africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2024] KESC 9Kenya

Sehmi & another v Tarabana Company Limited & 5 others; Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates (Applicant) (Petition (Application) E033 of 2023) [2024] KESC 9 (KLR) (12 April 2024) (Ruling)

Supreme Court of Kenya

Judgment

Sehmi & another v Tarabana Company Limited & 5 others; Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates (Applicant) (Petition (Application) E033 of 2023) [2024] KESC 9 (KLR) (12 April 2024) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2024] KESC 9 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the Supreme Court of Kenya Petition (Application) E033 of 2023 SC Wanjala, J April 12, 2024 Between Harcharan Singh Sehmi 1st Appellant Jaswarana Sehmi 2nd Appellant and Tarabana Company Limited 1st Respondent Rospatech Limited 2nd Respondent Chief Land Registrar, Nairobi 3rd Respondent Inspector General of Police 4th Respondent Land Commission 5th Respondent The Attorney General 6th Respondent and Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates Applicant ((Being an application by M/s Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates to cease acting for the 2nd respondent) Ruling **Representation:** Mr. Shama h/b for Mr. George Mbugua Ng’ang’a for the applicant (Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates)Mr. Mumo h/b for Mr. David Njoroge for the 1st and 2nd appellants (Igeria & Ngugi Advocates)Mr. Khayega Chivai for the 1st respondent (Kipkorir Cheruiyot Chivai & Kigen Advocates)Mr. Allan Kamau for the 3rd, 5th and 6th respondents (State Counsel Office of the Attorney General) 1.Uponperusing the Motion dated 31st January 2024 and lodged on 8th February 2024 brought pursuant to Rule 18 (6) and (7) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2020 seeking the following orders, that: the firm of Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Company Advocates (hereinafter, ‘the firm’) be granted leave to cease from acting for Rospatech Limited; and costs of this application be provided; and 2.Uponreading the affidavit in support of the Motion sworn by George Ng’ang’a Mbugua, Advocate on 31st January 2024, wherein, he depones that his client, the 2nd respondent herein, has ceased contact and that despite several reminders, has failed to give him proper instructions and is therefore unable to proceed with the Petition; and 3.Uponconsidering the applicant’s written submissions dated 7th February 2024, and filed on 8th February 2024, as well as the Affidavit of Service sworn on 13th February 2024, in which Counsel submits that the 2nd respondent was served with the present application and its attendant directions electronically on 12th February 2024, through its Director Martin Njuguna on WhatsApp via his last known telephone number and email address, pursuant to Section 16 of the Supreme Court Rules 2020; and 4.Bearing in mindthat the application was served upon all other parties and is uncontested, and further considering that Section 23(2)(g) of the [Supreme Court Act](/akn/ke/act/2011/7), 2011 grants a single Judge jurisdiction to determine the application in the following terms:23.Exercise of powers of the Court(2)A single judge may hear and determine an application for the following preliminary procedures—(g)withdrawal of an advocate to cease acting for a party; 5.I opinethat, a court of law cannot compel counsel to continue acting for a party, who has lost touch or interest in the matter for whatever reason. 6.Accordingly, I now make the following Orders:a.The Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2024, and lodged on 8th February 2024, is hereby allowed.b.Consequently, the Firm of M/s Mbugua Ng’ang’a & Co. Advocates, is hereby granted leave to cease acting for the 2nd respondent;c.The costs of this application shall be borne by the 2nd respondent.It is so Ordered. **DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 12 TH DAY OF APRIL 2024.****.............................****S. C. WANJALA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** I certify that this is a true copy of the original**REGISTRAR,****SUPREME COURT OF KENYA**

Similar Cases

Sehmi & another v Tarabana Company Limited & 5 others; Law Society of Kenya (Proposed Interested Party) (Petition (Application) E033 of 2023) [2024] KESC 13 (KLR) (12 April 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KESC 13Supreme Court of Kenya95% similar
Sehmi & another v Tarabana Company Limited & 5 others (Petition E033 of 2023) [2025] KESC 21 (KLR) (11 April 2025) (Judgment)
[2025] KESC 21Supreme Court of Kenya95% similar
Mwambora & 9 others v Spire Properties (K) Limited & 50 others (Petition (Application) 27 (E031) of 2022) [2023] KESC 12 (KLR) (Civ) (17 February 2023) (Ruling)
[2023] KESC 12Supreme Court of Kenya81% similar
Dari Ltd & 5 others v East African Development Bank (Petition (Application) E012 of 2023) [2024] KESC 58 (KLR) (Civ) (11 October 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KESC 58Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar
Kithangari & 4 others v Mutahi (Application E024 of 2024) [2024] KESC 72 (KLR) (29 November 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KESC 72Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar

Discussion