africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2011] NALC 7Namibia

Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Nantinda (1) (75 of 2009) [2011] NALC 7 (4 March 2011)

Labour Court of Namibia

Judgment

# Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Nantinda (1) (75 of 2009) [2011] NALC 7 (4 March 2011) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from NamibLII: Namibia Power Corporation \(Pty\) Ltd v Nantinda …&body=https://namiblii.org/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04) [ Download RTF (12.6 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04/source.pdf) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download RTF (12.6 KB) ](/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04/source) * [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Nantinda (1) (75 of 2009) [2011] NALC 7 (4 March 2011) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Nantinda (1) (75 of 2009) [2011] NALC 7 (4 March 2011) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2011] NALC 7 Copy Court [Labour Court](/judgments/NALC/) Case number 75 of 2009 Judgment date 4 March 2011 Language English Other documents [Download PDF](/akn/na/judgment/nalc/2011/7/eng@2011-03-04/attachment/namibia-power-corporation-pty-ltd-v-nantinda-1-2011-nalc-7-4-march-2011.pdf) (136.7 KB) * * * Skip to document content _**NOT**_ __**REPORTABLE**__**CASE NO.: LCA 75/2009** **IN THE LABOUR COURT OF NAMIBIA** In the matter between: **NAMIBIA POWER CORPORATION (PTY) LTD** **Appellant** and **GERALD NANTINDA** **Respondent** _**CORAM:**_ **GEIER AJ** Heard on: 2011 March 04 Delivered on: 2011 March 04 **RULING (Ex** _**Tempore)**_ _**GEIER AJ**_**:**[1] In the circumstances of this matter, it is clear, or the parties are in agreement that the Appeal has lapsed and that it should therefore be removed from the roll. [2] The only issue before the Court this morning is the question of costs. In terms of the Labour Act, a costs order can only be made if a party is found to be frivolous and vexatious. [3] In the present circumstances, it would appear that this matter was set down for hearing in September last year. Appellant thereafter duly filed Heads of Argument on the 17th of February, to which the Respondent then filed its heads on the 25th of February. That was shortly before the date of set down which was the 4th of March 2011. In the Respondent's Heads of Argument, the crisp point was taken that the appeal had lapsed for failure of having prosecuted it within the required time. [4] There is nothing before me that indicates that Appellant was aware before that time that this appeal had lapsed and that the further prosecution thereof or the purported prosecution thereof, was therefore done in a frivolous or vexatious manner. [5] Furthermore, Mr Dicks refers me to Rule 17(16)(b) of the Rules of the Labour Court, in terms of which it would have become incumbent on the respondent to have disclosed the reasons for opposing the appeal in terms of the Rule. This was not done. Because this avenue was not utilized the fact that the appeal had lapsed, was not drawn to the Appellant's attention much earlier. [6] In the circumstances and on the information available and evidence before this Court, a case for a costs order has not been made out and I accordingly decline to make such Order. [7] The matter is hereby removed from the roll. **GEIER AJ** **COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT:** Adv. G Dicks Instructed by: Fisher, Quarmby & Pfeiffer **COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT:** Mr E E Coetzee Instructed by: Tjitemisa & Associates #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >

Similar Cases

Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Nantinda (2) (LC 38 of 2008) [2012] NALC 6 (22 March 2012)
[2012] NALC 6Labour Court of Namibia97% similar
Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Kaapehi and Others (2) (SA 41 of 2019) [2020] NASC 60 (29 October 2020)
[2020] NASC 60Supreme Court of Namibia88% similar
Namibia Power Corporation (Pty) Ltd v Kaapehi (SA 41 of 2019) [2020] NASC 37 (29 October 2020)
[2020] NASC 37Supreme Court of Namibia88% similar
Namibia Development Corporation v Mwandingi and Others (LCA 87 of 2009) [2012] NALC 41 (3 December 2012)
[2012] NALC 41Labour Court of Namibia84% similar
Telecom Namibia Limited v Nangolo and Others (LCA 18 of 2009) [2012] NALC 37 (5 November 2012)
[2012] NALC 37Labour Court of Namibia83% similar

Discussion