Case Law[2014] KEIC 725Kenya
Kenya Chemical and Allied Workers Union v Kenya Tanning Extracts Company Limited (Cause 695(N) of 2009) [2014] KEIC 725 (KLR) (17 January 2014) (Ruling)
Industrial Court of Kenya
Judgment
Kenya Chemical and Allied Workers Union v Kenya Tanning Extracts Company Limited (Cause 695(N) of 2009) [2014] KEIC 725 (KLR) (17 January 2014) (Ruling)
Kenya Chemical And Allied Workers Union v Kenya Tanning Extracts Company Limited [2014] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2014] KEIC 725 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Industrial Court at Nairobi
Cause 695(N) of 2009
Nzioki wa Makau, J
January 17, 2014
Between
Kenya Chemical And Allied Workers Union
Claimant
and
Kenya Tanning Extracts Company Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1.The Claimant herein had filed suit against the Respondent on behalf of its members and a Consent judgment entered on 15th May 2012 before the predecessor of this Court Hon. Kosgey J. The consent was in the following terms:-1.The Union member’s terminal dues be paid on or before 30th June 2012.2.The parties representatives to compute the dues of each grievant to due date of payment.3.Mention on 10th July 2012 at 10 a.m.
2.In Court were Mr. Were D. Ogutu for the Claimant and Mr. George Masese Advocate for the Respondent. They both appended their signatures to this consent. The matter was mentioned on 10th July 2012 before Judge Kosgey and the case was to be mentioned further on 10th August 2012. I together with my 11 colleagues were sworn in as Judges on 12th July 2012 but the case was not mentioned before any of the judges until 22nd October 2012 when the matter appeared before me. Subsequently, the matter came up and Mr. Mueke appeared and stated that the parties had agreed to settle but the Respondent had consequently approached some grievants selectively and paid them some dues leaving a balance.
3.As the consent was not set aside and granted that the dispute is at the point of computation of dues, it would be inappropriate to make further orders save for orders to ensure compliance with the decision in the case. In the premises, the Respondent and the Claimant are to comply with limb 2 of the Consent Judgment and revert to Court with the figures on 17th March 2014. If any payments have been made the same must be reflected in the computations to be filed jointly by the parties.
4.Mention on 17th March 2014 for further directions.
5.It is so ordered.
**DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 17 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014****NZIOKI WA MAKAU****JUDGE**
Similar Cases
Kenya Chemical & Allied Workers Union v Packaging Manufacturers [1976] Ltd (Cause 130 of 2012) [2014] KEIC 91 (KLR) (5 December 2014) (Ruling)
[2014] KEIC 91Industrial Court of Kenya85% similar
Kenya Chemical & Allied Workers’ Union v Associated Battery Manufactures (E.A.)Ltd (Cause 84 of 2002) [2003] KEIC 28 (KLR) (3 July 2003) (Award)
[2003] KEIC 28Industrial Court of Kenya84% similar
Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Unilever Tea (K) Ltd (Cause 923 of 2012) [2012] KEIC 25 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (25 September 2012) (Ruling)
[2012] KEIC 25Industrial Court of Kenya83% similar
Kenya Chemical & Allied Workers Union v Bamburi Special Products (Cause 1180 of 2011) [2012] KEIC 16 (KLR) (30 July 2012) (Judgment)
[2012] KEIC 16Industrial Court of Kenya83% similar
Kenya Union of Commecial Food & Allied Workers v Keroche Industries Ltd & 2 others (Cause 772 of 2010) [2013] KEIC 564 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (17 December 2013) (Ruling)
[2013] KEIC 564Industrial Court of Kenya82% similar