on what the finding should have been had the statement/s not been categorised as admission/s, and the matter determined on the merits. [5]        I have fully considered the grounds raised to appeal the judgment and the submissions made by the parties. I am persuaded that the appeal would have reasonable prospects of success. ORDER [6]        Accordingly, the following order is made:- (a)     The Second Respondent is granted leave to appeal to the Full Court of the KwaZulu- Natal Provisional Division. (b)     The cost of the application for leave to appeal shall be costs in the appeal, save that should the Second Respondent not proceed with the appeal, the Secon Respondent to pay these costs. M MOODLEY AJ Case information Date of hearing:                   5 September 2025 Date of judgment:                11 September 2025 Counsel for the First Respondent/Applicant:      Mr D Aldworth Email: aldworth@dbnbar.co.za Attorneys for the First Respondent/Applicant:    Futcher and Poppesqou Attorneys Unit 8, Level 2 30 Meridian Drive Umhlanga New Town Centre Umhlanga Rocks Email: admin@fpattorneys.co.za Counsel for the Applicant/Respondent:               Mr N Alli Attorneys for the Applicant/Respondent:             Hunts Attorneys (inc Borkums) 2 nd Floor, 13 Wellington Road Parktown Johannesburg Tel: 011 532 0250 Email: almadk@huntsattorneys.co.za REF: ALMAJVR/MAT 3865 C/O Strauss Daly Inc. 09 th Floor , Strauss Daly Place 41 Richefond Circle, Umhlanga Ridge Durban Ref: S SINGH/AB/HUN97/0009 Email: SSingh2@straussdaly.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

SCIP Engineering (Pty) Ltd v University of Zululand (D8423/24) [2025] ZAKZDHC 56 (5 September 2025)
[2025] ZAKZDHC 56High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)96% similar
Educor Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Bowwood and Main 131 (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Others (2025-205747) [2025] ZAKZDHC 76 (24 November 2025)
[2025] ZAKZDHC 76High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)96% similar
David Lee Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Sargas (Pty) Ltd and Another (2025-142469) [2025] ZAKZDHC 57 (11 September 2025)
[2025] ZAKZDHC 57High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)96% similar
TBP Building and Civils (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Shamla Chetty t/a Nationwide Electrical and Others (D4774/2019) [2025] ZAKZDHC 46 (17 July 2025)
[2025] ZAKZDHC 46High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)96% similar
Member of the Executive Council for Health for the Province of KwaZulu-Natal v Dlamini and Others (D6815/19) [2023] ZAKZDHC 57 (15 August 2023)
[2023] ZAKZDHC 57High Court of South Africa (KwaZulu-Natal Division, Durban)96% similar

Discussion