africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2026] KECA 59Kenya

Kitai alias Cheparakach v Republic (Criminal Application E055 of 2025) [2026] KECA 59 (KLR) (28 January 2026) (Ruling)

Court of Appeal of Kenya

Judgment

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM: KIMARU, JA (IN CHAMBERS) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E055 OF 2025 BETWEEN TIMOTHY KIPTANUI KITAI Alias CHEPARAKACH.....APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC .................................................................... RESPONDENT (Being an application for extension of time to appeal out of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Bungoma (M.S. Shariff, J) dated 27th June, 2025 in HCCRA No. E086 of 2021) *********************** RULING 1. The applicant was convicted of the offence of Robbery with Violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code by the Bungoma Chief Magistrate’s Court (CR. Case No. 746 of 2018). He was sentenced to serve twenty-five (25) years imprisonment. His appeal to the High Court against conviction was dismissed. However, the custodial sentence was that was imposed on him was enhanced to forty (40) years imprisonment. The applicant was aggrieved by the High Court’s verdict which was delivered on 27th June, 2025. He wishes to Page 1 of 2 appeal against the said decision to this Court. He has filed the present application seeking to be granted leave to file appeal out of time. The applicant explained that he Page 2 of 2 was prevented from lodging the appeal in time due to the fact that he was not availed the certified typed copies of the proceedings and Judgment in time. He pleads with the Court to exercise its discretion in his favour and grant the application. 2. The Application is not opposed by the respondent. Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules grants this Court unfettered discretion to extend time for any steps circumscribed by the Rules to be done outside the prescribed time. In the present application, the applicant has given satisfactory explanation for his failure to lodge the appeal in time. This Court will exercise its discretion in his favour. 3. The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time. The applicant shall file and serve the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days of today’s date. Dated and delivered at Kisumu this 28th day of January,2026. L. KIMARU ....................... JUDGE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of original. Page 3 of 2 DEPUTY REGISTRAR . Page 4 of 2

Similar Cases

Nyamage v Republic (Criminal Application E059 of 2025) [2026] KECA 227 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 227Court of Appeal of Kenya92% similar
Obwaro v Republic (Criminal Application E061 of 2025) [2026] KECA 87 (KLR) (28 January 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 87Court of Appeal of Kenya90% similar
Mongeri v Republic (Criminal Application E062 of 2025) [2026] KECA 224 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 224Court of Appeal of Kenya90% similar
Omullo v Republic (Criminal Application E025 of 2025) [2026] KECA 165 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 165Court of Appeal of Kenya85% similar
Kerich v Republic (Criminal Application E092 of 2025) [2026] KECA 222 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 222Court of Appeal of Kenya83% similar

Discussion