Maziya Vs Maziya and others (31/2023) [2024] SZSC 2 (21 March 2024)

# Maziya Vs Maziya and others (31/2023) [2024] SZSC 2 (21 March 2024) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Maziya Vs Maziya and others \(31/2023\) \[2024\] …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21) [ Download PDF (679.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (679.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2024/2/eng@2024-03-21/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Maziya Vs Maziya and others (31/2023) [2024] SZSC 2 (21 March 2024) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Maziya Vs Maziya and others (31/2023) [2024] SZSC 2 (21 March 2024) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2024] SZSC 2 Copy Hearing date 24 November 2023 Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 31/2023 Judges [Dlamini JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Dlamini%20JA), [Maphalala JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Maphalala%20JA), [Hlophe JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Hlophe%20JA) Judgment date 21 March 2024 Language English * * * Skip to document content _Civil Appeal_ \- _Appellant appealed a decision of the High Court.in which it decided that an agreement of sale of property between the Appellant and his father -which culminated in the transfer of the said property's tittle fi"om the latter to Appellant was not a sale but a disguised transaction (simulated transaction)_ \- _The issue is,whether the Court a quo correctly decided the matter as well as whether the orders issued by the said Court are valid._ #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >