Case Law[2016] KEKC 35Kenya
In re Estate of Khamis Jagina (Deceased) (Succession Cause 236 of 2009) [2016] KEKC 35 (KLR) (5 May 2016) (Ruling)
Kadhi's Court of Kenya
Judgment
In re Estate of Khamis Jagina (Deceased) (Succession Cause 236 of 2009) [2016] KEKC 35 (KLR) (5 May 2016) (Ruling)
In re Estate of Khamis Jagina [2016] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2016] KEKC 35 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Kadhis Court at Mombasa
Succession Cause 236 of 2009
AH Athman, PK
May 5, 2016
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KHAMIS JAGINA (DECEASED)
Between
Ali Hamisi Kinganga
Petitioner
and
Muhamad Hamisi Jagina
Respondent
Ruling
1.This is a Notice of motion dated February 8, 2016 for orders for leave for the substitution of the petitioner with Momo Hathani Mbarak alias Momo Hamisi Jagina.
2.The applicant deponed that the petitioner is her brother and had passed way on August 25, 2015 at Mombasa. Death certificate was annexed to the application and the substitution is necessary to finalize determination of the matter.
3.The respondent opposes the application. He filed grounds of opposition dated March 9, 2016. He states the applicant is not a beneficiary of the estate and not a sister of Ali Hamisi Jagina, the deceased petitioner.
4.The matter was disposed of by way of written submissions. Counsel of parties reiterated their positions in the applications and reply thereto.
5.Momo Hamisi Jagina is listed as one of the heirs of the estate in this matter. In his reply to the petition the respondent at para 3 contested her entitlement to inherit the estate as a legal heir. He claimed the deceased had denounced her. The matter was settled by consent dated August 14, 2013. Parties were silent on the heirs in that consent adopted by court. They agreed on all assets of the estate save for two properties which they were to address later.
6.The applicant is a prima facie beneficiary of the estate. The respondent disputes this fact but his statement alludes she was recognized but later denounced by the deceased. This is all the more reason why she must be allowed to defend her entitlement.
7.The application is granted as prayed. Orders accordingly.
**DATED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA ON 5TH MAY 2016****ABDULHALIM H. ATHMAN****PRINCIPAL KADHI****In the presence of:** Mr. Yusuf K. Abdulrahman, Court AssistantMr. Mazrui for applicantMr. Mwawasi for respondent
Similar Cases
In re Estate of Abdulhussein Awadh (Deceased) (Succession Cause 96 of 2010) [2016] KEKC 33 (KLR) (5 May 2016) (Ruling)
[2016] KEKC 33Kadhi's Court of Kenya82% similar
In re Estate of Mohamed Karama (Deceased) (Succession Cause 167 of 2015) [2024] KEKC 10 (KLR) (2 May 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KEKC 10Kadhi's Court of Kenya82% similar
In re Estate of IOI (Deceased) (Succession Cause 7 of 2019) [2019] KEKC 35 (KLR) (29 March 2019) (Ruling)
[2019] KEKC 35Kadhi's Court of Kenya82% similar
In re Estate of Hassan Abdalla Awale (Deceased) (Succession Cause E378 of 2021) [2024] KEKC 27 (KLR) (13 December 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KEKC 27Kadhi's Court of Kenya81% similar
In re Estate of Dilawar Khan & Hava Bhai Khan (Deceased) (Succession Cause E012 of 2020) [2022] KEKC 159 (KLR) (10 November 2022) (Judgment)
[2022] KEKC 159Kadhi's Court of Kenya80% similar