africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2013] KEIC 523Kenya

Mutua v Awanad Enterprises Limited (Cause 100 of 2012) [2013] KEIC 523 (KLR) (8 February 2013) (Ruling)

Industrial Court of Kenya

Judgment

Mutua v Awanad Enterprises Limited (Cause 100 of 2012) [2013] KEIC 523 (KLR) (8 February 2013) (Ruling) DAVID MAKAU MUTUA V AWANAD ENTERPRISES LIMITED[2013]eKLR Neutral citation: [2013] KEIC 523 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the Industrial Court at Nairobi Cause 100 of 2012 ON Makau, J February 8, 2013 Between David Makau Mutua Claimant and Awanad Enterprises Limited Respondent Ruling 1.The applicant has brought an application by way of the exparte originating summons dated 24.9.2012. He seeks this court leave to file suit out of time to recover damages for work related injury. 2.The application is supported by the applicant's own affidavit sworn on the same date appearing on the summons. 3.The application came up for hearing on 14.12.2012 when Madam Sudi appeared for the applicant. The court directed the said Counsel to file written submissions on or before 21.12.2012 to enable the court to make a ruling on 8.2.2013. The submissions were never filed but the court nevertheless proceeded to make this ruling based on the application and the documents on record. 4.The only issue I will now deal with is whether application is brought before the right court. The answer is negative with respect to Gazette Notice No. 9243 of 5th August 2011 by which the Chief Justice in exercise of power donated under the section 16(2) of the Labour Institution Act (repealed) appointed magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above to determine all disputes related to work injury benefits. 5.The said position still obtains by dint of section 32 of the industrial court Act 2011. 6.Consequently, it is my finding that the summons before me ought to have been filed before a magistrate's court of the rank of senior resident and above. It follows therefore that this file shall be transferred to the senior resident magistrate's court of Mombasa for determination of the Summons dated 24.9.2012.Orders accordingly. **SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED ON THE 8 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013.****ONESMUS N. MAKAU****JUDGE**

Similar Cases

Mwaure & Mwaure Waihiga & Co & another v Mutinda (Cause E021 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 331 (KLR) (6 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEELRC 331Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya80% similar
Mariera v Awanad Enterprises Ltd (Cause 191 of 2013) [2014] KEIC 861 (KLR) (6 June 2014) (Judgment)
[2014] KEIC 861Industrial Court of Kenya79% similar
Muli v Ezeetec Ltd (Cause 1224 of 2012) [2014] KEIC 852 (KLR) (19 March 2014) (Ruling)
[2014] KEIC 852Industrial Court of Kenya78% similar
Muthee v Bayer East Africa Limited & another (Cause 520 of 2011) [2012] KEIC 20 (KLR) (30 July 2012) (Ruling)
[2012] KEIC 20Industrial Court of Kenya78% similar
Mwambisi v Anwarali & Brothers Limited (Cause 15 of 2013) [2013] KEIC 631 (KLR) (8 July 2013) (Judgment)
[2013] KEIC 631Industrial Court of Kenya78% similar

Discussion