Case Law[2026] KEHC 1420Kenya
Agriculture Equipment Ltd v Ambani & another (Civil Appeal E1091 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 1420 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
[MILIMANI LAW COURTS]
THE CIVIL APPELLATE DIVISION
(Coram: A.C. Mrima, J.)
CIVIL APPEAL NO. E1091 OF 2024
-between-
AGRICULTURE EQUIPMENT LTD …………..……APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
-versus-
ANJELINE SHINYENZE AMBANI & BERNARD
SHIKOVOLO…………………………………………..APPLICANTS/RESPONDENT
S
RULING
1. This ruling is in respect to the application by way of a Notice of
Motion dated 23rd April 2025 where the Applicant sought to strike
out the appeal with costs as it was filed out of time and without
the leave of the Court. The Applicants argued that although leave
to appeal out of time was granted by the trial Magistrate on 30th
August 2024, the Learned Magistrate did not have such
jurisdiction as the order ought to have been granted by a Judge
under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21 of the Laws
of Kenya. The Applicants filed written submissions buttressing
their position.
2. The Respondent/Appellant neither filed any response nor written
submissions thereto. That notwithstanding, this Court will
nevertheless consider the application.
3. From the record, the instant appeal is in respect to a ruling
delivered on 14th March 2024 wherein the Appellant’s Notice of
Motion dated 16th February 2024 was partially allowed to the
extent of re-opening the matter and allowing a fresh hearing, but
the Appellant’s quest for leave to file a list of documents and any
further evidence was declined. When the ruling was rendered, the
Appellant preferred an appeal being Nairobi [Milimani] High Court
Civil Appeal No. E452 of 2024, by filing a Memorandum of Appeal.
Ruling – Nairobi [Milimani] High Court Civil Appeal No. E1091 of 2024 Page 1 of 3
The Respondents filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection which
was upheld on the grounds of lack of leave to lodge the appeal.
The appeal was subsequently dismissed. The Appellant then
returned to the trial Court and filed a Notice of Motion dated 14th
May 2024 wherein it sought the requisite leave. The application
was strenuously opposed by the Respondents, but ultimately
allowed vide a ruling delivered on 30th August 2024. Pursuant to
the leave granted, the instant appeal was, hence, lodged. It was
on the filing of the current appeal that the Respondents filed the
Notice of Motion dated 23rd April 2025 seeking to again strike out
the appeal on grounds that the leave was not granted by the
High Court.
4. Section 75 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 43 of the Civil
Procedure Rules provides for appeals from orders. Order 43 Rule
3 of the Civil Procedure Rules provides as follows: -
An application for leave to appeal under section 75 of the Act
shall in the first instance be made to the court making the order
sought to be appealed from, either orally at the time when the
order is made, or within fourteen days from the date of such
order.
5. The above provision has it that the application for leave to appeal
ought to, in the first instance, be made to the Court making the
order sought to be appealed from. In this case that Court is the
Magistrates Court and not the High Court. The Court was properly
moved by the Appellant and heard the Respondents’ objections
which were overruled and the application allowed. Therefore, this
Court finds that the objection raised by the Respondents in this
case does not hold and is for rejection.
6. In the end, the application is without merit and the following
orders do hereby issue: -
[a] The Notice of Motion dated 23rd April 2025 is
hereby dismissed with costs.
Ruling – Nairobi [Milimani] High Court Civil Appeal No. E1091 of 2024 Page 2 of 3
[b] Since the Appellant has already filed written
submissions on the main appeal, the
Respondents shall file and serve written
submissions within 14 days of this order.
[c] The matter shall be fixed for compliance before
the Hon. Deputy Registrar on a date to issue.
Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED at NAIROBI this 13th day of
February, 2026.
A. C. MRIMA
JUDGE
Ruling virtually delivered in the presence of:
Ms Wangui, Learned Counsel for the Appellant/Respondent.
Mr. Kaburu, Learned Counsel for the Respondents/Applicants.
Michael/Amina – Court Assistants.
Ruling – Nairobi [Milimani] High Court Civil Appeal No. E1091 of 2024 Page 3 of 3
Similar Cases
Ingati v Kumar & another (Civil Appeal E761 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1236 (KLR) (Civ) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1236High Court of Kenya82% similar
Emu-Inya Enterprises Ltd v Odinga (Civil Appeal E018 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 1488 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1488High Court of Kenya80% similar
Hk Motors Kenya Limited & 2 others v Ruguru (Civil Appeal E080 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 1131 (KLR) (6 February 2026) (Judgment)
[2026] KEHC 1131High Court of Kenya79% similar
Muchoki & another v Chege (Miscellaneous Civil Application E202 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1297 (KLR) (5 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1297High Court of Kenya79% similar
Nyaga & 8 others v Kash Mobile Limited (Small Claims Appeal E159 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1453 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1453High Court of Kenya78% similar