Dupont and Another v Wafa Wafa Investments (Pty) Ltd (60 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 20 (24 May 2023)

# Dupont and Another v Wafa Wafa Investments (Pty) Ltd (60 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 20 (24 May 2023) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Dupont and Another v Wafa Wafa Investments …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24) [ Download PDF (223.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (223.0 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2023/20/eng@2023-05-24/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Dupont and Another v Wafa Wafa Investments (Pty) Ltd (60 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 20 (24 May 2023) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Dupont and Another v Wafa Wafa Investments (Pty) Ltd (60 of 2022) [2023] SZSC 20 (24 May 2023) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2023] SZSC 20 Copy Hearing date 24 May 2023 Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 60 of 2022 Judges [Manzini AJA](/judgments/all/?judges=Manzini%20AJA), [Van der Walt JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Van%20der%20Walt%20JA), [Mamba J](/judgments/all/?judges=Mamba%20J) Judgment date 24 May 2023 Language English * * * Skip to document content Civil law -Appeal against High Court Order declaring a lease agreement (]'' lease agreement) concluded by the parties to be valid and that lessee is entitled to occupation of the premises despite premises being occupied by third party - High Court issuing declaratory order notwithstanding that business premises being are occupied by a third party whose particulars were fully disclosed to the other side and to the court, but who was not cited in the proceedings - third party alleged to be in occupation of business premises in terms of a lease agreement (2nd lease agreement) concluded with Appellant. #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >