Case Law[2026] KEELC 577Kenya
Gikunji & another v Muthiru (Environment and Land Case E012 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 577 (KLR) (6 February 2026) (Judgment)
Employment and Labour Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO E012 OF 2023
MARGARET NYAWIRA GIKUNJI…………………..………………………1ST
PLAINTIFF
FREDRICK GITARI KATHUNGU……………………………….………….2ND
PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
JAMES MBURU MUTHIRU…….…………….………………………..……
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. This matter is in relation to property known as LR NO
NAIROBI/BLOCK 119/2674
2. The plaintiffs filed the originating summons application date 22nd
August 2023 seeking to be registered as the proprietor of the suit
property indicating that they had bought the suit property from the
defendant via a sale agreement dated 29th March 2004.That upon
purchase, they signed a transfer agreement and the defendant
release the certificate of title to them.That the defendant has failed
to release the relevant documents needed to effect registration of
the transfer of the suit property in the plaintiffs names .
1
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
3. The plaintiffs have pleaded despite several attempts to have the
defendant release the completion documents, the defendant has
neglected to do the same hence this application seeking for the
following orders
a. That this honourable court do direct that the plaintiffs be
registered as the proprietors of the parcel of land
Nairobi/Block 119/2674 measuring approximately 0.0233
hectares
b. That this honourable court be pleased to order the defendant
to sign all relevant papers to give effect to the registration of
LR NO NAIROBI/BLOCK 119/2674 to the plaintiffs.
c. That this honourable court be pleased to order the defendant
to urgently and immediately hand over the original Land
control Board consent to transfer all clearances, three certified
copies of identity card, there certified copies of KRA Pin
certificates, there passport size photos and all relevant
completion documents to the plaintiff’s advocate
d. That in default to comply with prayers 2 and 3 hereinabove,
the land registrar Nairobi Land registry be authorized to
transfer LR NO NAIROBI/BLOCK 119/2674 to the plaintiffs.
e. Costs of the application
f. Any other reliefs the honourable court may deem fit
2
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
4. The defendant was duly served as evidenced with the affidavit for
service of one Richard Mukai Njuguna sworn on the 22nd January
2025 but failed to enter appearance nor file a defence
5. The Matter proceeded for hearing on the 2nd July 2025 where the 1st
plaintiff appeared as PW1 and gave his evidence relied on his sworn
witness statement dated 18/8/2023 and the supporting affidavit.
She reiterated the fact that he bought the suit property via a sale
agreement from the defendant and acquired the certificate of title
to the same and also executed the transfer agreement. She stated
that the defendant had failed to produce the completion documents
to enable the said transfer and have the plaintiffs registered as the
legal owners
Analysis and Determination
6. Having looked at the pleadings filed by the plaintiff, and on
consideration of the submissions filed as well, the defendant having
not entered appearance nor put in a defense, I come to the
conclusion that the determination of the instant suit turns on only
one issue for determination and that whether the plaintiff is entitled
to the orders as prayed for in the Originating summons dated 22nd
August 2023.
I would like to bring to the attention of the court the case of Daniel
Kenga Katana & 4 others v Dzitu Toto Bokole & 3 others
[2022] eKLR which addressed the issue of uncontroverted
evidence. The learned judge in coming up with his judgment stated;
3
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
“The issue that the court has to deal with is whether the Plaintiff
discharged the burden of proof. The Plaintiff gave evidence to proof
ownership of the suit land by adducing oral and documentary
evidence which was uncontroverted. It is trite that uncontroverted
evidence is weighty and courts will rely on it to prove facts in
dispute. The evidence cannot be controverted by allegations in the
statement of defence if the defendants fail to call a witness to
adduce evidence and be cross-examined to test the evidence.” He
further went to quote was said by Justice Mwongo in Peter Ngigi
& Another (suing as legal representative of the Estate of Joan
Wambui Ngigi -v-Thomas Ondiki Oduor & Another 2019 eKLR
where he stated “The general position running through such
authorities is that uncontroverted evidence bears a lot of weight and
a statement of defence without any evidence to support the
assertions therein will amount to mere statements”. He went ahead
to dismiss the appeal based on the fact that the defendant never
participated in the hearing process neither did he adduce any
evidence alluding to the fact that he was not keen in defending the
claim. The same reasoning can be applied by this honourable court
since the defendant was of no show in the hearing process neither
did, he put in any response to the pleadings.
7. The plaintiffs produced documentary evidence as in their list of
documents. The plaintiff testified as PW1 and adduced a Copy of
Sale Agreement dated 29/03/2004. This agreement is between the
plaintiffs and the defendant herein over the suit property. It is not in
4
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
dispute that the plaintiffs are the purchasers in the agreement. The
agreement identifies the suit properties herein, has a consideration
and is signed by both parties. Also adduced was a Copy of the
transfer document in favour of the plaintiffs and a copy of title deed
over the suit property still in the defendants’ name. Clause 3 of the
sale agreement indicated that the vendor would hand over the
certificate of title upon execution of the agreement which speaks to
why the plaintiffs have the certificate of title in possession. The
evidence of the sale agreement, the transfer document and the
certificate of title point out to an existing sale that happened as
between the plaintiffs and defendants giving a clear history of how
the plaintiffs acquired the title to the suit property.
It has been established that a certificate of title is held to be prima
facie evidence of ownership of the stated land. This is provided for
in Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act which provides; -
“The certificate of title issued by the Registrar upon
registration or to a purchaser of land upon a transfer … shall
be taken by all courts as prima facie evidence that the person
named as proprietor of the land is the absolute and
indefeasible owner … and the title of that proprietor shall not
be subject to challenge, except –
(a)on the ground of fraud or misrepresentation to which the
person is proved to be a party; or
(b)where the certificate of title has been acquired illegally,
unprocedurally or through a corrupt scheme.”
5
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
8. I hold the view that the Plaintiffs have established their claim to title
is legitimate and are therefore entitled to the orders as in the
originating summons
Conclusion
9. The upshot of the following is that the Plaintiffs have established
their case on a balance of probabilities and are entitled to the orders
sought as in the originating summons and the court makes the
following orders
a. The plaintiffs be registered as the proprietors of the suit
property
b. That the defendant is hereby to sign all relevant papers to
give effect to the registration of LR NO NAIROBI/BLOCK
119/2674 in favour of the plaintiffs.
c. The defendant is to surrender the Land control Board consent,
three certified copies of identity card, there certified copies of
KRA Pin certificates, three passport size photos and all other
relevant completion documents to the plaintiff’s advocate
d. In default of the orders above the Land registrar Nairobi to
effect the transfer the suit property to the plaintiffs.
e. The defendant to bear the costs of the suit
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED virtually at NAIROBI on this 6TH day of
FEBRUARY 2026.
6
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
MOHAMMED N. KULLOW
JUDGE
Judgment delivered in the presence of: -
Ms. Wambui for the Plaintiffs
No appearance for the Defendant
Philomena W. Court Assistant
7
ELCL E012 OF 2023 J
Similar Cases
Kariuki v Gatheru & 3 others (Environment and Land Case 112 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 249 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 249Employment and Labour Court of Kenya85% similar
Suchi v Gathinji (Environment and Land Case E153 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 738 (KLR) (16 February 2026) (Judgment)
[2026] KEELC 738Employment and Labour Court of Kenya84% similar
Njuguna v Ndegwa; Trustees, Anglican Church of Kenya (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case 39 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 661 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Judgment)
[2026] KEELC 661Employment and Labour Court of Kenya84% similar
Kardalei & 13 others v District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer Transmara & 61 others (Environment and Land Case 013 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 569 (KLR) (9 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 569Employment and Labour Court of Kenya83% similar
Lagat v Cheruiyot (Environment and Land Case E030 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 670 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Judgment)
[2026] KEELC 670Employment and Labour Court of Kenya82% similar