Maio v Public Service Pensions Fund (46/22) [2024] SZSC 9 (11 April 2024)

# Maio v Public Service Pensions Fund (46/22) [2024] SZSC 9 (11 April 2024) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Maio v Public Service Pensions Fund \(46/22\) …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11) [ Download PDF (952.3 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (952.3 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/9/eng@2024-04-11/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Maio v Public Service Pensions Fund (46/22) [2024] SZSC 9 (11 April 2024) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Maio v Public Service Pensions Fund (46/22) [2024] SZSC 9 (11 April 2024) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2024] SZSC 9 Copy Hearing date 22 November 2023 Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 46/22 Judges [Dlamini JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Dlamini%20JA), [S.J.K. MATSEBULA JA](/judgments/all/?judges=S.J.K.%20MATSEBULA%20JA), [MD Mamba JA](/judgments/all/?judges=MD%20Mamba%20JA) Judgment date 11 April 2024 Language English * * * Skip to document content : Law of Contract - Appellant employed by Eswatini Gm,ernment - Appellant a member of the Public Service Pensions Fund established by the Eswatini Government- Government accused Appellant of theft \- DPP did not prosecute because of lack of evidence - Government, through the Civil Service Commission held disciplinary proceedings and found Appellant guilty and dismissed him - Appellant sued Government for unfair dismissal - Before the Industrial Court could pronounce on the dismissal, Government settled the dispute out of court- Government on the other hand had instructed the Public Service Pensions Fund that Appellant had been dismissed and therefore not entitled to Government's contributions - Deed of Settlement examined - Regulation 13 of the Public Service Pensions Fund examined-section 3 and 4 of the Public Service Pensions Order also examined. #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >