Case Law[2026] KEELRC 65Kenya
Kenya Union of Sugar Plantation & Allied Workers v Busia Sugar Industry Limited (Cause 56 of 2021) [2026] KEELRC 65 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Ruling)
Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT BUNGOMA
CAUSE NO. 56 OF 2021
(FORMERLY KISUMU 13 OF 2021)
KENYA UNION OF SUGAR
PLANTATION & ALLIED WORKERS.…………...…APPLICANT
VERSUS
BUSIA SUGAR INDUSTRY LIMITED.……………RESPONDENT
(BEFORE HON. JUSTICE DAVID NDERITU)
RULING
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In a notice of motion dated 17th April 2025 (the application) the
applicant is seeking for orders that –
(i) Spent.
(ii) This Honourable Court be pleased to set aside, review and vary
its orders/directives given on the 25th March 2025 which in
effect has closed the suit.
(iii) The court be pleased to reinstate/reopen the suit.
2. The application is expressed to be founded on Rules 44 & 74 (1) &
(3) of the Employment and Labour Relations
Court(Procedure)Rules, 2024, Sections 1A & 1B of the Civil
PAGE
1
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Articles 41, 50 & 159 of the
Constitution. It is based on the grounds on the face of it.
3. The application is supported with the affidavit of Jeremiah Akhonya,
an officer of the applicant, sworn on 17th April 2025 with several
annexures thereto.
4. In opposition to the application the respondent filed a replying
affidavit sworn by Philip Jackah Ipapu on 29th October 2025.
5. By consent, the court directed that the application be canvassed by
way of written submissions.
6. The applicant’s representative, Mr. Akhonya, filed written
submissions on 16th October 2025. The respondent did not file
submissions.
II. EVIDENCE
7. In the supporting affidavit, it is deponed that the court in its ruling of
6th February 2025 directed the applicant to provide a list of its
members working with the respondent within 14 days from that date.
8. It is deponed that the applicant sent its two officers to the
respondent’s factory to find out its exact membership but they were
denied entry.
9. The deponent stated that on 19th March 2025 he personally sought
audience with the respondent but he was denied entry into the
respondent’s factory on the grounds that the respondent was pursuing
the matter on appeal.
PAGE
2
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
10.It is deponed that the applicant was forced to physically interrogate
employees to find out the members as all the union shop stewards
had either been threatened not to engage with the applicant or their
contracts had been terminated. It is deponed that this process delayed
the availing of the list as directed by the court.
11.It is further deponed that on 21st March 2025, the applicant managed
to draw and file the list of its members, in compliance with the
court’s ruling of 6th February 2025.
12.It is deposed that on 25th March 2025 when the matter was coming up
for directions, the deponent experienced technical challenges while
logging into the virtual court. It is stated that when he was finally
able to log-in he was informed that his matter had been dealt with
and he was directed to follow up with the registry whereby it was
confirmed that the file had been closed.
13.It is deponed that after consultations with the applicants’ general
secretary, a letter to apply for the reopening of the file was written
dated 2nd April 2025 after which the formal application was filed.
14.It is deponed that the present application is to request the court to set
aside its directive of 25th March 2025 and reopen the file in the
interest of justice to enable the respondent’s workers enjoy the rights
to unionization pursuant to Articles 41 of the Employment Act,
Sections 4 & 5 of the Labour Relations Act, and ILO Convention
87.
PAGE
3
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
15.In the replying affidavit the respondent states that the application is
not merited as it seeks to restore an application for contempt that the
court had issued orders on. It is further stated that the applicant failed
to comply with the court’s directions as directed in the contempt
application proceedings. It is advanced that had the applicant been
keen on complying with the court order the present application would
not have been necessary.
16.The respondent states that the purported members of the applicant
alleged to be in its employ have either left its employ or no longer
wish to be union members and thus do not wish to have their dues
deducted.
III. SUBMISSIONS
20.The applicant’s representative reiterated the grounds in the
application and urged the court to reopen the cause to ensure that the
orders of the court issued on 30th November 2023 for the employer to
deduct and submit union dues are not rendered nugatory.
21.It is submitted that the court in allowing the application shall ensure
that the respondent’s workers do not lose their right to join a union
and associate and represented by a union.
22.It is submitted that the application has been brought without
inordinate delay and hence the file should be reopened to ensure the
enlisted workers are accorded justice.
PAGE
4
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
IV. ANALYSIS & DETERMINATION
23.The court has carefully read and considered the application, the
affidavit in support, the replying affidavit, and the
written submissions by the applicant’s representative. The following
issue commends itself to the court for determination – Whether an
order to reopen the file should issue?
V. RE-OPENING A FILE
24. In its ruling of 6th February 2025 the court directed as follows –
“In the interest of justice and in order to bring this matter to its
logical conclusion, the claimant is ordered to avail in court a list
of its members in employment on the respondent within 14 days
hereof for the court to issue further order(s) or directions.
Failure to do so the court shall proceed to close this file.”
25.The matter came up for mention on 25th February 2025 when neither
party appeared. A mention notice was issued for 25th March 2025
when again neither party appeared and the court proceeded to close
the file as per its directions in the ruling cited above.
26.The applicant stated that as of 25th March 2025 it had complied with
the court direction and filed a list of 38 of its members who are in the
respondent’s employment. The respondent in the replying affidavit of
Mr. Ipapu states that the members of the applicant alleged to be in its
employment do not wish to be the applicant’s members and that other
members have left employment.
PAGE
5
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
27.The court notes that the respondent, apart from purporting that the
alleged members are not in its employment or do not wish to be
unionized, did not attach any list of the alleged members who have
allegedly either left its employment or do not wish to be members of
the union.
28.The decision whether or not to reopen a matter is discretionary but
dictated by the interests of justice. The reason advanced by the
applicant’s representative that he had technical challenges that
prevented him from logging into the virtual court is reasonable.
29.The application was made promptly, barely a month after the file was
closed. The court has taken into account that the respondent has not
demonstrated any irreparable prejudice that would be occasioned if
the file is reopened. All that the court had requested for was the
claimant to avail the list which is now said to have been filed late.
30.In any event, the right to a fair hearing under Article 50 and the
principles in Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution obligate the court
to apply all lawful means to hear all parties to the greatest extent
unless the parties themselves make it impossible to be heard.
31.Consequently, the application dated 17th April 2025 is allowed with
no orders as to costs.
VI. ORDER
32. The court orders and directs that –
PAGE
6
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
(i) The order issued on 25th March 2025 be and is hereby set
aside.
(ii) The file is hereby reopened for further orders/directions.
(iii) No orders as to costs.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED, AND SIGNED AT
BUNGOMA THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2026.
....................................
DAVID NDERITU
JUDGE
PAGE
7
RULING – BUNGOMA ELRC CAUSE. NO. 56 OF 2021
Similar Cases
West Kenya Sugar Company Limited v Olak (Appeal E031 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 314 (KLR) (5 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELRC 314Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya80% similar
Nyanza Club v Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union (Miscellaneous Case E076 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 288 (KLR) (3 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELRC 288Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya80% similar
Oyawa v Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union (Employment and Labour Relations Cause E010 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 264 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Judgment)
[2026] KEELRC 264Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya80% similar
Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Morals Business Consulting Ltd & another (Cause E100 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 387 (KLR) (17 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELRC 387Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya78% similar
Mrima v C. K Bett Traders Limited & another (Cause E024 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 318 (KLR) (4 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELRC 318Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya78% similar