Msweli v Waterford kaMhlaba United World College of Southern Africa Case No (358/2023) [2024] SZIC 7 (20 February 2024)

# Msweli v Waterford kaMhlaba United World College of Southern Africa Case No (358/2023) [2024] SZIC 7 (20 February 2024) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Msweli v Waterford kaMhlaba United World College …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20) [ Download PDF (371.4 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20/source) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (371.4 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2024/7/eng@2024-02-20/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Msweli v Waterford kaMhlaba United World College of Southern Africa Case No (358/2023) [2024] SZIC 7 (20 February 2024) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Msweli v Waterford kaMhlaba United World College of Southern Africa Case No (358/2023) [2024] SZIC 7 (20 February 2024) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2024] SZIC 7 Copy Hearing date 20 December 2023 Court [Industrial Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZIC/) Case number 358/2023 Judges [Msimango J](/judgments/all/?judges=Msimango%20J) Judgment date 20 February 2024 Language English * * * Skip to document content The Applicant brought an application to court to declare and/or interdict the non-renewal of her fixed term contract by the Respondent as unlawful and without due process of the law. The Applicant argued that she has been an employee of the Respondent for the past seven years, wherein he was employed on fixed term contracts which have all been renewed at the end of their term, once a performance improvement plan was conducted between the Applicant and the Respondent. However, the Respondent has failed and/or neglected conducting a performance improvement plan for purposes of determining the renewal of the contract. The Applicant submitted that by law, the Respondent is debarred from terminating the contract without undertaking this process which is a vital requirement in making such a decision #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >