Case Law[2022] KESC 49Kenya
Khalifa & 3 others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 3 others (Presidential Election Petition E003 of 2022) [2022] KESC 49 (KLR) (Election Petitions) (30 August 2022) (Ruling)
Supreme Court of Kenya
Judgment
Khalifa & 3 others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 3 others (Presidential Election Petition E003 of 2022) [2022] KESC 49 (KLR) (Election Petitions) (30 August 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KESC 49 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Supreme Court of Kenya
Election Petitions
Presidential Election Petition E003 of 2022
MK Koome, CJ & P, PM Mwilu, DCJ & VP, MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala, N Ndungu, I Lenaola & W Ouko, SCJJ
August 30, 2022
Between
Khelef Khalifa
1st Petitioner
Grace Kamau
2nd Petitioner
Ruth Mumbi
3rd Petitioner
Grace Kamau
4th Petitioner
and
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
1st Respondent
Chairperson of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
2nd Respondent
William Ruto
3rd Respondent
Attorney General
4th Respondent
(Being an application by the 3rd respondent to strike out the name of the Attorney General in Petition E003 of 2022.)
Supreme Court dismisses application filed out of time.
Reported by John Ribia
**_Electoral Law_** _– presidential election petition – applications – applications filed out of time – whether in determining applications in the presidential election petition, the Supreme Court could determine an application filed out of time – Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017, rule 17._
Brief facts The 3rd respondent filed the application in which he sought leave to strike out the name of the Attorney General in petition No. E003 of 2022 on grounds of misjoinder, outside the prescribed time limits.
Issues Whether in determining applications in the presidential election petition, the Supreme Court could determine an application filed out of time.
Held The application was filed out of time. It was incompetent and an abuse of court process. In any event, the court had determined the issue in the said application in its ruling delivered on the August 29, 2022 in Petition E002 of 2022.
_Application dismissed._
Citations **Cases** None referred to**Statutes**** _Kenya_** Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017 (cap 9B Sub Leg) rule 17 - (Interpreted)AdvocatesNone mentioned
Ruling
1.This application is dated the August 27, 2022 and filed on the August 29, 2022 by William Samoei Ruto, (the 3rd respondent). He seeks leave to strike out the name of the Attorney General in Petition No E003 of 2022 on grounds of misjoinder. It is supported by the affidavit of William Samoei Ruto, sworn on the 27th August, 2022 and filed on the August 29, 2022. It is brought pursuant to rule 17 of the [Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017](http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/sublegview.xql?subleg=No.%207%20of%202011).
2.We have considered the application, affidavit in support, as well as the petitioners’ replying affidavit and submissions in opposition thereto. We find that the application, which was filed on the August 29, 2022 at 4:45 pm was filed out of time, is therefore incompetent and an abuse of the court process. In any event, the court has determined the issue in the said application in its ruling delivered on the August 29, 2022 in Petition E002 of 2022.
3.Consequently, the application is hereby dismissed with no orders as to costs.
**DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022**.**.................................****M. K. KOOME****CHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****P. M. MWILU****DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE & VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****M. K. IBRAHIM****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****S. C. WANJALA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****NJOKI NDUNGU****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****I. LENAOLA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****.................................****W. OUKO****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** I certify that this is a true copy of the original**REGISTRAR,****SUPREME COURT OF KENYA**
Similar Cases
Odinga & 4 others v Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission & 7 others (Presidential Election Petition E005, E002 & E004 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2022] KESC 43 (KLR) (29 August 2022) (Ruling)
[2022] KESC 43Supreme Court of Kenya84% similar
Youth Advocacy for Africa (YAA) & 7 others v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 17 others (Election Petition E002, E003 & E005 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2022] KESC 42 (KLR) (Election Petitions) (30 August 2022) (Ruling)
[2022] KESC 42Supreme Court of Kenya83% similar
Odinga & 16 others v Ruto & 10 others; Law Society of Kenya & 4 others (Amicus Curiae) (Presidential Election Petition E005, E001, E002, E003, E004, E007 & E008 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2022] KESC 54 (KLR) (Election Petitions) (5 September 2022) (Judgment)
[2022] KESC 54Supreme Court of Kenya82% similar
Odinga & 16 others v Ruto & 10 others; Law Society of Kenya & 4 others (Amicus Curiae) (Presidential Election Petition E005, E001, E002, E003, E004, E007 & E008 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2022] KESC 56 (KLR) (Election Petitions) (26 September 2022) (Judgment)
[2022] KESC 56Supreme Court of Kenya82% similar