Case Law[2026] KEELC 696Kenya
Analo v Shinali (Sued on behalf of the Estate of Rajiko Okwaro Isack) (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E023 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 696 (KLR) (4 February 2026) (Ruling)
Employment and Labour Court of Kenya
Judgment
R EPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT
KAKAMEGA
ELC MISC. CASE NO. E023 OF 2025
WYCLIFFE AMBUNYA ANALO…….………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
LIVINGSTONE ATIKA SHINALI (Sued on behalf
of the estate of RAJIKO OKWARO ISACK……
RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Before court is a Notice of Motion dated 4th April 2025
filed by the applicant seeking the following orders;
a)That this honourable court be pleased to
transfer Butere MC ELC NO. E046 OF 2022
(OS) from Butere Principal Magistrates Court
to itself for directions and for hearing and
final disposal thereof.
b)That costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application is premised on the supporting affidavit
of the applicant sworn on 4th April 2025. The applicant’s
case is that Butere MC ELC CASE NO. E046 OF 2022
(O.S) is a claim for land based on the doctrine of adverse
1
possession but that the Magistrates court now has no
jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter in view of
the determination by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal
No. E141 OF 2022. That it is imperative that the matter
in Butere be transferred to this court for hearing and
determination.
3. The application was opposed. The respondent filed a
preliminary objection dated 21st July 2025, where he
stated that the application was incompetent because it
sought to transfer a suit filed in a court without
jurisdiction.
4. The court directed parties to file written submissions in
support of their respective positions. On record are
submissions filed by the respondent dated 10th
November 2022 which the court has duly considered.
Analysis and determination.
5. The court has carefully considered the application, the
preliminary objection and submissions. The only issue
that arise for determination is whether the applicant
deserves the orders sought.
2
6. This court has the jurisdiction to transfer a suit from the
Magistrates court to this court, as provided for in
section 18 (1) (b) ( i ) of the Civil Procedure Act.
7. Section 38 (1) of the Limitation of Actions Act grants the
Environment and Land Court the jurisdiction to hear and
determine claims of adverse possession. In the case of
Patrick Ndegwa Munyua v Benjamin Kiiru &
Another [2020] KEELC 3911 (KLR), the Environment
and Land court held that Magistrates courts have
jurisdiction to hear and determine claims of adverse
possession. This court takes cognizance of the fact that
there are also other decisions of Environment and Land
Court where it was held that Magistrates courts have no
jurisdiction to hear and determine adverse possession
claims, like the decision of L.N. Mbugua J. in Philip
Kithaka v Mercy Karimi Nyaga [2021] e KLR. The
decisions for and against the jurisdiction of Magistrates
Court in respect of adverse possession claims being
decisions of the Environment and Land Court have been
the law, until the Court of Appeal settled the law in that
regard, in October 2024 in the case of Pauline
3
Chemuge Sugawara v Nairuko Ene Mutarakwa
Kiritu & 4 Others Civil Appeal No. E141 of 2022,
where it held that Magistrates Courts have no
jurisdiction to hear and determine adverse possession
claims.
8. Therefore, when Butere CMC ELC NO. E046 of 2022
(OS) was filed, as per the decision in Patrick Ndegwa
case, the Magistrates court had jurisdiction to
determine that matter. Therefore, the respondent’s
submission that Butere MC ELC CASE NO. E046 OF
2022 was filed in a court without jurisdiction and should
be dismissed and not be transferred to this court, lacks
justification as at the time of filing the said suit, the
Magistrates Court had jurisdiction to hear and
determine the same. The Magistrates court’s jurisdiction
having been taken away by the decision in the
Sugawara case, in view of provisions of Section 1A of
the Civil Procedure Act, and the circumstances of this
case I find that it is only just, fair, expeditious and
affordable to the parties that the suit in Butere is
transferred to this court for hearing and determination.
4
9. In the premises, I am satisfied that the application dated
4th April 2025 is merited and the same is hereby allowed.
Consequently, Butere MC ELC CASE NO. E046 of 2022
(OS) is hereby transferred from the Magistrates Court at
Butere to this court for hearing and determination. I
make no order as to costs.
10. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA
IN OPEN COURT/VIRTUALLY THROUGH
MICROSOFT TEAMS VIDEO CONFERENCING
PLATFORM THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026
A.NYUKURI
JUDGE
In the presence of
No appearance for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Court Assistant: Delphine
5
Similar Cases
Kilonzo v Kiige; Embakasi Ranching Company (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E285 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 533 (KLR) (6 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 533Employment and Labour Court of Kenya82% similar
Nganga v Lagat (Sued as the Administratrix of the Estate of the Late Christopher Kimaru Lagat) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 672 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 672Employment and Labour Court of Kenya81% similar
Kiattu & another v Muhika & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 410 of 2019) [2026] KEELC 654 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 654Employment and Labour Court of Kenya81% similar
Republic v Land Registrar Nairobi Ardhi House & another; Medallion Properties Limited (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E030 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 411 (KLR) (3 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 411Employment and Labour Court of Kenya81% similar
Uphill Crops Limited v Ole Koti & 2 others (Environment and Land Case E017 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 531 (KLR) (9 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELC 531Employment and Labour Court of Kenya80% similar