Case LawGhana
The Republic v Mahama (B6/O7/2025) [2025] GHADC 258 (14 February 2025)
District Court of Ghana
14 February 2025
Judgment
IN THE JUVENILE COURT TECHIMAN HELD ON 14TH FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE
HER WORSHIP SANDRA XORLALI LAVISON SITTING AS AN ADDITIONAL
MAGISTRATE WITHMADAMELLENWHITE ANDMR. SOLOMON
SUITNO.B6/O7/2025
THE REPUBLIC
VRS.
IBRAHIMMAHAMA
JUVENILE-Present with grand-father and grand-uncle
COMPLAINANT-Present withher parents.
PROSECUTION–D/Inspr. FamousAgbasahfor the Republic
LEGAL REPRESENTATION-No legalrepresentation
JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND
The Juvenile,16years of age was on 29th November 2024 charged before this Court with
one (1) count of Defilement of a female aged 9years contrary to Section 101(1) of the
Criminal Offences Act1960(Act 29).
Particulars of Offence: Ibrahim Mahama for that you on 19th November, 2024 at
Kenten and within the jurisdiction of this Court did carnally know one Nimatu
Mapuchi Salia afemale of9years.
Brief Facts as per the Charge sheet: Complainant in this case is Gawusu Salia aged 43
years, a driver whiles the victim Nimatu Mapuchi Salia aged 9years a pupil at Taudi
English Arabic School at Kenten. Juvenile Offender Ibrahim Mahama aged 17 years has
completed Junior High School. They all stay in the same house. On 19/11/2024 at about
6:30pm the victim’s mother Abdul Rahman Fauzia sent her to buy her kenkey. The
victim on her way home met Juvenile Offender. He held the victim’s hand and took her
toanuncompleted building nearby.
He then pushed her to the ground, removed her panty, inserted his penis into her
vagina and forcibly had unprotected sex with her. In the cause of the act one Gamusel
came to catch them and went and inform the victim’s mother. As at that time the father
of the victim was not around. On 27/11/2024 the complainant lodged a complainant
with the Police. Complainant was issued with a medical form to send the victim to the
hospital for examination, treatment and endorsement. The victim was sent to Holy
Family Hospital where she was treated and examined. On 28/11/2024, the Juvenile was
arrested and the complainant returned to Police the medical form of the victim duly
endorsed by the medical OFFICER of the Holy Family Hospital, Techiman which partly
reads as follows: THE VULVA APPEARS CLEAN AND HEALTHY, THERE IS AN
OLD LOOKING ABRASION ON VAGINA VESTIBULE WHICH IS NOT
BLEEDING, THE HYMENAPPEARS TORNED.
Statement was obtained from the complainant. The juvenile offender in his cautioned
statement admitted the offence. Juvenile was then charged with the offence stated on
thecharge sheet.
On 31st January 2025 when the matter came up for hearing, the Juvenile pleaded guilty
to the charge and was convicted on his own plea of guilty. The Court adjourned for the
socialenquiry reporttobe submittedbefore sentencing the Juvenile.
TheSocial Enquiry Report.
The Juvenile Court is always guided by Section 24(1) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2003
(Act 653) in sentencing a juvenile and it states “where a juvenile is charged with an
offence, the Juvenile Court shall order a social enquiry report (SER) to be submitted to
theCourtwhich shall betaken intoaccountwhen makinganorder”
The Probation Officer Mr.Addae Kusi Isaac conducted investigations and submitted his
report to the Court. The report revealed the nature of the offence, the character,
background and home surroundings of the Juvenile as well as the circumstances that
ledtothe offence committed.
The SER gathered that the Juvenile is 16 years old who lost his mother at the tender age
of5and isyet tomeethis biological father.
A significant part of his childhood years was spent with his Uncle known as Latif in
Kadelso in Kintampo, where he completed his Junior High School education. He came
to Techiman to live with his maternal grandfather after JHS. The grandfather is a 79
year old man and unemployed, however has been the one taking full responsibility of
the Juvenile since his childhood. The Juvenile is currently a first year student at the
Gyarko Senior High School in Techiman. He seems not to have any known friends. The
Report indicates that there are no adverse findings against him except for this incident.
The Juvenile admitted that he committed the offence as narrated above. The Report
indicates that the Juvenile showed some remorse during the interview and believes that
the Juvenile’s behavior could be attributed to lack of good parental control. He also
intimates that the possibility of the offender committing an offence such as this again
could be very low if he is under good parental control. Per the Report, the Juvenile
Offender is currently under the care and controlof his grand-uncle, Mr.Adama Yakubu
and it seems promising.
The Report indicates that the victim seems to be emotionally down and psychologically
insensitive during the interview. As indicated above per the medical report, she was
sexually assaulted and obviously this is atraumatizing experience for her.
The Report recommend that the Juvenile is sent to the Senior Correctional Centre a year
forthe purpose ofreformationand the Victim be give psychological counselling.
Mitigation
The Court takes note of the fact that the Juvenile pleaded guilty simpliciter thereby
saving the Court the time from conducting a full trial. The SER also revealed that the
Juvenile was a first time offender. He is also a first year student at Gyako Senior High
School,Techiman.
The Juvenile’s 79year old grandfather openly apologized to the parents of the Victim
and pleaded with themtoallowhimto
a. Pay forthe medical expensesofthe Victim
b. Prayed the Court to be lenient with Juvenile and permit him to continue his
education.
The Juvenile whengiven theopportunityby theCourttosay something inmitigation
seemed not tohaveanything tosay.The Courtfinds that eventhoughhe pleaded with
theJuvenile’smotherand the Victim, he didnot showenoughremorse. The Court’s
observationis thathe doesnot appreciate theenormity ofthe offence committed.
Analysis
The Juvenile herein was charged for the defilement of a child under sixteen (16) years of
age contrary to Section 101 (2) of the Criminal Offences Act 1960 (Act 29). He pleaded
guilty simpliciter and was convicted on his own plea of guilty. The law requires that in
determining the sentence to impose on a juvenile, the juvenile’s best interest must be
the paramount consideration. This consideration should take into cognizance the nature
of the offence committed and the prescribed punishment as well. That is to say that
whatever considerations the court resorts to should be proportional to the seriousness
of the offence committed by the juvenile. It should also be geared more at reforming the
juvenile rather than a punishment. The Court believes that considering the
circumstances ofthe case and the behaviorof theJuvenile it will be in his best interest to
detain him for the next three (3) years where he will continue his education. The Court
believesthathe will come out asareformed person
Section 46(8) of Act 653 lists the offences considered to be serious offences and these
includes murder, rape, defilement, indecent assault, robbery with aggravated
circumstances, drug offences and offences related to firearms and the punishment for
such offences is to detain such an offender at a Correctional Center. Section 46(1) (d) of
Act 653 provides that “ … the period of detention shall not exceed three (3) years for a
seriousoffence.
The evidence on record shows that the offence committed by the Juvenile herein falls
within the offences considered as a serious offence per Act 653. That the Juvenile needs
reformationgiven his delinquent behaviorand his attitude during proceedings.
Sentencing
Pursuant to Section 44, 45 and 46 0f Act 653, the Juvenile is hereby committed to the
Senior Correctional Centre for a period of thirty six (36) months. The Juvenile’s family
should pay for the medical expenses incurred by the victim’s parents. The family shall
also contribute an amount of GH500 monthly towards the upkeep of the Juvenile at the
correctional centre.The Victimshould also be given psychological counseling.
SGD
………………………………………..
H/W SANDRA XORLALI LAVISON
IAGREE IAGREE
………………………………….. ………………………….……
ELLENWHITE OPOKU SOLOMONK. AMANING
Similar Cases
S v Sheers (B7/42/2024) [2024] GHADC 744 (16 December 2024)
District Court of Ghana72% similar
REPUBLIC VRS. MUMUNI AND OTHERS (CCD/CC1/10/24) [2024] GHACC 343 (19 December 2024)
Circuit Court of Ghana72% similar
The Republic v Gyameah (B4/10/2024) [2024] GHADC 802 (31 October 2024)
District Court of Ghana70% similar
REPUBLIC VRS. NAJA (BIND/9/2015) [2024] GHAHC 265 (21 May 2024)
High Court of Ghana70% similar
Republic v Basit and Another (D2/029/24) [2024] GHACC 415 (12 December 2024)
Circuit Court of Ghana70% similar