africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2012] KEELRC 221Kenya

JOHN MWANIKI V G4S SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED [2012] KEELRC 221 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya

Judgment

JOHN MWANIKI V G4S SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED [2012] KEELRC 221 (KLR) JOHN MWANIKI V G4S SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED[2012]eKLR Neutral citation: [2012] KEIC 10 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the Industrial Court at Nairobi Cause 1139 of 2012 ON Makau, J October 26, 2012 Between John Mwaniki Claimant and G4S Security Services Limited Respondent 1.The Respondent has filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection (P.O.) against the claimant’s suit. The grounds upon which the Preliminary Objection stands are:-(a)The claim is time barred under Section 90 of the [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11).(b)The Claimant lacks capacity to sue on the dispute before the Court.(c)The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a time barred suit. 2.The Preliminary Objection was argued ex-parte on 1/10/12 after the court was satisfied that the claimant was aware of the hearing date which had been fixed by consent. 3.The Respondent submitted that the suit was filed on 4-7-12 seeking remedy for unlawful termination. That the claim shows that the termination occurred on 18-7-2008. That Section 90 of the [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11) restricts time to file claims of that [Employment Act](/akn/ke/act/2007/11) restricts time to file claims of that nature to three (3) years. Consequently, the present claim should have been filed latest by 17-7-2011. 4.I have carefully perused the claim and all the supporting documents and also the submissions advanced by the Respondent. I did not see any leave order enlarging the time within which to file the suit before me. 5.Consequently, I allow the Preliminary Objection and strike out the claim with no order as to costs. **DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 26 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012.****ONESMUS MAKAU****JUDGE**

Similar Cases

Mburu & 94 others (Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of 89 others) v Kenatco Taxis Limited (Cause 1524 of 2011) [2014] KEIC 120 (KLR) (19 March 2014) (Ruling)
[2014] KEIC 120Industrial Court of Kenya72% similar
Ojiambo v Captain Hawk Security Ltd (Cause E312 of 2021) [2025] KEMC 268 (KLR) (11 November 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEMC 268Magistrate Court of Kenya70% similar
Kioko v Kithumbi & another (Civil Case E151 of 2021) [2025] KEMC 235 (KLR) (15 September 2025) (Judgment)
[2025] KEMC 235Magistrate Court of Kenya69% similar
Settim & another v National Social Security Fund the Board of Trustees (Cause 204 of 2011) [2014] KEIC 833 (KLR) (9 July 2014) (Ruling)
[2014] KEIC 833Industrial Court of Kenya69% similar
Mwangi v Muhuhi & another (Civil Suit E9 of 2024) [2024] KEMC 141 (KLR) (30 July 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KEMC 141Magistrate Court of Kenya69% similar

Discussion