Kuteesa v Nantumbwe & Ors [2015] UGSC 123 (21 July 2015)

# Kuteesa v Nantumbwe & Ors [2015] UGSC 123 (21 July 2015) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Kuteesa+v+Nantumbwe+%26+Ors+%5B2015%5D+UGSC+123+%2821+July+2015%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2015%2F123%2Feng%402015-07-21) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Kuteesa+v+Nantumbwe+%26+Ors+%5B2015%5D+UGSC+123+%2821+July+2015%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2015%2F123%2Feng%402015-07-21) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Kuteesa%20v%20Nantumbwe%20&%20Ors%20\[2015\]%20UGSC%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21) __Save [ Download PDF (4.8 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (4.8 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Kuteesa v Nantumbwe & Ors [2015] UGSC 123 (21 July 2015) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Kuteesa v Nantumbwe & Ors [2015] UGSC 123 (21 July 2015) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2015] UGSC 123 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judges [Katureebe, CJ](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Katureebe%2C%20CJ), [Arach-Amoko, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Arach-Amoko%2C%20JSC), [Mwondha, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Mwondha%2C%20JSC), [Mwangusya, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Mwangusya%2C%20JSC), [Tumwesigye, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Tumwesigye%2C%20JSC) Judgment date 21 July 2015 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Civil Procedure|Notice of Appeal Read full summary ###### Case summary Counsel for the applicant submitted that Notice of Appeal had been served on another Counsel who had no instructions from the applicant, thus, the Notice of Appeal was incompetent and could not be left to stand. He further contended that the interim order was tainted with illegalities and bad faith.   Counsel for the respondent opposed the application and contended that service was effective as it was made on a duly instructed counsel. He further submitted that the matter was res judicata, having been decided by the Supreme Court.   From the evidence that was adduced, it was found that the Notice of Appeal had not been served on the persons directly affected by the appeal, and it was thereby struck out. Further, it was found that the applicant failed to prove that the appeal had been brought outside time. With regard to the interim order, it was found to have been entered invalidly. Further, the court found that the respondent was liable for abuse of court of order for executing an order that had elapsed.   In the result, the application was granted with prayers sought. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 4.8 MB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2015/123/eng@2015-07-21/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >