Case Law[2026] KEHC 1158Kenya
In re Estate of Kantaben Ramniklal Naker (Deceased) (Succession Cause E199 of 2023) [2026] KEHC 1158 (KLR) (Family) (5 February 2026) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya
Judgment
Ruling
Succession Cause No. E.199 of 2023
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT MILIMANI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. E.199 OF 2023
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE KANTABEN
RAMNIKLAL NAKER (DECEASED)
NEETA NAKER …………………………………..……... 1ST
APPLICANT
PALLAVI MAHESHCHANDRA NAKER …………....2ND
APPLICANT
RULING
1. The Summons before the court is dated 28th July 2025. The
applicants pray for the following orders:
a)THAT this honourable court be pleased to
review its Ruling and/or orders dated 13th
February 2024 and the subsequent Certificate
of Confirmation of Grant of Probate of the
Estate of the late Kantaben Ramniklal Naker
(deceased) issued on 13th February 2024 to the
said Applicants Neeta Naker and Pallavi
Maheshchandra Naker in the following
respects:-
i. A 20% share in Aarem Investment
Partnership (Certificate of Registration
Number BN 216099) be included as item
E. OGOLA J. Page 1 of 4
Ruling
Succession Cause No. E.199 of 2023
no. 4 in the schedule of assets of the
deceased.
b)THAT the amended Certificate of Confirmation
of Grant reflecting the reviewed item be issued
accordingly.
c) THAT the costs of this application be provided
for.
2. The summons was based on the grounds set out therein
and the 1st applicant’s Supporting Affidavit.
3. The applicants deposed that they are executrices of the
Estate of the deceased, and at the time of the deceased’s
death, they were partners of Aarem Investments.
However, at the time the Grant of Probate was confirmed,
the asset known as 20% share in Aarem Investment
(Certificate of Registration Number BN 216099), belonging
to the deceased, was inadvertently omitted. The
applicants deposed that the omission was not deliberate
but due to an erroneous belief that Aarem Investment was
a defunct entity that had no value.
4. The Summons was not opposed.
Determination
5. I have considered the Summons and the entire record of
the court. The applicants pray that the Order of this court
dated 13th February 2024 and the subsequent Certificate
of Confirmation of Grant of Probate be reviewed on the
basis of the discovery of new assets belonging to the
E. OGOLA J. Page 2 of 4
Ruling
Succession Cause No. E.199 of 2023
estate that the executors were not aware of at the time of
Confirmation of Grant.
6. The remedy of review of court orders is not directly
provided for in the Law of Succession Act and the Probate
and Administration Rules, but it is imported into probate
practice by Rule 63 of the Probate and
Administration Rules, which has adopted a number of
procedures from the Civil Procedure rules. Among the
imported procedures is the device of review under the
Civil Procedure Rules. In the relevant rules on review
under the Civil Procedure Rules, an order of the court can
be revised on the grounds of an error on the face of the
record or discovery of new and important evidence that
was not available at the time of the making of the order
sought to be reviewed or for any other sufficient reason.
7. Where known assets are omitted from the schedule of the
property to be distributed, or the name of a known
beneficiary or heir is inadvertently left out of the
confirmation application, an application ought to be made
for review of the confirmation orders to accommodate the
said assets or beneficiaries on the basis that the said
assets or heirs were left out by mistake or error. Where
assets are discovered after the court has confirmed the
grant or a heir or survivor of the deceased who had
previously been unheard of materialises after distribution,
the court may review its orders made at the point of
confirming the grant on the ground of discovery of new
E. OGOLA J. Page 3 of 4
Ruling
Succession Cause No. E.199 of 2023
and important evidence that was not available at the time
the grant was being confirmed.
8. In view of the foregoing, the prayers in the Summons
dated 28th July 2025 are granted. The Confirmation of
Grant of Probate dated 13th February 2024, be amended to
include 20% share in Aarem Investment Partnership
(Certificate of Registration Number BN 216099), as item
no. 4 in the schedule of assets of the deceased. Costs of
the Summons be in the cause.
Orders accordingly.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 5th day of February 2026
………………………………………
E.K. OGOLA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
N/A for the Applicants
Gisiele Muthoni Court Assistant
E. OGOLA J. Page 4 of 4
Similar Cases
Sealine Limited v Naker & Naker (Suing in their capacity as the legal representatives of the Estate of Kantaben Ramniklal Naker) & 3 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E170 of 2024) [2026] KECA 73 (KLR) (30 January 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KECA 73Court of Appeal of Kenya72% similar
Cabinet Secretary for the National Treasury and Planning & 4 others v Okoiti & 52 others (Petition E031, E032 & E033 of 2024 (Consolidated)) [2024] KESC 57 (KLR) (5 September 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KESC 57Supreme Court of Kenya68% similar
Ngugi v Mwangi (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E010 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 665 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 665Employment and Labour Court of Kenya68% similar
Kiattu & another v Muhika & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 410 of 2019) [2026] KEELC 654 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 654Employment and Labour Court of Kenya68% similar
Kiarie & 2 others v Administrator of the Estate of John Wallace Mathare (Deceased) & 2 others (Civil Application 4 of 2020) [2020] KESC 37 (KLR) (Civ) (4 August 2020) (Ruling)
[2020] KESC 37Supreme Court of Kenya68% similar