Case LawAfrican Union / Regional Courts
INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION TO PREVENT AND PUNISH TORTURE
Judgment
INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION TO PREVENT AND PUNISH TORTURE
The American States signatory to the present Convention,
Aware of the provision of the American Convention on Human Rights that no one
shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment or
treatment;
Reaffirming that all acts of torture or any other cruel, inhuman, or degrading
treatment or punishment constitute an offense against human dignity and a
denial of the principles set forth in the Charter of the Organization of American
States and in the Charter of the United Nations and are violations of the
fundamental human rights and freedoms proclaimed in the American Declaration
of the Rights and Duties of Man and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
Noting that, in order for the pertinent rules contained in the aforementioned
global and regional instruments to take effect, it is necessary to draft an Inter-
American Convention that prevents and punishes torture;
Reaffirming their purpose of consolidating in this hemisphere the conditions that
make for recognition of and respect for the inherent dignity of man, and ensure
the full exercise of his fundamental rights and freedoms,
Have agreed upon the following:
Article 1
The State Parties undertake to prevent and punish torture in accordance with the
terms of this Convention.
Article 2
For the purposes of this Convention, torture shall be understood to be any act
intentionally performed whereby physical or mental pain or suffering is inflicted
on a person for purposes of criminal investigation, as a means of intimidation, as
personal punishment, as a preventive measure, as a penalty, or for any other
purpose. Torture shall also be understood to be the use of methods upon a
person intended to obliterate the personality of the victim or to diminish his
physical or mental capacities, even if they do not cause physical pain or mental
anguish.
The concept of torture shall not include physical or mental pain or suffering that
is inherent in or solely the consequence of lawful measures, provided that they
do not include the performance of the acts or use of the methods referred to in
this article.
Article 3
The following shall be held guilty of the crime of torture:
a. A public servant or employee who acting in that capacity
orders, instigates or induces the use of torture, or who directly
commits it or who, being able to prevent it, fails to do so.
b. A person who at the instigation of a public servant or
employee mentioned in subparagraph (a) orders, instigates or
induces the use of torture, directly commits it or is an
accomplice thereto.
Article 4
The fact of having acted under orders of a superior shall not provide exemption
from the corresponding criminal liability.
Article 5
The existence of circumstances such as a state of war, threat of war, state of
siege or of emergency, domestic disturbance or strife, suspension of
constitutional guarantees, domestic political instability, or other public
emergencies or disasters shall not be invoked or admitted as justification for the
crime of torture.
Neither the dangerous character of the detainee or prisoner, nor the lack of
security of the prison establishment or penitentiary shall justify torture.
Article 6
In accordance with the terms of Article 1, the States Parties shall take effective
measures to prevent and punish torture within their jurisdiction.
The States Parties shall ensure that all acts of torture and attempts to commit
torture are offenses under their criminal law and shall make such acts punishable
by severe penalties that take into account their serious nature.
The States Parties likewise shall take effective measures to prevent and punish
other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment within their
jurisdiction.
Article 7
The States Parties shall take measures so that, in the training of police officers
and other public officials responsible for the custody of persons temporarily or
definitively deprived of their freedom, special emphasis shall be put on the
prohibition of the use of torture in interrogation, detention, or arrest.
The States Parties likewise shall take similar measures to prevent other cruel,
inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 8
The States Parties shall guarantee that any person making an accusation of
having been subjected to torture within their jurisdiction shall have the right to
an impartial examination of his case.
Likewise, if there is an accusation or well-grounded reason to believe that an act
of torture has been committed within their jurisdiction, the States Parties shall
guarantee that their respective authorities will proceed properly and immediately
to conduct an investigation into the case and to initiate, whenever appropriate,
the corresponding criminal process.
After all the domestic legal procedures of the respective State and the
corresponding appeals have been exhausted, the case may be submitted to the
international fora whose competence has been recognized by that State.
Article 9
The States Parties undertake to incorporate into their national laws regulations
guaranteeing suitable compensation for victims of torture.
None of the provisions of this article shall affect the right to receive
compensation that the victim or other persons may have by virtue of existing
national legislation.
Article 10
No statement that is verified as having been obtained through torture shall be
admissible as evidence in a legal proceeding, except in a legal action taken
against a person or persons accused of having elicited it through acts of torture,
and only as evidence that the accused obtained such statement by such means.
Article 11
The States Parties shall take the necessary steps to extradite anyone accused of
having committed the crime of torture or sentenced for commission of that
crime, in accordance with their respective national laws on extradition and their
international commitments on this matter.
Article 12
Every State Party shall take the necessary measures to establish its jurisdiction
over the crime described in this Convention in the following cases:
a. When torture has been committed within its jurisdiction;
b. When the alleged criminal is a national of that State; or
c. When the victim is a national of that State and it so deems
appropriate.
Every State Party shall also take the necessary measures to establish its
jurisdiction over the crime described in this Convention when the alleged criminal
is within the area under its jurisdiction and it is not appropriate to extradite him
in accordance with Article 11.
This Convention does not exclude criminal jurisdiction exercised in accordance
with domestic law.
Article 13
The crime referred to in Article 2 shall be deemed to be included among the
extraditable crimes in every extradition treaty entered into between States
Parties. The States Parties undertake to include the crime of torture as an
extraditable offence in every extradition treaty to be concluded between them.
Every State Party that makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty
may, if it receives a request for extradition from another State Party with which it
has no extradition treaty, consider this Convention as the legal basis for
extradition in respect of the crime of torture. Extradition shall be subject to the
other conditions that may be required by the law of the requested State.
States Parties which do not make extradition conditional on the existence of a
treaty shall recognize such crimes as extraditable offences between themselves,
subject to the conditions required by the law of the requested State.
Extradition shall not be granted nor shall the person sought be returned when
there are grounds to believe that his life is in danger, that he will be subjected to
torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, or that he will be tried by
special or ad hoc courts in the requesting State.
Article 14
When a State Party does not grant the extradition, the case shall be submitted to
its competent authorities as if the crime had been committed within its
jurisdiction, for the purposes of investigation, and when appropriate, for criminal
action, in accordance with its national law. Any decision adopted by these
authorities shall be communicated to the State that has requested the
extradition.
Article 15
No provision of this Convention may be interpreted as limiting the right of
asylum, when appropriate, nor as altering the obligations of the States Parties in
the matter of extradition.
Article 16
This Convention shall not limit the provisions of the American Convention on
Human Rights, other conventions on the subject, or the Statutes of the Inter-
American Commission on Human Rights, with respect to the crime of torture.
Article 17
The States Parties undertake to inform the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights of any legislative, judicial, administrative, or other measures they
adopt in application of this Convention.
In keeping with its duties and responsibilities, the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights will endeavor in its annual report to analyze the existing situation
in the member states of the Organization of American States in regard to the
prevention and elimination of torture.
Article 18
This Convention is open to signature by the member states of the Organization
of American States.
Article 19
This Convention is subject to ratification. The instruments of ratification shall be
deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.
Article 20
This Convention is open to accession by any other American state. The
instruments of accession shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the
Organization of American States.
Article 21
The States Parties may, at the time of approval, signature, ratification, or
accession, make reservations to this Convention, provided that such reservations
are not incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and concern
one or more specific provisions.
Article 22
This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following the date on
which the second instrument of ratification is deposited. For each State ratifying
or acceding to the Convention after the second instrument of ratification has
been deposited, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day
following the date on which that State deposits its instrument of ratification or
accession.
Article 23
This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but may be denounced by any
State Party. The instrument of denunciation shall be deposited with the General
Secretariat of the Organization of American States. After one year from the date
of deposit of the instrument of denunciation, this Convention shall cease to be in
effect for the denouncing State but shall remain in force for the remaining States
Parties.
Article 24
The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese, and
Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General
Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which shall send a certified
copy to the Secretariat of the United Nations for registration and publication, in
accordance with the provisions of Article 102 of the United Nations Charter. The
General Secretariat of the Organization of American States shall notify the
member states of the Organization and the States that have acceded to the
Convention of signatures and of deposits of instruments of ratification, accession,
and denunciation, as well as reservations, if any.
Similar Cases
S v Chokuramba Justice For Children’s Trust Intervening As Amicus Curiae Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights Intervening As Amicus Curiae (CCZ 10 of 2019; Constitutional Application CCZ 29 of 2015) [2019] ZWCC 10 (3 April 2019)
[2019] ZWCC 10Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe67% similar
Smith and Others v Minister Of Justice And Correctional Services (21639/2015) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1127 (31 August 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1127High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)65% similar
Masangano v Attorney General & Ors. (15 of 2007) [2009] MWSC 31 (8 November 2009)
[2009] MWSC 31Supreme Court of Appeal of Malawi65% similar
Scalabrini Centre of Cape Town and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (5441/20) [2023] ZAWCHC 28; [2023] 2 All SA 256 (WCC); 2023 (4) SA 249 (WCC) (13 February 2023)
[2023] ZAWCHC 28High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division)65% similar
232/99 John D. Ouko v Kenya
64% similar