Beukes v Kubitzausboerdery (Pty) Ltd (2) (Judgment in respect of costs) (SA 18 of 2019) [2020] NASC 24 (20 July 2020)

# Beukes v Kubitzausboerdery (Pty) Ltd (2) (Judgment in respect of costs) (SA 18 of 2019) [2020] NASC 24 (20 July 2020) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from NamibLII: Beukes v Kubitzausboerdery \(Pty\) Ltd \(2\) \(Judgment …&body=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20) [ Download DOCX (52.5 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20/source.pdf) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download DOCX (52.5 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20/source) * [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nasc/2020/24/eng@2020-07-20/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Beukes v Kubitzausboerdery (Pty) Ltd (2) (Judgment in respect of costs) (SA 18 of 2019) [2020] NASC 24 (20 July 2020) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Beukes v Kubitzausboerdery (Pty) Ltd (2) (Judgment in respect of costs) (SA 18 of 2019) [2020] NASC 24 (20 July 2020) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2020] NASC 24 Copy Court [Supreme Court](/judgments/NASC/) Case number SA 18 of 2019 Judges [Hoff JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Hoff%20JA), [Smuts JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Smuts%20JA), [Frank AJA](/judgments/all/?judges=Frank%20AJA) Judgment date 20 July 2020 Language English * * * Skip to document content **NOT REPORTABLE** CASE NO: SA 18/2019 **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NAMIBIA** In the matter between: **DAWID BEUKES** | **First Appellant** ---|--- **MARKUS NOABEB** | **Second Appellant** **ELFRIEDE GAROES** | **Third Appellant** **WILLEM HAAKSKEEN** | **Fourth Appellant** **MARIA TSUSES** | **Fifth Appellant** **PETRUS KASTOOR** | **Sixth Appellant** **JOHANNES WAMBO** | **Seventh Appellant** **MARKUS GAUSEB** | **Eight Appellant** **TIMOTHEUS GARISEB** | **Ninth Appellant** **SWARTBOOI TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY** | **Tenth Appellant** | and | | **KUBITZAUSBOERDERY (PTY) LTD** | **Respondent** **Coram:** SMUTS JA, HOFF JA and FRANK AJA **Heard: IN CHAMBERS** **Delivered: 20 July 2020** ____________________________________________________________________ **JUDGMENT IN RESPECT OF COSTS** ____________________________________________________________________ FRANK AJA (SMUTS JA and HOFF JA concurring): 1. In this matter the appeal was struck from the roll ‘with costs inclusive of the costs of one instructing and one instructed legal practitioner’. 2. The legal practitioner of the appellants in a letter to the registrar points out that the costs order was an error as appellants were legally aided litigants and that the respondent, for this reason, did not seek a costs order. The legal practitioner for the respondent had understandably not taken issue with the contents of this letter. 3. As the error relates to the costs order only and there can be no prejudice or injustice to anyone if the order contained in the judgment is altered so as to accord with the concession made on behalf of the respondent it will be so altered.1 4. In the result the order contained in paragraph 39 of the judgment of 1 July 2020 is altered to read as follows: ‘The appeal is struck from the roll.’ **__________________** **FRANK AJA** **__________________** **SMUTS JA** **__________________** **HOFF JA** APPEARANCES APPELLANTS: | R Mondo ---|--- | Of Nixon Marcus Public Law Office, Windhoek | | RESPONDENT: | J Diedericks | Instructed by Conradie & Damaseb Legal Practitioners, Windhoek 1 _Standard Bank v Jacobsen’s Trustee_ (1899) 16 SC 352, _Estate Garlick v Commissioner for the Inland Revenue_ 1934 AD 499, _West Rand Estate Ltd v New Zealand Insurance Co. Ltd_ 1926 AD 173 at 194 and _Zondi v MEC, Traditional and Local Government Affairs_ & others 2006 (3) SA 1 (CC) paras 34, 35 and 46. #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >