Sonto and Another v Zwane and Others (95 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 19 (29 June 2023)

# Sonto and Another v Zwane and Others (95 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 19 (29 June 2023) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Sonto and Another v Zwane and Others …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29) [ Download PDF (895.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (895.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/19/eng@2023-06-29/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Sonto and Another v Zwane and Others (95 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 19 (29 June 2023) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Sonto and Another v Zwane and Others (95 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 19 (29 June 2023) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2023] SZSC 19 Copy Hearing date 5 April 2023 Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 95 of 2022 Judges [Dlamini J](/judgments/all/?judges=Dlamini%20J), [Manzini AJ](/judgments/all/?judges=Manzini%20AJ), [Dlamini JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Dlamini%20JA) Judgment date 29 June 2023 Language English * * * Skip to document content Civil procedure - Appeal against High Court Order directing ejectment of Appellants from property purchased by 3rd Respondent at a sale in execution - Appellants contending that High Court erred in refusing to determine Application to set aside sale in execution on the basis that it was not a valid defence to eviction proceedings - Appellants contending that sale was invalid for non­ compliance with Rule46(8)(a) and therefore could not serve to pass ownership to 3rd Respondent- Principle that property may be vindicated from bona fide purchaser where sale in execution was invalid discussed - Test for determining whether sale in execution complies with High Court Rules discussed - Alleged grounds of invalidity discussed. #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >