Case Law[2023] NASC 5Namibia
Bank of Namibia v Elias and Another (SA 93/2020) [2023] NASC 5 (15 March 2023)
Supreme Court of Namibia
Judgment
# Bank of Namibia v Elias and Another (SA 93/2020) [2023] NASC 5 (15 March 2023)
[ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from NamibLII: Bank of Namibia v Elias and Another …&body=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15)
[ Download DOCX (52.0 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15/source) Toggle dropdown
* [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15/source.pdf)
Report a problem
__
* Share
* [ Download DOCX (52.0 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15/source)
* [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2023/5/eng@2023-03-15/source.pdf)
* * * *
* Report a problem
__
##### Bank of Namibia v Elias and Another (SA 93/2020) [2023] NASC 5 (15 March 2023)
Copy citation
* __Document detail
* __Related documents
Citation
Bank of Namibia v Elias and Another (SA 93/2020) [2023] NASC 5 (15 March 2023) Copy
Media Neutral Citation
[2023] NASC 5 Copy
Hearing date
8 March 2023
Court
[Supreme Court](/judgments/NASC/)
Case number
SA 93/2020
Judges
[Hoff JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Hoff%20JA), [Mainga JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Mainga%20JA), [Smuts JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Smuts%20JA)
Judgment date
15 March 2023
Language
English
* * *
Skip to document content
**NOT REPORTABLE**
CASE NO: SA 93/2020
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NAMIBIA**
In the matter between:
**BANK OF NAMIBIA** | **Appellant**
---|---
|
and |
|
**LESILIA ELIA** | **First Respondent**
**LABOUR COMMISSIONER** | **Second Respondent**
**Coram:** MAINGA JA, SMUTS JA and HOFF JA
**Heard: 8 March 2023**
**Delivered: 15 March 2023**
**Summary:** The appellant herein withdrew an appeal which was set down for 8 March 2023. First respondent seeks an order for costs against the appellant who has failed to file heads of argument when it was due, resulting in the lapsing of the appeal.
Appellant’s legal practitioner filed a notice of withdrawal in respect of the application for condonation and reinstatement which was initially filed, and tendered costs of the first respondent a day after the matter was heard.
_Held that,_ the application for condonation and reinstatement of the appeal is struck from the roll with costs.
____________________________________________________________________
**APPEAL JUDGMENT IN RESPECT OF COSTS**
____________________________________________________________________
HOFF JA (MAINGA JA and SMUTS JA concurring):
[1] This appeal was set down on 8 March 2023. The appellant’s legal practitioner failed to comply with rule 17(1) by neglecting to file heads of argument within the time stipulated in that rule. The result of such failure in terms of rule 17(2) is that the appeal lapses. This normally would require the appellant, in this matter, to launch an application for condonation for such non-compliance and for the reinstatement of the appeal.
[2] On 3 March 2023 the appellant’s legal practitioner filed a notice of withdrawal in respect of the application for condonation and reinstatement of the appeal. The matter was subsequently struck from the roll in court and the court reserved judgment in respect of the issue of costs.
[3] On 9 March 2023 a letter was filed by the appellant’s legal practitioner informing the presiding Justices that the appellant had tendered the costs of the first respondent and invited the first respondent to submit her bill of costs to the Registrar for the purpose of taxing thereof.
[4] In view of the tendering of costs by the appellant the following order is made:
The application for condonation and reinstatement of the appeal is struck from the roll with costs.
**__________________**
**HOFF JA**
**__________________**
**MAINGA JA**
**__________________**
**SMUTS JA**
APPEARANCES
APPELLANT: | N Tjombe
---|---
| Of Tjombe – Elago Inc.
|
|
FIRST RESPONDENT: | T Nanhapo
| Of Brockerhoff & Associates Legal Practitioners
|
#### __Related documents
▲ To the top
>
Similar Cases
Bank of Namibia and Another v NEMI Investments 104 CC and Others (SA 79/2024) [2025] NASC 3 (31 January 2025)
[2025] NASC 3Supreme Court of Namibia87% similar
First National Bank of Namibia Limited v Nghishidivali (SA 34 of 2019) [2021] NASC 50 (3 December 2021)
[2021] NASC 50Supreme Court of Namibia85% similar
Standard Bank Namibia Ltd v Nekwaya (SA 95 of 2020) [2022] NASC 43 (1 December 2022)
[2022] NASC 43Supreme Court of Namibia84% similar
Bank of Namibia v CBI Exchange Namibia (Pty) Ltd (SA 50 of 2022) [2022] NASC 46 (23 December 2022)
[2022] NASC 46Supreme Court of Namibia84% similar
Haitengela and Others v First National Bank of Namibia (SA 99/2023) [2023] NASC 41 (8 November 2023)
[2023] NASC 41Supreme Court of Namibia84% similar