Birete Sarah v Uganda [2017] UGSC 27 (15 June 2017)

# Birete Sarah v Uganda [2017] UGSC 27 (15 June 2017) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Birete+Sarah+v+Uganda+%5B2017%5D+UGSC+27+%2815+June+2017%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2017%2F27%2Feng%402017-06-15) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Birete+Sarah+v+Uganda+%5B2017%5D+UGSC+27+%2815+June+2017%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2017%2F27%2Feng%402017-06-15) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Birete%20Sarah%20v%20Uganda%20\[2017\]%20UGSC%2027%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15) [ Download RTF (164.0 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15/source.pdf) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download RTF (164.0 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15/source) * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2017/27/eng@2017-06-15/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Birete Sarah v Uganda [2017] UGSC 27 (15 June 2017) Copy citation * __Document detail * __Related documents * __Citations 1 / - Citation Birete Sarah v Uganda [2017] UGSC 27 (15 June 2017) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2017] UGSC 27 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judges [Nshimye, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Nshimye%2C%20JSC) Judgment date 15 June 2017 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law Read full summary __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content 3. **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA** **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA** 10 15 20 AT KAMPALA _**(CORAM:A**_ _**.**__**S**_ _**.**__**NSHIMYE JSC.)**_ **CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO****.****04 OF 2016** **BETWEEN** **B** **IRETE SARAH···****·****········****·****····****·****··****··****·····****APPLICANT** .......................................... **VERSUS** UGANDA **-RESPONDENT** ......................................................... 25 _**RULING OF JUSTICE**_ _**N**_ _**SHIM**_ _**YE**_ _**.JS**_**C:** This is an application by way of Notice of Motion brought under article 23 (b) (a) of [the Constitution](/akn/ug/act/statute/1995/constitution), and rules 42 , __ and 43 of the Judicature (Supreme Court) Rules 30 Directions for the release of the applicant on bail pending the disposal of her appeal. The application is supported by both the original affidavit and a subsequent one in rejoinder. 35 In brief she deponed that she is an appellant in this Court since 21st April 2016. She was first convicted by the Anti- _ , , ( . ...' I , _"_ ~ __ Corruption 'Court' and was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on each of the two counts of Abuse of office _CIS_(1) and embezzlement _CIS_ 14 (a) (iii) of the Anti Corruption Act 2009. She was also ordered to refund the embezzled USD 70,000. 10 She appealed to the Court of Appeal which allowed her appeal against conviction and sentence on the offence of Abuse of office. 15 Her conviction and sentence on the second count of embezzlement was upheld, hence her appeal and this application to this court. She deponed further that she applied to be supplied with a copy of proceedings which has not been availed by the Court of Appeal. 20 She is a single mother of two infant sons and guardian of an orphaned child. The infant children are 8-10 years while the dependent girl child is 4 years. _25_ _**Submission by Counsel/or the applicant:**_ Her learned Counsel Mr. Kanduho read and highlighted paragraphs 2,3,4,6 and 7 of the applicant's affidavit In support relating to the character of the applicant. 2 " , ',',I ' j I I' ':5 ';. That during the trial at the High Court and on appeal to the Court of Appeal, she was released on bail and she abided by all the bail terms which were set by the said two Courts. 10 Counsel submitted that, In the courts below, she deposited a certificate of title on which her residential house is situated and that if the court was inclined to ask for another title, her cousin sister who is an Ag. Assistant DPP and Potential Surety was ready to give her Powers of 15 Attorney to deposit her title. Learned counsel Kanduho further submitted that the appeal was not frivolous and had a reasonable chance of success. However, Counsel expressed fear that there was 20 a high possibility of delay in hearing the appeal because since the applicant applied for proceedings they have not been availed by the Court of Appeal. He contended that in the likely event of the appeal being 25 allowed after delay, the applicant would have to her detriment served a substantial part of her sentence. Lastly Counsel pointed out that the offence for which the applicant was convicted did not involve personal violence. He presented 4 sureties namely: 1 Major Okwiri Lwabwoni 48 years former MP in the 6th Parliament. Retired army officer resident of Muyenga B division. His particulars are on the file. He is a colleague of 10 the applicant at work _"__Center_ _**for Constitutional**_ _**Governance" .**_ 2 Mr. Beyanga Joseph resident of Nsansa LCI Kira Municipality Wakiso. He works with Monitor publications, 15 he is a brother to the applicant and his particulars are on the court file. 3 Nduhukire Naume a resident of Katooke BV, she is the employee of Reserve Protection Services Ltd. 20 childhood friend of the applicant. She is 4 Caroline Nabasa Ag. Assistant DPP, resident of Kiira Division, Kiira town council Division, cousin sister of the applicant. She executed powers of attorney authorizing the 25 applicant to deposit her land title comprised in Mengo, Kyadondo, Block 210 plot 1920 if Court so ordered. 4 3. ' I ( •• •• , .: I " \, , I ~ , I _**Submission**_ _'__in_ _'__**reply by counse1 for the respondent:**_ Marion Achio SSA Counsel for the respondent opposed the application and relied on the affidavit of Bisamunyu David a Senior State Attorney in the Directorate of Public Prosecutions. 10 She submitted that the application had been bought under a wrong law, namely article 23 (b) (a). This article does not provide for bail pending appeal. 15 She submitted further that the applicant's appeal being a second and final appeal, section 2 of Judicature Act provides that the appeal can only be based on a point of law. 20 The Learned Senior State Attorney wondered why no proposed memorandum of appeal was attached to guide Court on what ground the appeal is based. In her view therefore, the appeal has no chance of success. 25 She argued that contents of paragraph 4 of the affidavit rejoinder G-d are not matter of law. They are issues of evaluation of evidence. According to her, improper evaluation of evidence is not a point of law. " • I _.__tJ_ With regard to delay, she submitted that, there was no evidence of likely delay because the court was well staffed with Justices. 10 While relying on the authority of _**Arvind Patel Vs Uganda**_ _**Misc Appl**_ _**i**_ _**cation No**_ _**.**__**2003**_ filed by counsel for the applicant, she distinguished it from the one before this court on the ground that there was substantive delay in Arvind Patel which is not the case in the applicant case. 15 The learned Attorney asked the court to ignore the submission of counsel for the applicant that she abided by the bail conditions set by the lower courts as a ground that the applicant should be trusted against the 20 absconding. That circumstances have changed, she was then during at the trial innocent, but now she is a convict and her conviction on the charge of embezzlement was upheld by 25 the Court of Appeal. Counsel Achio referred to the respondent's affidavit paragraph 11 and contended that even if embezzlement is \- , , _r_ '" _f_ _-__f_ ~', I **"**.' _r_ _•_ " _J_ _'_ • I : '5· :' not of violent in nature, financial crimes are peculiar with \- - far reaching implication. She prayed to court to dismiss the application. But in the event that court is inclined to grant the application, 10 stringent terms should be imposed like depositing a land title in the applicant's names with express authority to dispose of the property in the event of jumping bail and in addition deposit cash of 70,000 USD. _1_ _5_ _**Submiss**_ _**i**_ _**on**_**in** _**rejo**_ _**i**_ _**nder by**_ _Counsel for_ _**the applicant:**_ In rejoinder counsel for the applicant conceded that article 23 (b) (a) of [the Constitution](/akn/ug/act/statute/1995/constitution) was quoted in Motion in error but the court is called to exercise substantial justice. Whether the proposed appeal discloses a point of law, 20 counsel contended that the question as to what the applicant did amounts to embezzlement is a point of law to be decided by this court. Counsel referred court to paragraph 4 (b) affidavits of the 25 applicant in rejoinder that the money in question was used by the Permanent Secretary and not the applicant which is a question of law as to whether that was embezzlement. 7 **'****:****..****f** \ \- - -_ , " '. _I_ _I_ , '. Counsel cited the case of _**AZenyo Marks Vs Uganda Misc.**_ _**Application No**_ _**.**_**05** _**of 2015**_ in which my sister Faith Mwondha JSC cited with approval the case of Arvind Patel _(Supra)._ He prayed that the court do consider the application with compassion. On how soon the appeal can 10 be heard, Counsel contended that will depend on how soon the Court of Appeal can be ready to make the proceedings available to the applicant. With regard to the proposal by counsel for the respondent 15 that in the event the applicant is granted bail, she should deposit cash of USD 70,000, Counsel submitted that the purposed of bail would be defeated. He reiterated his early prayer that the applicant be granted bail. _2_ _0_ _**DECISION**_ _**:**_ Upon reading the affidavits in support of the application and that of the respondent together with supporting documentary evidence and authorities attached thereto and upon hearing and considering submissions of both 25 Counsel, the following are my findings and decision. I uphold the submission of counsel for the respondent that article 23 (b) (a) under which the application was brought is inapplicable to this bail application and IS 8 \- ., ' _1_**.****,****.****'** irrelevant. Un 'seriousness and profession negligence of this nature especially when it is portrayed by senior counsel in the Highest Court of the land is unacceptable and should not be repeated. 10 The correct law that should have been quoted IS section 40 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, professional error of Counsel should not be visited on the applicant who is yearning for substantive 15 justice. Her application is clear that she wants to be released on bail pending her appeal on grounds she has deponed to and the court is alive of the correct provision of the law under which her application should have been brought. 20 Errors of counsel notwithstanding, I will invoke the provision of article 126 of [the Constitution](/akn/ug/act/statute/1995/constitution) which provides: _"__That substantive justice shall be administered_ _without undue regard to_ _technicalities"_ 25 The principles which guide court in applications of this nature, were stated in the case Arvind Patel (Supra) which were considered and reproduced in the 2nd applicant's authority of _**Alenyo Marks Vs Uganda**_(Supra) decided by 9 3. •. my learned (sister Faith Mwondha JSC on the 17th February 2016 I find, having considered the objection of Counsel for the respondent that the applicant proved that: 10 1\. It is not clear when her appeal is likely to be heard, 2. Having succeeded by 50% in her appeal in Court of Appeal, there was no compelling evidence to tilt her 15 belief that even the remaining leg of her appeal would succeed in this court. 3.Judging from the way she conducted herself when she was released on bail in the High Court and in the 20 Court of Appeal I have no reason to believe that she could flee. 4. Her sureties are substantial and are approved and relied upon for her return to court until her appeal is heard and disposed of. 25 Her application therefore succeeds _(a) She will be released on bail,__if_ _she executes a bail_ _bond of Shs._ 700 _million (not cash)._ _(b) Deposit the original land title in the names of her_ 30 _cousin sister the_ _4_ _th_ _surety who_ 10 _agreed_ to _give her_ ,. .. " , ,- .•..• ,,: ~ ') .5 ( _Powers_ _'__of Attorney to do_ so _(Mengo Kyandondo_ _Block_ 210 _Plot 1920)._ _(c) Each of_ 4 _sureties will execute bonds of Shs_ _250 million (not cash)._ 10 _(d) The securities the applicant deposited in the trial_ _and or the Court of Appeal should not be released_ _until the applicant's appeal_ is _disposed of_ _i._ e. _her_ _pass post and land title on which her residence_ is _15_ _situated._ The applicant 1S directed to report to the Registrar of this Court on every 15th working day of the month starting to 15th July 2016 to have her bail extended 20 until her appeal is heard and disposed of. _15th_ **Dated at Kampala this day of June 2016** 25 A.S. Nshimye **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** 11 #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one ▲ To the top >