africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2016] SZSC 19Eswatini

Davidson Distributors v Swaziland Competition Commission (77 of 2015) [2016] SZSC 19 (30 June 2016)

Supreme Court of eSwatini

Judgment

# Davidson Distributors v Swaziland Competition Commission (77 of 2015) [2016] SZSC 19 (30 June 2016) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Davidson Distributors v Swaziland Competition Commission \(77 …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30) [ Download DOC (44.8 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30/source.pdf) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download DOC (44.8 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30/source) * [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Davidson Distributors v Swaziland Competition Commission (77 of 2015) [2016] SZSC 19 (30 June 2016) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Davidson Distributors v Swaziland Competition Commission (77 of 2015) [2016] SZSC 19 (30 June 2016) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2016] SZSC 19 Copy Court [Supreme Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZSC/) Case number 77 of 2015 Judges [Dlamini JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Dlamini%20JA), [Odoki JA](/judgments/all/?judges=Odoki%20JA), [Maphanga AJA](/judgments/all/?judges=Maphanga%20AJA) Judgment date 30 June 2016 Language English Court Roll [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szsc/2016/19/eng@2016-06-30/attachment/davidson-distributors-v-swaziland-competition-commission-2016-szsc-19-30-june-2016.pdf) (158.4 KB) * * * Skip to document content **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SWAZILAND** _**JUDGMENT**_ HELD AT MBABANE Civil Case No. 77/2015 In the matter between: **DAVIDSON DISTRIBUTORS** Applicant And **SWAZILAND COMPETION COMMISSION** Respondent **Neutral citation:** Davidson Distributors _vs. Swaziland Competition Commission (77/2015) [2016] SZSC 19 (30 June 2016)_ **Coram: DR. B.J. ODOKI, JA** **S.P. DLAMINI, JA** **C. MAPHANGA, AJA** **Heard:** 19 May 2016 **Delivered:** 30 June 2016 **Summary** : _Civil Appeal – Consent order – amendment of the judgment of the court a quo – Judgment of the court a quo upheld and new paragraph added – cost awarded to the respondent at the normal scale._ **JUDGMENT** _**S. P. DLAMINI, JA**_ [1] This is an appeal that arose from a judgment of the Magistrate Court granting Summary Judgment in favour of the appellant herein. [2] Having not been satisfied with the Summary Judgment, the respondent herein filed an appeal at the court __a__ __quo__. The appeal was upheld with costs. The appellant then filed an appeal against the judgment of the court __a__ __quo__. [3] At the hearing of the matter on the 19th May 2016 Counsel for both the appellant and respondent consented that the matter be referred back to the Magistrate Court for hearing and that respondent be awarded costs at the normal scale. **ORDER** [4] Consequently, the orders of this court are that by consent; 1. The judgment of the court __a__ __quo__ is upheld; 2. At the end of the judgment of court __a__ __quo__ , the following sentence is inserted _**“the matter be and is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Court for hearing”;**_ and 3. Respondent is awarded costs at the normal scale. ________________ **S.P. DLAMINI** **JUSTICE OF APPEAL** I agree ______________ **DR. B.J. ODOKI** **JUSTICE OF APPEAL** I agree _______________ **C. MAPHANGA** **ACTING JUSTICE OF APPEAL** FOR THE APPELLANT: **K. Q. MAGAGULA** FOR THE RESPONDENT: **N.S. MANZINI** 4 #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >

Similar Cases

Siyembili Motors Swaziland (Pty) Ltd v Swaziland Competition Commission (73 of 2019) [2020] SZSC 18 (10 June 2020)
[2020] SZSC 18Supreme Court of eSwatini81% similar
Swaziland Competition Commission v Swazi Mtn Ltd (31 of 2019) [2020] SZSC 101 (12 March 2020)
[2020] SZSC 101Supreme Court of eSwatini80% similar
Msweli v Ok Bazaars Swaziland (Pty) Ltd (5 of 2017) [2021] SZIC 85 (24 November 2021)
[2021] SZIC 85Industrial Court of eSwatini76% similar
Davinscot Clothing Swaziland (Pty) Ltd v Eswatini Investement Promotion Authority and others (2511 of 2024) [2025] SZHC 423 (16 September 2025)
[2025] SZHC 423High Court of eSwatini76% similar
Swaziland Auctioners (Pty) Ltd And Others v The Swaziland Development And Savings Bank (1 of 2017) [2019] SZSC 15 (31 May 2019)
[2019] SZSC 15Supreme Court of eSwatini75% similar

Discussion