Case Law[2024] KEMC 85Kenya
Republic v Ajuoga (Criminal Case E2488 of 2024) [2024] KEMC 85 (KLR) (10 December 2024) (Ruling)
Magistrate Court of Kenya
Judgment
Republic v Ajuoga (Criminal Case E2488 of 2024) [2024] KEMC 85 (KLR) (10 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEMC 85 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Nakuru Law Courts
Criminal Case E2488 of 2024
PA Ndege, SPM
December 10, 2024
Between
Republic
Prosecution
and
Samwel Odoyo Ajuoga
Accused
Ruling
1.This ruling is a continuation of my earlier ruling dated 21st November 2024 on the application by the prosecution for compelling reason to deny accused person herein bond/bail. One prominent compelling reason was that the accused person herein is a flight risk as he has no known place of abode and that chances of him jumping bail are high.
2.This court set out the principles for grant and or denial of bail/bond in my earlier ruling and it is therefore not necessary to repeat them herein.
3.This court however found the averments by the prosecution to be unchallenged but cautiously and diligently called for a pre-bail report form the probation department to verify the said averments.
4.In a comprehensive report dated 28th November 2024, the probation officer confirmed that the accused person herein is indeed a flight risk. That his place of abode is unknown. Thus the accused is highly likely not to stand his trial if released on bail; hence a compelling reason as held in [S v Nyaruviro & another](https://zimlii.org/akn/zw/judgment/zwbhc/2017/262/eng@2017-08-31); (HB 262 - 17) HCB 12-17, XREF CRB 1454 A-B -17 (2017) ZWBHC 262; and the [Kenya Judiciary’s bail and bond policy guidelines](http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Bail_and_Bond_Policy_Guidelines.pdf) March 2015 at paragraph 25(a).
5.Accused person has raised no issue with the probation officer’s report. He only insisted on being granted cash bail which is even more risky than a surety bond, especially to an accused person whose place of abode is unknown.
6.I thus find a compelling reason to deny the accused person whose bond/bail and he shall remain in remand custody, unless another exceptional or unusual circumstances arises, which set themselves apart from the ones already canvassed in the application for refusal of bond/bail herein.
**DATED SIGNED & DELIVERED AT NAKURU IN OPEN COURT THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024.**In the presence of:-Janet C/interpreterSmith present for prosecutionAccused person present**HON. A. NDEGE - SPM****Court** \- hearing on 28th May 2025 and mention on 24th December before the duty court.**HON. A. NDEGE - SPM**
Similar Cases
Republic v Amusavi (Criminal Case 1186 of 2023) [2025] KEMC 269 (KLR) (11 November 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEMC 269Magistrate Court of Kenya83% similar
Republic v Wanjiku & another (Criminal Case E901 of 2025) [2025] KEMC 140 (KLR) (12 June 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEMC 140Magistrate Court of Kenya82% similar
Republic v JO (Traffic Case E1899 of 2024) [2025] KEMC 25 (KLR) (11 February 2025) (Ruling)
[2025] KEMC 25Magistrate Court of Kenya81% similar
Republic v Adede (Criminal Case E026 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 1415 (KLR) (13 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1415High Court of Kenya80% similar
Republic v Oloo & 2 others (Criminal Case E025 of 2022) [2024] KEMC 64 (KLR) (29 November 2024) (Ruling)
[2024] KEMC 64Magistrate Court of Kenya80% similar