Clerk of Parliament v Dlamini (13) [2023] SZSC 16 (29 May 2023)

# Clerk of Parliament v Dlamini (13) [2023] SZSC 16 (29 May 2023) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Clerk of Parliament v Dlamini \(13\) \[2023\] …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29) [ Download PDF (341.8 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (341.8 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/16/eng@2023-05-29/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Clerk of Parliament v Dlamini (13) [2023] SZSC 16 (29 May 2023) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents * __Citations \- / 1 Citation Clerk of Parliament v Dlamini (13) [2023] SZSC 16 (29 May 2023) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2023] SZSC 16 Copy Hearing date 27 April 2023 Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 13 Judges [Annadale JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Annadale%20JA), [Van der Walt JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Van%20der%20Walt%20JA), [Fakudze J](/judgments/all/?judges=Fakudze%20J), [Maphalala JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Maphalala%20JA), [Currie AJA](/judgments/all/?judges=Currie%20AJA) Judgment date 29 May 2023 Language English * * * Skip to document content Review in terms of Section 148 (2) of the Constitution - Applicant seeks to review a judgment of Supreme Court - Review based on two ground (a) that the Court committed an error in concluding that the Re,1pondent qualified as a Senator in terms of Section 96 (c) of the Constitution; (b) that the court committed an error in declaring that the Respondent is not a Returning Offer in terms of the Constitution - On the day matter was heard, Applicant withdrew ground (a) -- Since Supreme Court made its finding in terms of ground (a), there is nothing to review because ground (b) of the review application was obiter -Application for review dismissed with costs _._ #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >