Case Law[2026] KESC 9Kenya
Akinyi v Ogwari & another (Petition (Application) E025 of 2025) [2026] KESC 9 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Ruling)
Supreme Court of Kenya
Judgment
Akinyi v Ogwari & another (Petition (Application) E025 of 2025) [2026] KESC 9 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2026] KESC 9 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Supreme Court of Kenya
Petition (Application) E025 of 2025
MK Koome, CJ & P, PM Mwilu, DCJ & VP, SC Wanjala, N Ndungu & I Lenaola, SCJJ
January 23, 2026
Between
Linet Akinyi
Applicant
and
Jerusha Auma Ogwari
1st Respondent
Ibrahim Aisha Hers
2nd Respondent
(Being an application seeking review of the decision of the Deputy Registrar delivered on 23rd May, 2025, declining to admit the Applicant’s Petition of Appeal filed against the Ruling of Magare, J. delivered on 9th May 2025 [Civil Appeal E223 of 2022](https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2024/4965/eng@2024-05-09) )
Ruling
Representation:Mr. Joseph N. Musomba f0r the Applicant(Kulecho, Musumba & Co. Advocates)No appearance for the Respondents
1.UPON perusing of the applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 19th May 2025 and filed before this Court on 28th May 2025 under Rule 6(2) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020 seeking orders inter alia –a.Spent;b.This Court be pleased to review the decision of the Deputy Registrar made on 23rd May 2025 declining the lodging of her Petition of Appeal to this Court and allow the Petition of Appeal to be lodged; andc.The cost of the Application be in the cause; and
2.Upon Considering the grounds on the face of the application and the supporting affidavit sworn by Joseph N. Musomba, the learned counsel for the applicant, dated 26th May 2025 and filed on 28th May 2025 wherein the applicant contends that on 3rd July 2023 she was injured in a road traffic accident and as a result she filed a claim at the Small Claims Court on 2nd November 2023 being Milimani SCC/E969/2024; Linet Akinyi Vs James K Ng’ang’a.; which was heard by Hon. P Makokha, Small Claims Court Adjudicator and on 4th March 2024, dismissed the suit on grounds that the court was deprived of jurisdiction to hear and determine matters under CAP 405, as had been held by Magare J. in a Judgment delivered on 3rd July, 2023 in Mombasa HCCA/223/2022 Jerusha Ouma Ogwari Vs Ibrahim Aisha Hersi Alias Aisha Hersi Ibrahim. Aggrieved by the decision of the Adjudicator, the applicant filed an application dated 11th May 2024 before the Mombasa High Court seeking clarity as to whether the said court had indeed ousted the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court to hear and determine matters under CAP 405 following its decision in Mombasa HCCA/223/2022. The High Court (Magare, J.) consolidated the application with an application for review that had been filed by the parties in Mombasa HCCA/223/2022 and delivered a ruling on 9th May 2024 declining to review his judgment. Aggrieved by the decision of the High Court, the applicant on 21st May, 2025 filed a Petition of Appeal dated 19th May, 2025 before this Court online. However, upon presenting physical copies of her Petition of Appeal together with the Record of Appeal, the Deputy Registrar of this Court declined to admit her appeal vide his decision delivered on 23rd May 2025 for reasons that the applicant had failed to attach to her record of appeal and a copy of a judgment or a ruling of the Court of Appeal as required under Rule 40(1)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules; and
3.Further Considering that the applicant argues that her appeal falls under Article 163(3)(b)(ii) of [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) which grants this Court jurisdiction to hear appeals from any court or tribunal as prescribed by a national legislation. She also argues that since Rule 40 (1)(b) partly reads “for purpose of instituting an appeal from the Court of Appeal decision” the same does not apply to her appeal which is against a decision of the High Court under Article163(3)(b)(ii) of [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution). She asserts that she filed her appeal before this Court because Section 38 of the [Small Claims Court Act](/akn/ke/act/2016/2), expressly ousts the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to hear and determine appeals from the decisions of the High Court. She further asserts that Article 163(3)(b)(ii) does not require certification whatsoever. She urges that if the decision of the Deputy Registrar is allowed to stand, it would mean that all appeals filed under Article 163(3)(b)(ii) are inadmissible in this Court since they do not emanate from the Court of Appeal; and
4.Bearing In Mind that the primary issue before us is whether this Court has jurisdiction under Article 163(3)(b)(ii) as read together with Section 38 of the Small Claims Act to hear and determine an appeal from the High Court;
5.We Now Opine And Determine as follows:i.It is trite law that a court’s jurisdiction flows from either [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) or legislation or both. In the Matter of the Interim Independent Electoral Commission (Applicant), Constitutional Application Number 2 of 2011, this Court dealt with the question of jurisdiction extensively. The Court observed that where [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) exhaustively provides for the jurisdiction of a court of law, the court must operate within the constitutional limits. It cannot expand its jurisdiction through judicial craft or innovation.ii.Article 163(3)(b)(ii) of [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) provides as follows:“3)The Supreme Court shall have—(a)………………(b)subject to clause (4) and (5), appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from—i.the Court of Appeal; andii.any other court or tribunal as prescribed by national legislation.”iii.Section 38 of the [Small Claims Court Act](/akn/ke/act/2016/2) on the other hand provides as follows:“38.Appeals1.A person aggrieved by the decision or an order of the Court may appeal against that decision or order to the High Court on matters of law.2.An appeal from any decision or order referred to in subsection (1) shall be final.”iv.The applicant argues that since Section 38 of the [Small Claims Court Act](/akn/ke/act/2016/2) ousts the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to hear and the determine appeals against the decisions of the High Court, Article 163(3)(b)(ii) of [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) which grants this Court jurisdiction to hear Appeals from any court or tribunal comes to her aid. However, we note that the applicant in her argument has failed to address the rider under Article 163(3)(b)(ii) of [the Constitution](/akn/ke/act/2010/constitution) that such appellate jurisdiction must have been prescribed by a national legislation. Outrightly, the [Small Claims Court Act](/akn/ke/act/2016/2), which is the national legislation that governs all matters arising from the Small Claims Court, does not prescribe appellate jurisdiction to this Court as required under Article 163(3)(b)(ii) but instead provides that the High Court shall be the final appellate court. Therefore, from the foregoing, this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the applicant’s appeal. For the said reason, we find no merit in this application and accordingly dismiss it.v.Given that the respondents did not participate in these proceedings, it is appropriate that each party bears its own costs.
6.Consequently and for the reasons aforestated, we make the following Orders:i.The applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 19th May 2025 and filed on 28th May 2025 be and is hereby dismissed.ii.There shall be no order as to costs.It is so ordered.
**DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 23 RD DAY OF JANUARY 2026.****........................................****M.K. KOOME****CHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA****........................................****P.M MWILU****DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE & VICE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA****........................................****S.C. WANJALA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****........................................****NJOKI NDUNGU****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****........................................****I. LENAOLA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** I certify that this is a true copy of the original**REGISTRAR****SUPREME COURT OF KENYA**
Similar Cases
Kagina v Kagina & 2 others (Application E002 of 2023) [2023] KESC 54 (KLR) (16 June 2023) (Ruling)
[2023] KESC 54Supreme Court of Kenya83% similar
Wandi v Muchira (Petition (Application) E029 of 2024) [2025] KESC 40 (KLR) (9 June 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KESC 40Supreme Court of Kenya83% similar
Kiptui v Kiptiony (Petition E025 & E026 of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2025] KESC 30 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Judgment)
[2025] KESC 30Supreme Court of Kenya83% similar
Amollo v Wilson (Application E014 of 2023) [2023] KESC 77 (KLR) (Civ) (22 September 2023) (Ruling)
[2023] KESC 77Supreme Court of Kenya82% similar
Wafula v Maru (Application E012 of 2025) [2026] KESC 8 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KESC 8Supreme Court of Kenya82% similar