Busonya & 2 Ors v Giruli [2018] UGSC 50 (28 September 2018)

# Busonya & 2 Ors v Giruli [2018] UGSC 50 (28 September 2018) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Busonya+%26+2+Ors+v+Giruli+%5B2018%5D+UGSC+50+%2828+September+2018%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2018%2F50%2Feng%402018-09-28) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Busonya+%26+2+Ors+v+Giruli+%5B2018%5D+UGSC+50+%2828+September+2018%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2018%2F50%2Feng%402018-09-28) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Busonya%20&%202%20Ors%20v%20Giruli%20\[2018\]%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28) __Save [ Download PDF (1.2 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (1.2 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Busonya & 2 Ors v Giruli [2018] UGSC 50 (28 September 2018) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Busonya & 2 Ors v Giruli [2018] UGSC 50 (28 September 2018) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2018] UGSC 50 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judgment date 28 September 2018 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Civil Defences|Affidavits Read full summary ###### Case summary The court held that the failure of the commissioner for oaths to seal and identify the annexures doesn’t ipso facto make the affidavit fatally defective and inadmissible. That as it was a fact on record that the affidavit had complied with the rules, it shouldn’t have been struck altogether. That in the circumstances, the justice of the case required the determination of the allegation of fraud and hence the retrial wasn’t erroneous. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 1.2 MB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/50/eng@2018-09-28/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >