africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case LawGhana

Krah v The Republic (BE/TN/HC/F15/09/2025) [2025] GHAHC 194 (13 June 2025)

High Court of Ghana
13 June 2025

Judgment

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HELD AT TECHIMAN IN THE BONO EAST REGION ON FRIDAY THE 13th DAY OF JUNE 2025BEFOREHIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE KWAMEGYAMFIOSEI CASE NOBE/TN/HC/F15/09/2025 KWABENAKRAH :APPELLANT VRS THEREPUBLIC :RESPONDENT ========================================================================== JUDGMENT This is an appealagainst sentence by the Appellant. The Appellant aged 25was charged for defiling a 9 year old child under section 101 of the Criminal Offences Act 1969 [ACT 1 29/60] . He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to maximum 25 years stipulated by the law. His only ground ofappealis that thesentence was harshand praysforareduction. Arguing the appeal Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the should considered the age of the Appellant, the fact that he was a first offender, not known to the law and the fact that he did not waste the court’s time. He therefore submitted this courtshould tamperjustice with mercyand reduce thesentence. In response the Learned Assistant State Attorney submitted that she has taken notice of the fact that the Appellant did not waste the court’s time and that the Appellant was a young person and a first offender, however this court should also take into consideration the age of the victim and the fact that her innocence has been taken away fromher. From Exhibit “A’ that is the proceedings it appears that the trial Judge was infuriated by the Appellant’s statement that the victim forced him to have sex with him. That provocative statement should not have pushed the learned Judge to imposing the maximum sentence. That statement shows how immature the Appellant is. He is a young offender and the imposition of the 25 years would practically take away his life having regard to the living conditions in our prisons. As rightly conceded by the learned Assistant State Attorney the sentence was excessive and I am disposed to 2 reducing same. I therefore reduce the sentence of 25 years to 8 years imprisonment in hard labour. (SGD) KWAMEGYAMFIOSEI JUSTICEOF THE HIGH COURT TECHIMAN COUNSEL: ROSE MMABILAANFO(ASA) FORTHE RESPONDENT KOFI IDDRISSAHFOR THE APPELLANT 3

Similar Cases

Mpalu v The Republic (BE/TN/HC/F15/08/2025) [2025] GHAHC 201 (13 May 2025)
High Court of Ghana89% similar
Atta v S (CR/0075/2024) [2024] GHAHC 540 (12 December 2024)
High Court of Ghana80% similar
ABU MOHAMMED VRS THE REPUBLIC (J3/03/2023) [2024] GHASC 14 (17 April 2024)
Supreme Court of Ghana79% similar
Inusah v The Republic (CC15/037/2024) [2024] GHAHC 548 (29 October 2024)
High Court of Ghana78% similar
Rababalela v S (A15/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 833 (25 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 833High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)77% similar

Discussion