Case Law[2026] KEHC 1523Kenya
Maarufu v Republic (Miscellaneous Application E206 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 1523 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA COUNTY
COURT NAME: MOMBASA HIGH COURT
CASE NUMBER: HCCRMISCAPPL/E206/2023
SAID JUMA MAARUFU VS THE REPUBLIC
RULING
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA
MISC APPLICATION NO. E206 OF 2023
SAIDI JUMA MAARUFU...............................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...........................................................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
(Revision of sentence in Mombasa Magistrate Criminal Case NO. 101 OF 2020
delivered on 4 September 2023)
th
The undated Notice of Motion prepared by the Applicant is brought under Section 333
(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code . The Applicant prays that the period spent in
remand custody during his trial be computed into the seven years’ sentence awarded
by the trial court.
The Applicant was charged, convicted and sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment for the
offence of Rape contrary to Section 3 (1) (a) (b) as read with sub-section 3 of the Sexual
Offences Act no. 3 of 2006.
In his affidavit in support of the application, the applicant claims to have been in
remand custody from 12 August 2020 to 4 September 2023 when the sentence was
th th
passed. He is aggrieved that the period spent in remand was not considered into the
computation of the sentence awarded by the trial court.
I have considered the application and the affidavit in support of the same. The
Respondent has not opposed it nor submitted on the application, as at the time of
making this determination. The issue for consideration is whether the application has
merit and what orders this court should make.
The Judiciary of Kenya 1/
Doc IDENTITY: 28160842572397418776323244607 Tracking
3
Number:OOXNY82026
This court is mandated to consider the period the Accused person spent in remand
while his trial was on going in line with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure
Code Cap 75 (Laws of Kenya) .
The said Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that: -
“Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code (cap 63) every
sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the
day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided
in this Code Provided that where the person sentenced under subsection (1)
has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take
account of the period spent in custody”
Further, Clauses 7.10 and 7.11 of the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines
provide that: -
“The proviso to section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code obligates the
court to take into account the time already served in custody if the convicted
person had been in custody during the trial. Failure to do so impacts on the
overall period of detention which may result in an excessive punishment that is
not proportional to the offence committed. In determining the period of
imprisonment that should be served by an offender, the court must take into
account the period in which the offender was held in custody during the trial.”
The requirement under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code was
restated by the Court of Appeal in Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another vs
Republic [2018] eKLR.
Instantly I have perused the trial court’s record. The applicant was first arraigned in
court on 12 August 2020. Indeed, the applicant could not raise the bond terms and he
th
remained in custody throughout his trial. The application is merited. The sentence to
run from 12 August 2020 when the Applicant was first arraigned in court.
th
DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED at MOMBASA on this 12 DAY OF FEBRUARY
TH
2026.
Ruling delivered through Microsoft Teams Online Platform.
WENDY KAGENDO MICHENI
JUDGE
In the presence of;-
THE APPLICANT PRESENT IN PERSON
MR SIRIMA FOR THE STATE
BEBORA COURT ASSISTANT
SIGNED BY/FOR:
HON. LADY JUSTICE WENDY MICHENI
The Judiciary of Kenya 2/
Doc IDENTITY: 28160842572397418776323244607 Tracking
3
Number:OOXNY82026
THE JUDICIARY OF KENYA.
MOMBASA HIGH COURT
HIGH COURT CRIMINAL
DATE: 2026-02-12 12:56:05
Similar Cases
Republic v Ramadhan Mwinyi Mohammed (Criminal Case E004 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1518 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1518High Court of Kenya79% similar
Republic v Yaa & 2 others (Criminal Case E014 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1521 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1521High Court of Kenya77% similar
Republic v Ogina (Criminal Case E012 of 2020) [2026] KEHC 1555 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Sentence)
[2026] KEHC 1555High Court of Kenya77% similar
Republic v Otieno (Criminal Case E008 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1547 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1547High Court of Kenya77% similar
Republic v County Secretary, County Government of Meru & 4 others; Kaburu t/a Mwirigi Kaburu & Co. Advocates (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Case Judicial Review Application E013 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 716 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 716Employment and Labour Court of Kenya73% similar