africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2020] SZIC 14Eswatini

Dlamini v Van Niekerk Produce (316 of 2018) [2020] SZIC 14 (11 February 2020)

Industrial Court of eSwatini

Judgment

# Dlamini v Van Niekerk Produce (316 of 2018) [2020] SZIC 14 (11 February 2020) [ __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11) [ __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11) [ __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11) [ __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11) [ __](mailto:?subject=Take a look at this document from EswatiniLII: Dlamini v Van Niekerk Produce \(316 of …&body=https://eswatinilii.org/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11) [ Download DOC (468.5 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11/source.pdf) Report a problem __ * Share * [ Download DOC (468.5 KB) ](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11/source) * [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Dlamini v Van Niekerk Produce (316 of 2018) [2020] SZIC 14 (11 February 2020) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Dlamini v Van Niekerk Produce (316 of 2018) [2020] SZIC 14 (11 February 2020) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2020] SZIC 14 Copy Court [Industrial Court of eSwatini](/judgments/SZIC/) Case number 316 of 2018 Judges [Nsibande JP](/judgments/all/?judges=Nsibande%20JP) Judgment date 11 February 2020 Language English Court Roll [Download PDF](/akn/sz/judgment/szic/2020/14/eng@2020-02-11/attachment/dlamini-v-van-niekerk-produce-2020-szic-14-11-february-2020.pdf) (208.2 KB) * * * Skip to document content _**IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF ESWATINI**_ **RULING** Case No. 316/18 In the matter between: **FIGA VUSUMUZI DLAMINI** Applicant **And** **VAN NIEKERK PRODUCE** Respondent **Neutral citation:** Figa Vusumuzi Dlamini V Van Niekerk Produce _(316/2018)_[2020]_SZIC 14_(11 February 2020) **Coram: S. NSIBANDE JP** (Sitting with Nominated Members of the Court Mr N. Manana and Mr M. Dlamini) **Heard:** 30 July 2019 **Delivered:** 11 February 2020 _**RULING**_ [1] In his application for the determination of an unresolved dispute, the Applicant avers that he was dismissed by the Respondent on 6th February 2017 and that the dismissal was unfair substantively and procedurally. He claims reinstatement alternatively payment of E25 160.00 in respect of terminal benefits and compensation for unfair dismissal. [2] The Respondent opposed the application and in its Reply denies that Applicant was dismissed at all. It avers that the Applicant, having been hired on a 5 month contract ending on 1st March 2017, abandoned his employ on 6th February 2017 on his own accord. [3] The Applicant has now applied to the President for the referral of the unresolved dispute to the Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration Commission (CMAC) for arbitration. The Respondent has not filed any opposing papers and has not appeared in Court on both occasions that the matter was called despite being properly served with the necessary documents. [4] The Applicant seeks that the matter be referred to CMAC because the dispute is not complex nor does it involved any complex issues of law. The Applicant further complains that this Honorable Court has a backlog of cases which may result in his matter taking a number of years before being tried. [5] A consideration of the pleadings and the Applicant’s submissions leave me with no doubt that this is a matter more suited to the less formal procedures of CMAC. In my view, there are no complex factual or legal issues that may arise from this matter that may require that it not be referred to arbitration. The amount sought it also not substantial even for an undertaking such as the Respondent. [6] Further, the improved qualifications of CMAC arbitrators will off-set any prejudice the Respondent may suffer from the referral to CMAC arbitration. In the circumstances I order that; 1. **The unresolved dispute between the parties is hereby referred to CMAC for arbitration;** 2. **Each party is to pay its own costs.** **** **For the Applicant:** Mr. M.R. Ndlangamandla **For the Respondent:** No appearance 4 #### __Related documents ▲ To the top >

Similar Cases

Dlamini v Dlamini (9 of 2020) [2020] SZSC 41 (24 November 2020)
[2020] SZSC 41Supreme Court of eSwatini89% similar
Dlamini v Mp Food Processors (256 of 2015) [2019] SZIC 16 (22 February 2019)
[2019] SZIC 16Industrial Court of eSwatini89% similar
Dlamini v Dlamini (70 of 2019) [2023] SZSC 3 (14 February 2023)
[2023] SZSC 3Supreme Court of eSwatini88% similar
Dlamini v Lukhele (88/2016) [2024] SZSC 93 (18 September 2024)
[2024] SZSC 93Supreme Court of eSwatini88% similar
Dlamini v Dlamini (6 of 2019) [2021] SZSC 50 (4 June 2021)
[2021] SZSC 50Supreme Court of eSwatini88% similar

Discussion