africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2022] KESC 24Kenya

Dina Management Limited v County Government of Mombasa & 5 others (Petition 8 (E010) of 2021) [2022] KESC 24 (KLR) (Civ) (19 May 2022) (Ruling)

Supreme Court of Kenya

Judgment

Dina Management Limited v County Government of Mombasa & 5 others (Petition 8 (E010) of 2021) [2022] KESC 24 (KLR) (Civ) (19 May 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KESC 24 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the Supreme Court of Kenya Petition 8 (E010) of 2021 PM Mwilu, DCJ & V-P, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu, I Lenaola & W Ouko, SCJJ May 19, 2022 Between Dina Management Limited Petitioner and County Government of Mombasa 1st Respondent Chief Land Registrar 2nd Respondent Land Registrar, Mombasa 3rd Respondent Director of Surveys 4th Respondent Director, Physical Planning 5th Respondent Attorney General 6th Respondent (Being an Application for Leave to File a Supplementary Record of Appeal in Petition E010 of 2021) Ruling 1.Upon perusing the Notice of Motion taken out by the Petitioner/Applicant on 21st October, 2021 and filed on 3rd November, 2021, pursuant to Section 3 of the [Supreme Court Act](http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Acts/SupremeCourtAct_No7of2011.pdf)[,](http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Acts/SupremeCourtAct_No7of2011.pdf) Rule 17(1), (2) & (3) as well as Rule 36 of the [Supreme Court Rules](http://kenyalaw.org/kl/index.php?id=11080) to be granted leave to file a supplementary record, namely, the stamped and signed Notice of Appeal; and 2.Upon perusing the affidavit sworn by Dennis Nkarichia, an advocate in the law firm of Mohammed Muigai LLP, on 21st October, 2021 in support of the Motion; and 3.Upon considering the written submissions by the Petitioner/Applicant dated 27th October, 2021 filed on 3rd November, 2021, wherein the Petitioner/Applicant explains that the Record of Appeal was filed without a signed and stamped copy of the Notice of Appeal; that the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was occasioned by the delay of the Court of Appeal registry in supplying a signed and stamped copy of the said Notice of Appeal, although they had timeously electronically filed it on 17th June, 2021 in accordance with the Covid-19 Practice Directions on Electronic Case Management; and that the Petitioner/Applicant had made follow up with Court Registry without luck; and 4.Noting that the 1st Respondent in its relying affidavit and written submissions of 2nd November, 2022, is opposed to the application urging that the Petitioner/Applicant has not invoked Rule 15(2) to seek extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal as they ought to have; that it was the duty of the Petitioner/Applicant to scan and forward duly stamped and signed copies of the Notice of Appeal but failed to do so; that the Petitioner/Applicant has not provided evidence to show that the unsigned Notice of Appeal was lodged at the Court of Appeal registry; further that the Notice of Appeal on record was served outside the seven days of lodgement contrary to Rule 37, which issue has been raised by the 1st Respondent as a ground of objection to the appeal; and that, as a result, there is no valid Notice of Appeal; and 5.Further noting that the 2nd to 6th Respondents in their written submissions dated 9th December, 2021 filed on 10th of December, 2021, are not opposed to this application urging that the Notice of Appeal is an integral document of the Record of Appeal, that it is mandatory for a party intending to file an appeal to file one within 14 days of the date of the judgment appealed against; that the Petitioner/Applicant, having complied by electronically filing the notice within time, the delay in filing a stamped Notice of Appeal was not fatal; and that, in any case, the delay was occasioned by the Court of Appeal registry and not the Petitioner/Applicant;We now therefore opine as follows: 6.Having noted that the impugned Judgment was rendered on 4th June, 2021, the applicant proceeded to electronically file its Notice of Appeal on 17th June, 2021, within the time limited by Rule 36(1) of the Supreme Court Rules; and that subsequent to this, the Record of Appeal was duly instituted on 19th July, 2021, again within 30 days of filing the Notice of Appeal as prescribed in Rule 38; and 7.Acknowledging that by the provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Supreme Court Rules, pleadings and any other document filed in the Court must be in both printed and electronic form, as explained in the case of [Kenya Hotel Properties Limited v. Attorney General & 5 others](/akn/ke/judgment/kesc/2021/49); Application No. 2 of 2021 (E004 of 2021); [2021] eKLR; and 8.Satisfied therefore that the electronic Notice of Appeal was timeously lodged in the Court of Appeal strictly in accordance with Direction 8(3) aforesaid and subsequently filed in this Court within the time set, we find that it is properly on record and reject the objection by the 1st respondent, being satisfied that it was electronically served on 17th June, 2021 which was the same day that the Notice of Appeal was filed. 9.Because the award of costs is discretionary as the Court explained in [Jasbir Singh Rai & 3 others v Tarlochan Singh Rai & 4 others](http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/90132/), SC Petition No. 4 of 2012; [2014] eKLR, no party, in the instant case, is at fault hence we make no orders as to costs. 10.In the circumstances, we allow this application and make the following orders;aa. The Application dated 21st October, 2021, and filed on the 3rd November, 2021 is hereby allowed.b.There shall be no orders as to costs. **DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2022.****........................................****P.M. MWILU****...........................................****DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE & VICE PRESIDENT****OF THE SUPREME COURT****...................................****S.C. WANJALA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****......................................****NJOKI NDUNGU****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****.....................................****I. LENAOLA****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT****...................................****W. OUKO****JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** I certify that this is a true copyof the originalREGISTRARSUPREME COURT OF KENYA *[eKLR]: electronic Kennya Law Reports

Similar Cases

Dina Management Ltd v County Government of Mombasa & 5 others (Petition 8 (E010) of 2021) [2023] KESC 30 (KLR) (21 April 2023) (Judgment)
[2023] KESC 30Supreme Court of Kenya98% similar
Njenga v Republic & 3 others (Petition 10 of 2018) [2020] KESC 35 (KLR) (4 August 2020) (Judgment)
[2020] KESC 35Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar
Board of Management Buni Primary School v Freedom Limited & 4 others (Application E036 of 2024) [2025] KESC 47 (KLR) (15 August 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KESC 47Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar
Diasproperty Limited & another v Githae & 8 others (Petition E019 of 2024) [2025] KESC 19 (KLR) (11 April 2025) (Judgment)
[2025] KESC 19Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar
Commission v Oduor & 4 others (Petition 18 (E025) of 2021) [2022] KESC 10 (KLR) (Civ) (19 May 2022) (Ruling)
[2022] KESC 10Supreme Court of Kenya80% similar

Discussion