Twehamye v Uganda [2001] UGSC 12 (19 September 2001)

# Twehamye v Uganda [2001] UGSC 12 (19 September 2001) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Twehamye+v+Uganda+%5B2001%5D+UGSC+12+%2819+September+2001%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2001%2F12%2Feng%402001-09-19) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Twehamye+v+Uganda+%5B2001%5D+UGSC+12+%2819+September+2001%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2001%2F12%2Feng%402001-09-19) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Twehamye%20v%20Uganda%20\[2001\]%20UGSC%2012%20\(19%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19) __Save [ Download PDF (3.6 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (3.6 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Twehamye v Uganda [2001] UGSC 12 (19 September 2001) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Twehamye v Uganda [2001] UGSC 12 (19 September 2001) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2001] UGSC 12 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judges [Odoki, CJ](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Odoki%2C%20CJ) Judgment date 19 September 2001 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence Read full summary ###### Case summary The first complaint on appeal was that the evidence of the victim child had not been properly corroborated by the lower courts. The court observed that the victim had been corroborated by her mother who examined her and found her private parts bruised and sperms in her pants’ also that the evidence of the victim’s brother also corroborated the victim’s evidence. The appeal was thereby dismissed. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 3.6 MB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/12/eng@2001-09-19/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >