Case Law[2005] UGSC 13Uganda
Philip Zahura v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 13 (18 July 2005)
Supreme Court of Uganda
Judgment
# Philip Zahura v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 13 (18 July 2005)
[ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Philip+Zahura+v+Uganda+%28Criminal+Appeal+16+of+2004%29+%5B2005%5D+UGSC+13+%2818+July+2005%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2005%2F13%2Feng%402005-07-18) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Philip+Zahura+v+Uganda+%28Criminal+Appeal+16+of+2004%29+%5B2005%5D+UGSC+13+%2818+July+2005%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2005%2F13%2Feng%402005-07-18) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Philip%20Zahura%20v%20Uganda%20\(Criminal%20Appeal%2016%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18)
__Save
[ Download RTF (24.0 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18/source) Toggle dropdown
* [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18/source.pdf)
Report a problem
##### Is there something wrong with this document?
Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther
What's the problem? *
Your email address *
CancelReport problem
__
* Share
* [ Download RTF (24.0 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18/source)
* [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2005/13/eng@2005-07-18/source.pdf)
* * * *
* Report a problem
__
##### Philip Zahura v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 13 (18 July 2005)
Copy citation __Save
* __Document detail
* __Related documents
* __Citations 1 / 2
Citation
Philip Zahura v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 13 (18 July 2005) Copy
Media Neutral Citation
[2005] UGSC 13 Copy
Court
[Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/)
Case number
Criminal Appeal 16 of 2004
Judges
[Oder, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Oder%2C%20JSC), [J.W.N.Tsekooko, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=J.W.N.Tsekooko%2C%20JSC), [Karokora, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Karokora%2C%20JSC), [Mulenga, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Mulenga%2C%20JSC), [Kanyeihamba, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Kanyeihamba%2C%20JSC)
Judgment date
18 July 2005
Language
English
Summary
Conviction upheld; confirmation of mandatory death sentence postponed pending resolution of constitutional appeal.
###### Flynote
* Criminal Law — Murder Appeal — Self‑defence, Provocation and Dying Declaration — Appellate review of factual and legal application
* Constitutional Law — Death Penalty — Effect of Constitutional Court decision on mandatory death sentence — Postponement of confirmation under Article 22(1) pending appeal
Read full summary
##### Unlock this feature
Sign up to save documents, read summaries and access more features.
[ Start My ULII ](/en/accounts/login/?next=%2Fen%2Faccounts%2Fsubscription%2Fcheck%3Fproduct%3DMy%2BULII%26next%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fulii.org%252Fen%252Fakn%252Fug%252Fjudgment%252Fugsc%252F2005%252F13%252Feng%25402005-07-18)
Already have an account? [Log in](/en/accounts/login/?next=%2Fen%2Faccounts%2Fsubscription%2Fcheck%3Fproduct%3DMy%2BULII%26next%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fulii.org%252Fen%252Fakn%252Fug%252Fjudgment%252Fugsc%252F2005%252F13%252Feng%25402005-07-18).
__
##### Ask AI
Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI.
__Ask AI
* * *
Skip to document content
**THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA**
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA**
**AT MENGO**
_**(CORAM: ODER, TSEKOOKO, KAROKORA, MULENGA, KANYEIHAMBA, JJ.S.C)**_
**CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2004**
**BETWEEN**
**PHILIP ZAHURA APPELLANT**
**AND**
**UGANDA RESPONDENT**
_**(Appeal arising from the judgment and decision of The Court of Appeal (Okello, Engwau, Kituinba,**__**JJ**_ _**.A.) dated 11th November, 2004 in criminal appeal no. 140 of 2002,)**_
**_JUDGMENT OF COURT_**
The appellant, Philip Zahura, was convicted for murder and sentenced to death. His appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. Hence this appeal.
The appeal to this Court was originally on the following two grounds
1. **That the Learned** _J_**ustices of Appeal did not properly consider the principles of self - defence and provocation in the instant case and as a result wrongfully confirmed the appellant's conviction.**
1. **The Learned** _J_**ustices of Appeal considered the principle of the dying declaration in isolation, thus they erred in law when they confirmed the appellant's conviction.**
Su _b_ sequently, we allowed the appellant to file a supplementary ground of appeal which was framed as follows:-
**That the Learned** _J_**ustices of the Court of Appeal erred in law and occasioned a miscarriage of justice in not giving the appellant an opportunity to be heard on the question of mitigation of sentence.**
On the first two grounds, Mr Taye _b_ wa, counsel for the appellant filed written submissions under rule 63 of the Rules of this Court and Mr. Ssemalemba, Principal State Attorney, filed written su _b_ missions in reply.
Having perused the record of proceedings and read counsel's su _b_ missions, we find no merit in the appeal. We find that the Court of Appeal correctly applied the law to the facts of this case and arrived at the correct decision. The appeal against conviction is accordingly dismissed.
On the supplementary ground of appeal, Mr. Katende, also counsel for the appellant, drew our attention to the decision of the Constitutional Court in _**Susan Kigula & Others v Attorney General, **__Constitutional Petition No. 6 of 2003_ in which that court held that it was unconstitutional to make the death penalty mandatory and ordered, inter-alia, that -
_**"The petitioners whose appeals are still pending before an appellate court -**_
1. _**Shall be afforded a hearing in mitigation.**_
1. _**The court shall exercise discretion whether or not to confirm the sentence,"**_
Counsel prayed that if we uphold the conviction, we should remit the case to the High Court with directions for that Court to hear the appellant in mitigation on sentence. Mr. Katende informed Court that the decision of the Constitutional Court in _**Susan Kigula**_ _(supra)_ is the subject of appeal to the Supreme Court and each side has filed notice of appeal.
Mr. Wamasebu, Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions, for the respondent, in reply submitted that this supplementary ground was premature in view of the pending appeal. He urged the Court to stay proceedings in all appeals where the death sentence was imposed on the basis that it was mandatory.
We have considered all the submissions on this novel point. In our view accepting the submissions of counsel for the appellant would tantamount to pre-empting the decision of the Supreme Court in the pending appeal.
While the decision of the Constitutional Court must be respected for the moment, we cannot implement it while the appeal against it is pending. At the same time, it would be imprudent to postpone all the cases in which the mandatory death sentences have been imposed. In our view, this Court shall determine the appropriate order to be made in each case to ensure that the death penalty is not carried out before the determination of the pending constitutional appeal.
In the unusual circumstances created by the decision of the Constitutional Court, we exercise our discretion and postpone confirmation of sentence in this case under Article 22(1) of [the Constitution](/akn/ug/act/statute/1995/constitution), until the determination of the pending constitutional appeal against the decision of the Constitutional Court in Constitutional Petition No. 6 of 2003.
_**Dated this 18**_ _**th**_ _**day of July, 2005.**_
**SIGNED:**
**A.H.O.ODER**
_**J**_**USTI** _**C**_**E OF SUPREME** _**C**_**OURT**
**J.W**.N. T**SEKOOKO**
_**J**_**USTI** _**C**_**E OF SUPREME** _**C**_**OURT**
**A.N. KAROKORA**
**JUSTI** _**C**_**E OF SUPREME** _**C**_**OURT**
**J.N. MULENGA**
**JUSTI** _**C**_**E OF SUPREME** _**C**_**OURT**
**G.W. KANYEIHAMBA**
**JUSTI** _**C**_**E OF SUPREME** _**C**_**OURT**
#### __Related documents
#### More documents like this one
__Suggestions generated by AI.
This feature is not currently available.
▲ To the top
>
Similar Cases
Hamuza & Others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 44 of 2001) [2004] UGSC 36 (18 May 2004)
[2004] UGSC 36Supreme Court of Uganda78% similar
Matu Elisa v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 210 of 2024) [2026] UGCA 191 (25 May 2026)
[2026] UGCA 191Court of Appeal of Uganda72% similar
Lubega v Ssinabulya & 2 Ors (Civil Appeal 4 of 2019) [2020] UGSC 34 (8 October 2020)
[2020] UGSC 34Supreme Court of Uganda69% similar
Munir Zulu v Attorney General and Chibwili (Appeal No. 23/2025; SCZ/8/11/2025) (13 March 2026)
– ZambiaLII
[2026] ZMSC 7Supreme Court of Zambia69% similar
Kule Fenahasi v Amuza Kanzolo (Civil Appeal 17 of 2024) [2026] UGHC 617 (4 June 2026)
[2026] UGHC 617High Court of Uganda67% similar