Case Law[2026] KEELRC 213Kenya
Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions Hospitals and Allied Workers v Sucham Investment Limited t/a Amani Tiwi Beach Resort (Cause E032 of 2023) [2026] KEELRC 213 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Judgment)
Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
Judgment
Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions Hospitals and Allied Workers v Sucham Investment Limited t/a Amani Tiwi Beach Resort (Cause E032 of 2023) [2026] KEELRC 213 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2026] KEELRC 213 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Cause E032 of 2023
M Mbarũ, J
January 29, 2026
Between
Kenya Union of Domestic Hotels Educational Institutions Hospitals and Allied Workers
Claimant
and
Sucham Investment Limited t/a Amani Tiwi Beach Resort
Respondent
Judgment
1.The background to the judgment is a partial consent agreement of 17 June 2025.
2.The parties consented that:The sum of Ksh. The amount of 33,242,946.08 is to be paid to the claimant within 14 days. The balance of Ksh. 32,872,024.32 to be addressed by the parties in written submissions.
3.The consent order was adopted as follows:a.The respondent is to pay the undisputed sum of Ksh. 33,343,946.08 within 30 days.b.On the balance, the parties to file written submissions with the respondent filing within 14 days.c.The claimant is to file within 14 days upon service.d.In default of (a) above, the payment of the undisputed sum, execution to issue.
4.The respondent did not pay as agreed. Execution proceedings have since taken effect.
5.To assist the court, the County Labour Officer, Kwale, has filed a report dated 24 May 2024 in the matter. This report includes the tabulations of the terminal due to the claimant members, the grievants. Each grievant's dues are assessed, with the total dues being Ksh. 66,314,973.
Claim
6.The claimant is a registered trade union, and the respondent is a registered business providing hospitality, hotel, and catering services.
7.The claimant represents unionised employees within the respondent, the grievants. The respondent maintained membership of the Kenya Association of Hotelkeepers and Caterers (KAHC)
8.The claimant entered into a collective agreement (CBA) with KAHC, under which the respondent is covered and bound. The CBA contained terms and conditions of service for employees in various departments, including food production, housekeeping, laundry attendants, maintenance, room stewards, and waitpersons.
9.In 2020, after the COVID pandemic, the respondent terminated the grievants' employment without adhering to the procedures set out in the CBA. They were issued an infinite number of notices to be away from work and only learned later that their employment had been terminated.
10.The claim is that the respondent officer, the general manager, the human resources manager, and the financial controller promised to pay terminal dues without specifying an effective date. The claimant issued demand notices without success, leading to the dispute being reported to the Minister without resolution. The claimant filed suit seeking orders that:a.Judgment be entered against the respondent for unlawful and unfair termination of employment of the grievants in contravention of section 43 of the [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11).b.Judgment be entered against the respondent for unlawful and unfair declaration of redundancy.c.The court to order the respondent to pay terminal dues, including the following:i.Service charge;ii.Salary deductionsiii.Certificate of serviced.Order that the respondent violates section 88 of the [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11).e.An order of reinstatement and payment of back wages and dues.f.Costs of the suit.
11.The claimant attached the list of the 133 grievants subject to the claim. The terminal dues owed were tabulated for each grievant.
12.The dues tabulated include the following:a.Notice pay,b.Severance pay;c.Unpaid service charge; andd.12 months' compensation.
13.In reply, the respondent denied the claim and stated that it was not in control of events in 2020 related to the COVID pandemic. Following the pandemic outbreak, all due procedures were adhered to, including issuing notices to all employees.
14.The grievants, through the claimant, unfairly refused to accept a payment plan that was manageable in the prevailing circumstances amid the pandemic. The claim members have absconded from duty and, to date, have refused the return-to-work formula, opting to sue the respondent.
15.The respondent denied being a party to the subject CBA referred to by the claimant. And hence its claim should be dismissed with costs.
16.The written submissions are analysed, and the issues for determination are whether there was unlawful and unfair termination of employment, whether there is a case of redundancy and whether the terminal dues claims for the 133 grievances are justified.
Determination
17.The context above, with the background of partial consent and payment of the terminal dues, is essential.
18.The circumstances leading to the termination of the grievants' employment are not contested. The fact of the covid pandemic is also not challenged.
19.However, the claim is that there is no due process in declaring redundancy, leading to the unfair termination of the employment of the 133 grievants.
20.In response, the respondent asserts that the grievants absconded from duty, refused the return-to-work form, and rejected the offer to pay their terminal dues in instalments.
21.The employment fact is not challenged. As the employer, the respondent had control under sections 35, 41, and 44 of the [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11) when the grievants refused to attend work or deserted their work stations without justification. Where the employer, due to the pandemic or any other cause, fails to address it as an operational matter, it cannot turn around and blame the employee. The essence of section 40 of the Act is to secure the employer who is faced with a situation such as the one the respondent was in 2020 due to the pandemic. Due to the obvious operational challenges, declare a redundancy, pay the dues and allow the employee to leave.
22.In the case of Angela Shikuru Kondonga v Airtel Kenya Limited [2016] eKLR and the case of Al-Barakat Agency Limited v Bwetta (Appeal E134 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3460 (KLR). The courts have emphasised that, despite operational matters such as the COVID pandemic, the employer is well protected under Section 40 of the CT.
23.In this regard, the court takes judicial notice of the fact that, following the COVID pandemic, the Minister and the Social Partners in relations took action and published a moratorium. In this case, the court also directed the County Labour Officer to go to the shop floor, retrieve the work records from the parties, and tabulate the lawful dues and the entitlements to the grievants.
24.Under sections 40, 43, and 45 of the Act, where the employer fails to comply with due process of law in laying off employees for operational reasons, the redundancy becomes unlawful. Despite having a justification for the covid pandemic, the due process requirements of sections 40 and 43 of the Act apply.
25.In this case, there was an unlawful declaration of redundancy, leading to the unfair termination of employment for the 133 grievants and claimant members.
26.The report of the County Labour Officer, Kwale, dated 24 May 2024, is imperative to apply in assessing the terminal dues owed to the grievants for the following:a.Notice pay based on the number of years worked per the CBA,b.Severance pay for years worked,c.Pay for the accrued leave days,d.Unpaid salaries,e.Service charges under the CBA terms,
27.The following dues are awarded: No. | Name | Total (Kshs)
---|---|---
1 | James Kenga Charo | 399,194
2 | Fredrick Kasala Otieno | 461,259
3 | Karoli Muga Omolo | 406,637
4 | Mdoe Bemwaka Kadi | 336,053
5 | Said Rashid | 666,767
6 | Hamisi Rashid Mwayuya (Deceased) | 532,351
7 | William Dzombo | 460,865
8. | Ali Hussein Mkalla | 370,303
9 | Mwacharo Alawe Mwacharo | 359,029
10. | Mwanamkuu Ali Dzivwa | 573,370
11 | Nassir Said Mwakauli | 550,905
12 | Abbas Abdalla Juma | 373,186
13. | Camlus Ochieng Baraza | 514,725
14 | Rebeccah Khayumbi Wasike | 399,194
15. | Mwanajuma Juma Ndeka | 413,635
16. | Amina Salim Mwazondo | 538,795
17. | Mwanajuma Omar Mwero | 429,409
18. | Albanus Kioko Kieti | 808,957
19 | Saddick Rimba Charo | 819,118
20 | Mohammed Nyanje | 727,878
21. | Mribe Mwambega | 959,918
22 | Salim Juma Mgala | 673,190
23 | Naomi Sholo Wawasi | 471,400
23 | Rashid Mohammed Saria | 861,917
24. | Mwinyi Nassoro Mwasurutani | 245,935
25. | Kisali Nickson | 329,431
26. | Mwalimu Salim Mwishee | 392,776
27 | Rajab Mselem Katengezi | 335,514
28 | Brian Kibet Mengwa | 581,598
29. | Sila Mulinge | 443,514
30. | Nyiro Mweru | 443,514
31 | Pendo Tuva Mgandi | 786,828
32. | Nickson Liova | 509,702
33. | Mwanaidi Rashidi Matuh | 463,718
34 | Musee Yusuf Makiti | 477,015
35 | Mebakari Bakari Matamu | 405,862
36 | Hidaya Juma Kulembwa | 486,808
37 | Mwahui Mbui | 307,801
38 | Mohamed Ali Jaffa | 231,778
39. | Athman Rashid Chidzuga | 278,643
40. | Salim Mohammed Mwasema | 509,634
| Fredrick Mwangolo Mwatua | 547,878
Kadiri Ali Kijito | 955,070
Kevin Muleli Kavagi | 337,638
Stephen Muoki Musyoka | 343,299
Mohammed Ismat | 660,041
Swaleh Suleiman Masemo | 442,514
Hamisi Hassan Tabalu | 301,257
Kennedy Ochieng Obar | 485,922
Robert C. Munga | 415,164
Juma Shaban Juhudi | 296,177
Benstone Malika Wasidia | 974,532
Govi Dzila Govi | 443,552
Victor Ndunda Kieke | 1,077,797
Abdallah Bakari Sheria | 312,070
Salama Mwinyi Mwakodi | 509,032
James Onkui Ongeta | 308,000
Abdallah Mohamed Mwaisha | 460,388
Samuel Muli | 502,215
Hamisi Salim Lwambi | 636,280
Bakari Salimu Chivwato | 93,117
Ali Mrisa Kabi | 699,163
Jonathan Mengele | 725,964
Juma Mohammed | 514,736
Mejumaa Juma | 575,671
Fanel Yida Lusava | 610,798
Twalib Ali Mwaricha | 571,471
Mohammed Guya | 822,662
Salama Masoud | 573,386
Joy Ambia Sigar | 379,625
Hussein Salim Mwatumwa | 399,194
Kennedy Abusa | 651,978
Franklin Gona | 539,625
Salim Abdallah Chikoso | 507,612
Karisa Ngumbao | 364,055
Rashid Mwaisa | 583,622
Simon Munga | 643,641
Sammy K. Munyithya | 779,565
Ali Kizungu Kijoto | 752,764
Salim Mohammed Abeid | 702,310
Jumaa S. Mwacheo | 702,310
Stephen Ruwa | 509,664
Hamisi Mwaliganza | 733,670
Hassan Ali Kkoyo | 477,669
Halima Hassan | 521,962
John Karanja | 710,528
Juma Salim Masito | 475,600
Joseph Kahindi Charo | 345,494
Peter Otieno | 568,135
Fatuma Mohammed Mwajora | 399,194
Halima Abdalla | 537,189
Irene Kauchi Farrah | 510,624
Sharon Mbeyu Mwangombe | 670,949
Hamisi Foro | 217,089
Hemedi Hamisi | 452,001
Abdallah Mwashobo | 480,224
Abdallah Salim Mataza | 810,917
Evans Onyisa | 399,515
Sifa Peter | 284,680
Idd Hamisi Mwakuchengwa | 398,703
Benard Tsaka Chokweh | 690,614
Suleiman Omar | 434,192
Domnic Owino | 325,576
Thoma Onsare Mbonga | 434,192
Charles Lando | 778,472
Silas Mwawasi | 719,519
John Kitali (Deceased) | 396,711
Robert Maganga | 770,498
Chrispin Ngoma | 364,056
Enock Orina | 420,981
Suleiman Ramadhani Mwachinazo | 429,078
Christine Chiro Karisa | 444,471
Alice Adhiambo | 384,752
Isaac Nyangali | 684,774
Hamadi Ali Mwanditi | 477,669
Benson Mwendwa | 596,357
Mwasambu Lewa Zomolo | 577,801
Shaban Fadhili | 583,427
Muriki Peter Nderitu | 497,130
Samuel Charo | 532,227
Josess Muthini | 527,550
Mazoe Mohamed | 471,113
Shaban Ndurya | 318,869
Edward Kyalo Jackson | 579,122
Nasir Shaban | 429,271
Charles Ouko Ogutu | 397,164
Doreen Ziro | 332,408
Erick Gumba Miruka | 576,861
Grand Total | 66,218,883
46.The claimant has since been partially paid upon execution of the partial consent. Such shall be offset from the total balance due. Each party to bear its costs.
**DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT MOMBASA ON THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026.****M. MBARŨ****JUDGE**
Similar Cases
Kenya Hotels & Allied Workers’ Union v Southern Palms Beach Resort; Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Educational Institutions, Hospitals & Allied Workers (Interested Party) (Cause 120 of 2005) [2006] KEIC 5 (KLR) (31 August 2006) (Order)
[2006] KEIC 5Industrial Court of Kenya81% similar
Kenga v Whitesands Hotel (Cause 19 of 2013) [2013] KEIC 625 (KLR) (26 July 2013) (Judgment)
[2013] KEIC 625Industrial Court of Kenya76% similar
Doyo v Kenya Safari Lodges & Hotels & another (Cause 202 of 2013) [2013] KEIC 579 (KLR) (27 September 2013) (Ruling)
[2013] KEIC 579Industrial Court of Kenya75% similar
Maluki v Sandies Tropical Village (t/a Palm Hotel (K) Ltd) (Cause 26 of 2014) [2014] KEIC 795 (KLR) (7 November 2014) (Judgment)
[2014] KEIC 795Industrial Court of Kenya74% similar
Wandera & another v Driftwood Beach Club Ltd (Cause 41 of 2013) [2013] KEIC 603 (KLR) (6 September 2013) (Judgment)
[2013] KEIC 603Industrial Court of Kenya73% similar