Case Law[2026] KEELC 733Kenya
Mwale v Joel (Suing as an administrator of the Estate of Sarah Mbigula Migasa alias Sarah Migasa - Deceased) (Land Case (Originating Summons) E021 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 733 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
Employment and Labour Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT VIHIGA
ELCL (OS) CASE NO. E021 OF 2025
IN THE MATTER OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT CAP 22 LAWS
OF KENYA (Section 7)
BETWEEN
ROSEMARY NEKESA MWALE ………………………..………….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
EBBY KAVAYA JOEL ( Suing as an Administrator
of the estate of SARAH MBIGULA MIGASA
alias SARAH MIGASA(Deceased) …………………..…….……… DEFENDANT
RULING
This ruling is in respect of the Notice of Motion application dated 25th November
2025 brought by the applicant pursuant to the provisions of Order 40 Rules 1, 2, &
3, Order 51 Rule 1 Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B, 3A Civil Procedure
Act and sections 7 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act.
The application seeks for an order of temporary injunction to restrain the
respondent from exhuming the remains of the applicant’s late husband one
CHARLES MWALE from the suit property known as
ELCL(OS) NO. E021 OF 2025 1
KAKAMEGA/KEDOLI/179 pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
The application also seeks for an order that costs of the application be provided for.
The grounds upon which the application is brought are that the applicant together
with her late husband have had continuous, open, exclusive, uninterrupted and
hostile possession of the suit land for 48 years since the year 1977 and that the
respondent now threatens to exhume the remains of the applicant’s husband
contrary to law, dignity, customs and the applicant’s constitutional rights. That
exhumation is an irreversible act. That the applicant has established a strong prima
facie case under section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act and the principles of
adverse possession.
The application was supported by the averments in the Supporting Affidavit of
Rosemary Nekesa Mwale sworn on 25th November 2025 and the annexture thereto.
The application was heard by way of written submissions. Written submissions
dated 7th January 2026 were filed on behalf of the applicant by the firm of Vusha
Onsembe & Mambiri Advocates. Similarly, written submissions dated 16th January
2026 were filed by Makonjio, Nyaberi & Co Advocates. I have considered the rival
submissions.
The substantive relief sought is an order of temporary injunction. In order for the
application to succeed, the applicant needs to demonstrate a prima facie case with
ELCL(OS) NO. E021 OF 2025 2
a probability of success. Under Order 40 Rule 1 Civil Procedure Rules pursuant to
which the application was brought, an order of temporary injunction is granted to
stop the subject matter of the suit from being wasted, alienated or destroyed
pending hearing of the suit.
It is clear from the Supporting Affidavit that the suit land is the subject matter of
various litigation some of which is still active.
The applicant deposes in paragraph 18 of her Supporting Affidavit that the
exhumation which the application herein seeks to restrain is the subject of an
application in VIHIGA ELC APPEAL NO. E024 of 2024. Hence according to the
applicant, what constitutes the threat to exhume the body of the deceased is the
application in Vihiga ELC Appeal No E024 of 2024. In other word the applicant is
seeking an order of temporary injunction in this matter to stop an action in another
court matter. No explanation has been given why the order was not sought in the
said appeal.
Having considered the totality of the material placed before this court I find that
the applicant has not met the threshold for grant of an order of temporary
injunction as set in the case of Giella -vs Casman brown (1973) EA 358.
I further find that to the extent that the application is intended to challenge an
existing application in a different matter file, the application is misconceived.
ELCL(OS) NO. E021 OF 2025 3
The application is dismissed. Costs to the respondent.
Judgement dated and signed at Vihiga, delivered virtually this 12th day of
February 2026.
E. ASATI,
JUDGE.
In the presence of:
Ajevi--Court Assistant.
Muthoki h/b for Onsembe for the Applicant
Mbetera for the Respondent.
ELCL(OS) NO. E021 OF 2025 4
Similar Cases
China Communications Construction Co Ltd v South Seas Services Ltd (Environment and Land Case E105 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 705 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 705Employment and Labour Court of Kenya73% similar
Kaya v Koteene; Maroa (Suing as Representative of Mema Ebenezer Enterprises) (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case E008 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 373 (KLR) (2 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 373Employment and Labour Court of Kenya72% similar
China Communications Construction Co. Ltd v South Seas Services Ltd (Environment and Land Case E105 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 707 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 707Employment and Labour Court of Kenya72% similar
Muvanya v Insurance Regulatory Authority & 5 others; Chelimo (Interested Party) (Employment and Labour Relations Petition 48 of 2012) [2025] KEELRC 3755 (KLR) (18 December 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEELRC 3755Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya72% similar
Ndete v Kiminza (Environment & Land Case E048 of 2021) [2025] KEMC 87 (KLR) (28 April 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEMC 87Magistrate Court of Kenya71% similar