africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[1964] NGHC 6Nigeria

JOHN OKORO v THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (M/6/64) [1964] NGHC 6 (28 January 1964)

High Court of Nigeria

Judgment

**JOH****N** **OKO****R****O** **(****APPE****L****LAN****T****)** **_v_.** **THE** **IN****SPECTOR-GENERAL** **O****F** **POLICE** **(RESPONDENT)** **(1964)** **All** **N.L.R.** **445** **Div****i****si****o****n:** High Court, Lagos **D****at****e** **o****f** **Judgment:** 28th January, 1964 **C****as****e** **Num****b****er:** M/6/64 **Before:** Onyeama, Ag. C.J. The appellant brought the application seeking an Order of the High Court, in its appellate jurisdiction, to remit the fees payable by him under Order II, rule 3 of the High Court of Lagos (Appeals) Rules, Cap. 80. **_HELD_**** _:_** The High Court has no jurisdiction to hear the application since the power to remit fees under Order II, rule 3 is expressly reserved to the Magistrate who is allowed a discretion in the matter. _Application_ _s_ _truck_ _out_ _fo_ _r_ _wan_ _t_ _o_ _f_ _jurisdi_ _ction:_ _La_ _w_ _s_ _r_ _e_ _f_ _er_ _r_ _e_ _d_ _t_ _o_ _:__-_ _H_ _i_ _g_ _h_ _Co_ _u_ _r_ _t_ _o_ _f_ _L_ _a_ _g_ _o_ _s_ _(__A_ _pp_ _e_ _al_ _s_ _)_ _R_ _u_ _le_ _s_ _,_ _Ca_ _p_ _._ _8_ _0_ _,_ _O_ _rd_ _e_ _r_ _I_ _I_ _,_ _ru_ _l_ _e_ _3_ _._ _Hi_ _g_ _h_ _Cou_ _r_ _t_ _o_ _f_ _La_ _g_ _o_ _s_ _Ac_ _t_ _,_ _P_ _ar_ _t_ _I_ _V_ _._ Onyeama, Ag. C. J. of Lagos:-The applicant seeks an order of this Court, in its appellate jurisdiction, remitting the fees payable under Order II, rule 3 of the High Court of Lagos (Appeals) Rules, on the ground of poverty. Order II, rule 3 also provides that "a Magistrate may remit in whole or in part any such fees on the ground of the appellant's poverty or other sufficient cause." This Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals from Magistrates' Courts is derived from statutory provisions, namely part IV of the High Court of Lagos Act, and is not inherent. It follows that in matters and causes on appeal to it, this Court must conform strictly to the statute conferring jurisdiction and can only make such orders as the law says it can. The power to remit fees is expressly reserved to the Magistrate who is allowed a discretion in the matter, and I am unable to discover any concurrent jurisdiction on the same matter in this Court. I must therefore decline jurisdiction and strike out the application. I inform the accused that he may apply to the Magistrate for the order he seeks. I express no opinion on what he should do or can do if the application is refused by the Magistrate. Application struck out.

Similar Cases

IRO EZERA v INYIMA NDUKWE (Appeal No. C/13a/1961) [1961] NGHC 21 (10 July 1961)
[1961] NGHC 21High Court of Nigeria71% similar
L.M v M.M (A5008/2021) [2024] ZAGPJHC 325 (28 March 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 325High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)69% similar
Chevron Nigeria Limited v Nwuche and Others (CA/PH/420/2005) [2016] NGCA 99 (14 December 2016)
[2016] NGCA 99Court of Appeal of Nigeria69% similar
Ezekiel Okoli v Morecab Finance (Nig) Ltd (S.C. 73/2002) [2007] NGSC 120 (3 March 2007)
[2007] NGSC 120Supreme Court of Nigeria68% similar
E1 Ranch (Pty) Ltd v Early Harvest Farming (Pty) Ltd (21 of 2017) [2017] SZSC 68 (1 December 2017)
[2017] SZSC 68Supreme Court of eSwatini68% similar

Discussion